Anticon wrote:Galloisdaman wrote:Anticon wrote:
I mean, if you think Iguodala and Harrison Barnes had the same impact on the Warriors I'm not sure what to tell you. And Pippen, Jordan and Rodman from the 96 Bulls are all in the Hall so...
And again, no one here is articulating the actual criteria the Hall of Fame will use. People are substituting their own standards.
Jordan, Pippen and Rodman are 3 players not 4 players as you said in your post. They are 3 starters from their 72 win season not a backup. They are 3 guys that would have been in the Hall with or without winning 72 games in a season. Your argument is full of holes.
Actually Steve Kerr must have viewed Barnes contribution higher than you since Barnes was a starter and played more minutes per game than Iggy. Neither one is a HOF player. I was just showing how thin your argument for being in the HOF based on being on a 73 win team was IMO.
Ron Harper was a starter on the Bulls 72 win team. He is not in the HOF and he was probably a better player than Iggy before he blew out his knee.
I don't know man, all this shows is how little you understand the Warriors and how critical Iggy was to them winning a title.
Iggy was an important part of a team but not even one of the top 3 in terms of being critical. That does not make him a Hall Of Famer. Larry Brown was a scrub who was important (MVP) for the Cowboys winning the Superbowl. Still not a Hall Of fame player. If Iggy was on a team other than the Warriors would he be a Hall Of Famers? Did anyone look at Iggy and say Hall Of Famer before the Warriors. Rings should not make a Hall Of Famer. They should be the icing on top of a Hall Of Fame Career. Iggy was allowed to have some nice moments in part because other teams focus so much energy on stopping Curry, Klay, Green, and later Durant. Nobody is going in to games against the Warriors worried about playing defense against Iggy. In fact I would do a hack a shack against Iggy in games.













