antonaki1 wrote:Yes easily, typical Lebron and his bought teams. If he stayed long enough to win the organic way he would get a lot more respect from the league fan base.
Do you still work in the first job you got after school?
Moderators: cupcakesnake, Domejandro, infinite11285, Harry Garris, ken6199, Dirk, bisme37, KingDavid, zimpy27, bwgood77
antonaki1 wrote:Yes easily, typical Lebron and his bought teams. If he stayed long enough to win the organic way he would get a lot more respect from the league fan base.
markjay wrote:So, now that the team is largely filled out, let's take another look. Here is their 2-deep roster
Gasol/Harrell
Davis/Morris
LeBron/Kuzma
Caldwell-Pope/Matthews
Schroder/Caruso
What do you think?
lazybatman wrote:antonaki1 wrote:Yes easily, typical Lebron and his bought teams. If he stayed long enough to win the organic way he would get a lot more respect from the league fan base.
Do you still work in the first job you got after school?
lazybatman wrote:antonaki1 wrote:Yes easily, typical Lebron and his bought teams. If he stayed long enough to win the organic way he would get a lot more respect from the league fan base.
Do you still work in the first job you got after school?
Benedict_Boozer wrote:markjay wrote:So, now that the team is largely filled out, let's take another look. Here is their 2-deep roster
Gasol/Harrell
Davis/Morris
LeBron/Kuzma
Caldwell-Pope/Matthews
Schroder/Caruso
What do you think?
This is a really balanced team - what's crazy is it somehow is alot younger which seemed impossible given the Lakers lack of trade assets and cap space.
I think the only holes are:
1. I think the team needs another athletic/rim protecting big
2. A wing defender with some size/athleticism, Matthews is a tad small for the larger elite wings and Morris is a tad slow footed; remember last year guys like Tatum and Butler lighting them up
3. A 3rd backup PG in case Caruso or Schroder gets hurt, not as important with Lebron but would be good insurance
That will be hard to get with vet min contracts or buyouts but not impossible. If they shored up those holes the only thing beating that team is health or LBJ's decline.
bullsaficianado wrote:They are a deep team but if say LeBron get's injured I don't see them winning the championship. Not deep like the Warriors were with KD. I also have to wonder how slow they will be against faster and quicker teams. On paper it looks like a Lakers repeat, it depends how well LeBron holds up and how he plays. I don't think Davis as the star himself is capable of winning an NBA title he showed it with Pelicans, he needs another star player alongside him to do it. So despite being deep same as last year they go as far as LeBron/AD take them.
Benedict_Boozer wrote:markjay wrote:So, now that the team is largely filled out, let's take another look. Here is their 2-deep roster
Gasol/Harrell
Davis/Morris
LeBron/Kuzma
Caldwell-Pope/Matthews
Schroder/Caruso
What do you think?
This is a really balanced team - what's crazy is it somehow is alot younger which seemed impossible given the Lakers lack of trade assets and cap space.
I think the only holes are:
1. I think the team needs another athletic/rim protecting big
2. A wing defender with some size/athleticism, Matthews is a tad small for the larger elite wings and Morris is a tad slow footed; remember last year guys like Tatum and Butler lighting them up
3. A 3rd backup PG in case Caruso or Schroder gets hurt, not as important with Lebron but would be good insurance
That will be hard to get with vet min contracts or buyouts but not impossible. If they shored up those holes the only thing beating that team is health or LBJ's decline.
Optms wrote:Freighttrain wrote:IDK why everybody is saying we're losing a lot of defense.
Caruso
KCP
Kuz
LeBron
AD
That has been our closing line-up in almost all of our games. Now we also have Wes instead of Green but that's a wash. So basically we're only losing Howard's shot blocking ability. But we're still not done exploring the market for minimum contracts or ring chasers and thus a potential shotblocker or someone that can bring another versatility part on our team. On the other hand, we have added 2 19 point scorers which we can plug into our line-up, who create their own offense without LeBron's help and even win games if he's out. I'll take my chances. This year's roster is clearly better than last year.
They think Dwight Howard was the bulk of our defense for some reason. We can still lock up anyone with that starting 5. Defense is the Lakers culture now, no one player changes that.
hoopsinthesky wrote:deeeeeeeep.
sad to see rondo go tho. such an intellectual. There was this moment when they won one of the playoff games, I believe against the nuggets, on ADs buzzer beater, and rondo looked so pissed. wasn't excited about the last second shot -- like he knew it shouldn’t have come down to that. He didn't just want to win, he wants to win in a certain way. he has such a love for the game and the flow.
I get why he went to the hawks... great way to make money and retire, but also think he’s intellectually excited by getting to shape Trae and that team. like it’s a different type of challenge. I couldn't imagine him going somewhere that his mind wouldn't be working in interesting ways. I think its why he didn't go the clips route... obv the clear money thing, but deeper than that I don't think he wanted that environment.
LakersSoul wrote:hoopsinthesky wrote:deeeeeeeep.
sad to see rondo go tho. such an intellectual. There was this moment when they won one of the playoff games, I believe against the nuggets, on ADs buzzer beater, and rondo looked so pissed. wasn't excited about the last second shot -- like he knew it shouldn’t have come down to that. He didn't just want to win, he wants to win in a certain way. he has such a love for the game and the flow.
I get why he went to the hawks... great way to make money and retire, but also think he’s intellectually excited by getting to shape Trae and that team. like it’s a different type of challenge. I couldn't imagine him going somewhere that his mind wouldn't be working in interesting ways. I think its why he didn't go the clips route... obv the clear money thing, but deeper than that I don't think he wanted that environment.
I like Rondo even though he was frustrating to see during RS. Playoff Rondo was beauty in motion, a true work of art.
One thing about Rondo is his fire and loyalty. There was no way after loving Purple and Gold that he was going to jump to Clippers, not this season. He is just a passionate and loyal person to a fault.
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.
by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53
im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.