Lunartic wrote:Salieri wrote:Lunartic wrote:I guess we found Chuck's burner account.
Okay, I guess you prefer a condescending tone to have this discussion instead of a neutral, respectful one. Let it be known I wasn't the one who picked it, but I'll oblige.
My goodness, it's called a joke, my little Salieri. I don't think I'll derive too much pleasure from engaging with you. Lighten up.
Let's start with clarifying something: I didn't find that comment offensive, I can only wish I was as good a poster as Chuck. I used that as a quote because I wanted to quote your entire post and not snip anything, so you keep being the only one who ignores what he can't refute. Case in point, you ignored my entire post and focused a petty comeback. That's a pretty clear admission of defeat, and I'm glad we're both on the same page.
But you need to understand something, my friend: there is a difference between posting something that'll make you laugh with me (joking) and posting something that'll make you laugh
at me (mocking). I won't delve into what makes you giddy or how much of a class act you are if you find mocking funnier than joking. Let's just say I didn't feel offended but I saw your intentions and I wasn't too pleased. That should be understandable by a reasonable person.
Now go on, keep derailing the thread because you have no counter to the points made. Facts are facts, and every single NBA champion having won that year's title in a complete playoff run remains a FACT, thus they are all champions. You can keep calling them flukers, or asterisked champs, or scotch taped scrotal sacks if you want. They are still champs.