Warriorfan wrote:clippertown wrote:So does this mean the Clippers could trade Jamal to a team like the Nets along with some cash and a 1st round pick, then have the Nets waive Jamal a few days later so the Clips can re-sign him to a vet minimum deal?
Jamal would get paid out on his original deal and then make more money from his second deal. Meanwhile, our cap would be manipulated and we might be able to sign additional players. I would think many veterans would be open to this if it was to extend their careers. Its definitely not something the league wants to happen, so why let it happen for Bogut?
How much more help does GSW need? I could not respect the Warriors any less. They are embarrassing the sport. They need to grow a set and win without loading the deck. For champions, they sure are quick to take the easy path to a meaningless victory.
A third team makes colusion less likely.
Championships are never easy as the Warriors found out last year. So nothing should be taken for granted every team should take every legal measure to win a championship.
A third team is necessary and is not about collusion. The rule states that the last team that traded that player cannot sign him for another year. Clippers cannot sign Jamal Crawford because they were the last team that traded him. Warriors can sign Bogut because Dallas was the last team that traded him. Bogut went from Warriors to Dallas to 76ers. Understand the rule now?