Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,677
And1: 99,121
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#121 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Sep 18, 2021 6:34 pm

Lunartic wrote:I guess we found Chuck's burner account.


I'm genuinely flattered that you think I'm capable of communicating as intelligently and as eloquently as that, but sadly I cannot.

Appreciate the kind words though even as you remain an asterisk truther.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,677
And1: 99,121
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#122 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Sep 18, 2021 6:37 pm

twyzted wrote:2020 should have an asterisk.

Image



Easy denial. Lakers faced the same situation in Orlando as all of their competitors. And if anything without travel and distractions from family/household obligations you could argue this was one of the purer competitions. No HCA even. Just my guys and your guys on a neutral court.

* Denied
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,677
And1: 99,121
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#123 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Sep 18, 2021 6:39 pm

ellobo wrote:It's Chuck's thread, so he's the judge and jury (and evidently court of appeals),


I would have preferred a committee of more than one honestly, but didn't know who all I could trust. Some of these agenda guys are pretty sneaky and look objective, but then have that one team or player they or love so much that an * might slip past that shouldn't.

Plus for something of this magnitude of historical importance on a global scale we really need unanimous results. Which I can provide.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Wallace_Wallace
Head Coach
Posts: 6,014
And1: 7,314
Joined: Jul 28, 2017
       

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#124 » by Wallace_Wallace » Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:14 pm

dirkforpres wrote:2006 deserves the biggest asterisk possible. There’s no debate


This would be my vote as well. I was watching those finals, there's no way they're not calling fouls every other time Wade shoots. It's not even amazing shot making abilities ala Kobe/Dirk/KD/LeBron, it's averaging 16 FTs a game that kind of disgusts me.
JN61
RealGM
Posts: 11,733
And1: 9,247
Joined: Jan 07, 2018
 

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#125 » by JN61 » Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:28 pm

og15 wrote:
JN61 wrote:2011 needs asterisk. The biggest meltdown by NBA superstar in the league history.

The asterisk signifies that an accomplishment is tainted, a player on the opposing team playing poorly doesn't taint anything though, so how would that even work? What's the argument for it being tainted? Did the Mavs spike Lebron's food and drink? Then yes, tainted. Did Lebron meltdown on his own? That's just sports. Maybe you have some inside info though, that could change things ;)

I was being sarcastic due to OPs aligment.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,677
And1: 99,121
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#126 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:52 pm

JN61 wrote:
og15 wrote:
JN61 wrote:2011 needs asterisk. The biggest meltdown by NBA superstar in the league history.

The asterisk signifies that an accomplishment is tainted, a player on the opposing team playing poorly doesn't taint anything though, so how would that even work? What's the argument for it being tainted? Did the Mavs spike Lebron's food and drink? Then yes, tainted. Did Lebron meltdown on his own? That's just sports. Maybe you have some inside info though, that could change things ;)

I was being sarcastic due to OPs aligment.


I am impervious to your attempts to appeal to my partisan nature. I have been fighting the 06 * longer and harder than any of them. When the other team beats you, you tip your cap and hope you get a chance to run it back. 5 years later they did. :D

Do the Mavs have a championship in 2011 if Lebron plays to typical Lebron Finals level? Of course not. Did the Mavs have something to do with how he played? Obviously different people have different takes, but I think we have enough evidence over the 8 meetings that year plus a look at the Mavs personnel to suggest they played a role in that. OTOH, you don't stop a player they great, some of that was obviously an issue with Lebron himself.

Doesn't matter though. Did the Mavs win enough games to qualify for the playoffs? Yep. Did they beat Portland? Yep. Did they beat LA? Oh hell yeah they did. Did they beat OKC? Yep. Did they finish off Lebron and that coward DWade and the rest of the Heat? Yep.

So champions. This isn't rocket science. But 94 and 95 were Rocket science and thus no * there either.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
QingJames
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,877
And1: 2,450
Joined: Apr 13, 2021
 

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#127 » by QingJames » Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:05 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
twyzted wrote:2020 should have an asterisk.

