scrabbarista wrote:Texas Chuck wrote:None of that matters mate. The point is the Bulls were a good team without Mike--as your wall of text concedes.
My whole point is that we shouldn't decide MVP based on who has the least help. Pick a different example if you don't like Mike.
None of that matters mate. The point is that the Bulls weren't remotely the same team in '93 as in '94 (added four major contributors), and weren't nearly as bad in '93 as the 57 wins you cited nor nearly as good in '94 as the 55 wins you cited -- as my wall of text conclusively proves.
My whole point was that the '93 and '94 Bulls have nothing to do with the point you were trying to make. Pick a different example if you want to reinforce your point.
The W-L record is what who matters for a team at the end of the day.Nobody have said that the Bulls were as good without Jordan,but it was still a very good supporting cast and the 1994 season is a example of that.