Image



Easy denial. Lakers faced the same situation in Orlando as all of their competitors. And if anything without travel and distractions from family/household obligations you could argue this was one of the purer competitions. No HCA even. Just my guys and your guys on a neutral court.

* Denied

I do think, with regards to the bubble, it is often overlooked about how some players were able to spend their time between the suspension of the season and the start of the bubble vis-a-vis other players. Lebron, for instance, being an established star was able to use his home gym and home basketball courts to stay ready and fresh. An unestablished and “poorer” star like Siakam had to stay confined to his condo and was unable to pick up a ball for 4 months. Ditto for Middleton. That disparity showed VERY clearly on the court, but people handwave that away. At the very least it’s BS that the bubble was a level playing field because of that background context.
eyeatoma wrote:You guys still dont' get it. Playoff accomplishment don't matter when you're up for your 1st MVP. When you're up for your 3rd in a row, damn straight it matters, as the only ones who done it are top 15 players of all time who have won rings.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,677
And1: 99,121
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#128 » by Texas Chuck » Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:15 pm

QingJames wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
twyzted wrote:2020 should have an asterisk.

Image



Easy denial. Lakers faced the same situation in Orlando as all of their competitors. And if anything without travel and distractions from family/household obligations you could argue this was one of the purer competitions. No HCA even. Just my guys and your guys on a neutral court.

* Denied

I do think, with regards to the bubble, it is often overlooked about how some players were able to spend their time between the suspension of the season and the start of the bubble vis-a-vis other players. Lebron, for instance, being an established star was able to use his home gym and home basketball courts to stay ready and fresh. An unestablished and “poorer” star like Siakam had to stay confined to his condo and was unable to pick up a ball for 4 months. Ditto for Middleton. That disparity showed VERY clearly on the court, but people handwave that away. At the very least it’s BS that the bubble was a level playing field because of that background context.


Siakam and Middleton aren't too poor to have had access to a basketball court. They have made different choices as to their living situation, but I'm not holding that against Lebron. That would be of course asinine.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
twyzted
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,880
And1: 2,208
Joined: Jun 01, 2018
     

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#129 » by twyzted » Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:40 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
twyzted wrote:2020 should have an asterisk.

Image



Easy denial. Lakers faced the same situation in Orlando as all of their competitors. And if anything without travel and distractions from family/household obligations you could argue this was one of the purer competitions. No HCA even. Just my guys and your guys on a neutral court.

* Denied


Hahaha im also in the opinion that there are no asterisks. I just couldnt let the opportunity to post that image pass by me.
Pennebaker wrote:Jordan lacks LeBron's mental toughness.
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,029
And1: 33,855
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#130 » by og15 » Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:45 pm

QingJames wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
twyzted wrote:2020 should have an asterisk.

Image



Easy denial. Lakers faced the same situation in Orlando as all of their competitors. And if anything without travel and distractions from family/household obligations you could argue this was one of the purer competitions. No HCA even. Just my guys and your guys on a neutral court.

* Denied

I do think, with regards to the bubble, it is often overlooked about how some players were able to spend their time between the suspension of the season and the start of the bubble vis-a-vis other players. Lebron, for instance, being an established star was able to use his home gym and home basketball courts to stay ready and fresh. An unestablished and “poorer” star like Siakam had to stay confined to his condo and was unable to pick up a ball for 4 months. Ditto for Middleton. That disparity showed VERY clearly on the court, but people handwave that away. At the very least it’s BS that the bubble was a level playing field because of that background context.
I don't know man, compared to these guys, I'm "poor", my office was down to 1 day a week for just emergency patients for the first two months, we went up to two days a week around July, then didn't get back to 4 days a week until around September or so. Since I couldn't go to the gym or use the public courts anymore, I bought a basketball hoop and a ball return system in the beginning of April. So my poor self was able to figure out a way to get shots up and work on my game, I'm not really going to give excuses for millionaires for not finding a way if they REALLY wanted to find a way.
art_tatum
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,738
And1: 4,385
Joined: Jun 01, 2018
 

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#131 » by art_tatum » Sat Sep 18, 2021 9:26 pm

I wouldnt be surprised if there turned out to be some shady things that happened in a previous, Especially older championship. Mostly regarding refs and bets/mob influence, but maybe sometimes players.

But only things that should deserve the * is cheating like the houston astros, or outside influence via refs.
Wammy Giveaway
Veteran
Posts: 2,553
And1: 1,162
Joined: Jul 30, 2013

An Unfortunate Truth 

Post#132 » by Wammy Giveaway » Sun Sep 19, 2021 12:56 am

Personally, I would love to apply my asterisks philosophy for Herculean series-altering efforts, but this is Texas Chuck's list, and I'm not touching it any further. What I've seen so far is that people are willing to discredit another team's championships to make them feel better about their own team, to keep their pride going. The fear is, if the losing team admits their defeat fair and square, it would make them look weak and other teams will now ridicule, embarass, humiliate and otherwise torture their team to the point that they are easily beatable. They'll miss the playoffs every year and be a joke, or worse, a relocation or contraction candidate. That's when we start asterisking.

How do you answer to your losses: you accept responsibility and the consequences to your actions, serve your punishments, work on your weaknesses, remove distractions that could otherwise derail your chances at a title - even if it means trading or firing someone who meant so much to your franchise - and start taking competition seriously. Win those games, defeat your opponents, and always look to improve. It's not just doing the little things that are important, it's doing the good things as well. I have a saying: "Good things beget good karma."

There is no such thing as an asterisks in championships, only risk.
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 9,755
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#133 » by Lunartic » Sun Sep 19, 2021 1:20 pm

Salieri wrote:
Lunartic wrote:I guess we found Chuck's burner account.


Okay, I guess you prefer a condescending tone to have this discussion instead of a neutral, respectful one. Let it be known I wasn't the one who picked it, but I'll oblige.


My goodness, it's called a joke, my little Salieri. I don't think I'll derive too much pleasure from engaging with you. Lighten up.
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 9,755
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#134 » by Lunartic » Sun Sep 19, 2021 1:24 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
Lunartic wrote:I guess we found Chuck's burner account.


I'm genuinely flattered that you think I'm capable of communicating as intelligently and as eloquently as that, but sadly I cannot.

Appreciate the kind words though even as you remain an asterisk truther.


What you call "eloquent", actual intelligent folks call ridiculously verbose and pedantic with zero sense of humor.

*Asterisk* truthers will get their day in the sun and you'll be begging for us to accept you. In the meantime, I'm ASS-terisking every single championship won except for the 2019 Raptors and 2011 Bulls semi-conference title.
Salieri
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,706
And1: 10,278
Joined: Aug 02, 2013

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#135 » by Salieri » Sun Sep 19, 2021 2:31 pm

Lunartic wrote:
Salieri wrote:
Lunartic wrote:I guess we found Chuck's burner account.


Okay, I guess you prefer a condescending tone to have this discussion instead of a neutral, respectful one. Let it be known I wasn't the one who picked it, but I'll oblige.


My goodness, it's called a joke, my little Salieri. I don't think I'll derive too much pleasure from engaging with you. Lighten up.


Let's start with clarifying something: I didn't find that comment offensive, I can only wish I was as good a poster as Chuck. I used that as a quote because I wanted to quote your entire post and not snip anything, so you keep being the only one who ignores what he can't refute. Case in point, you ignored my entire post and focused a petty comeback. That's a pretty clear admission of defeat, and I'm glad we're both on the same page.

But you need to understand something, my friend: there is a difference between posting something that'll make you laugh with me (joking) and posting something that'll make you laugh at me (mocking). I won't delve into what makes you giddy or how much of a class act you are if you find mocking funnier than joking. Let's just say I didn't feel offended but I saw your intentions and I wasn't too pleased. That should be understandable by a reasonable person.

Now go on, keep derailing the thread because you have no counter to the points made. Facts are facts, and every single NBA champion having won that year's title in a complete playoff run remains a FACT, thus they are all champions. You can keep calling them flukers, or asterisked champs, or scotch taped scrotal sacks if you want. They are still champs.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,229
And1: 8,592
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#136 » by SNPA » Sun Sep 19, 2021 3:49 pm

Quick little reminder….

*2002
User avatar
bisme37
Forum Mod - Celtics
Forum Mod - Celtics
Posts: 24,915
And1: 72,341
Joined: May 24, 2014
 

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#137 » by bisme37 » Sun Sep 19, 2021 3:51 pm

I'm currently making a list of RGM posters who require an asterisk haha.
Rodwilliams
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,425
And1: 963
Joined: Feb 12, 2020

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#138 » by Rodwilliams » Sun Sep 19, 2021 3:59 pm

Lunartic wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:
Lunartic wrote:I guess we found Chuck's burner account.


I'm genuinely flattered that you think I'm capable of communicating as intelligently and as eloquently as that, but sadly I cannot.

Appreciate the kind words though even as you remain an asterisk truther.


What you call "eloquent", actual intelligent folks call ridiculously verbose and pedantic with zero sense of humor.

*Asterisk* truthers will get their day in the sun and you'll be begging for us to accept you. In the meantime, I'm ASS-terisking every single championship won except for the 2019 Raptors and 2011 Bulls semi-conference title.



Yea that’s definitely his burner account. He called that garbage eloquent and intelligent.

Chuck has already been defeated numerous times on this thread by multiple people and if you notice when he loses the battles he just deflects and changes the subject. He just says “denied” or “you hate this team so I can’t take you “serious”. He hasn’t really offered much substance. I guess he saw he was losing pretty bad on this thread so he decided to log into his burner account to try and make things look better cause he got destroyed on this thread.
Harry Garris wrote: Curry can turn non playoff teams into title contenders.

Not if the team doesn’t have elite defenders[/quote]
What a pointless statement.Every Finals team had elite role players[/quote]
Rodwilliams wrote:Duh!Thats what I just said. Eat your own words
User avatar
ItsDanger
RealGM
Posts: 28,502
And1: 25,694
Joined: Nov 01, 2008

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#139 » by ItsDanger » Sun Sep 19, 2021 3:59 pm

There was a good multi part documentary for Kings 2002 fraud on YT previously. Deleted now. Hmmmm.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
User avatar
packforfreedom
Analyst
Posts: 3,276
And1: 4,023
Joined: Nov 06, 2012
 

Re: Chuck's Definitive List of NBA Champions Not Requiring Asterisk 

Post#140 » by packforfreedom » Sun Sep 19, 2021 4:03 pm

Texas Chuck wrote:
uncleoswald wrote:kobe was usually good, but against the 2004 pistons he was not good.

i feel like it would be a more faithful retelling of history to say he was good against the pistons, on account of the fact that he was usually good.

i suggest the 2004 pistons get an asterisk.



Damn. Damn. I really don't want to hand out an asterisk to the 04 Pistons, but that case is nearly airtight. Kobe normally good, not good here, and lots of people really love Kobe and we had a huge Kobe fan just handing out asterisks left and right earlier this week so this would totally please him.

Yep, gonna have to allow this one.

2004 Detroit Pistons*


since 2004 is the only approved asterisk, can we add another asterisk on top of the first one? Sam Cassell doing the 'big balls dance' against the Kings, injuring his hip and effectively ending the most promising season for us, since we'd probably would've beaten the Lakers. This 'what if' is the only thing we have. Please don't take it from us.

Return to The General Board