BigShot Bojan wrote:Ducking teams is for losers…
this
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
BigShot Bojan wrote:Ducking teams is for losers…
RHODEY wrote:JimmyFromNz wrote:RHODEY wrote:
Unsure if you watched the game or not
You mean the part where our starters were more concerned with their post-game dinner booking, and Mazzulla was openly criticised for playing them in such a meaningless contest due to having a 15 game buffer since wrapping up #1 seed three weeks prior?
Congratulations on the #2 seed, believe me, absolutely no one outside of New York thinks April 11th meant a single thing. Its not quite the 'reality' you're after
No I meant the part were Mazzulla rolled out his entire starting lineup for a " meaningless contest" , then got summarily spanked on his own home floor. Having a 15 game buffer does change the fact of the butt whipping, and putting in all your starters doesn't imply a lack of concern for winning.
So not only did you get embarrassed by a compromised team.. your coach lacked the tact o give the Knicks any credit. I'm not surprised that Boston fans would follow suit.
homecourtloss wrote:meekrab wrote:durden_tyler wrote:So honestly, just answer the question; if you had a choice, would you rather meet the Pacers or Sixers in a best of seven series?
I'd rather have HCA against the Bucks than worry about which low seeded team I'm playing.
Yes, but neither Miami nor Philadelphia is a typical “low seeded team”; Miami plays better than anyone in the playoffs and the Sixers with Embiid playing have been a juggernaut. In a playoffs environment, both the Sixers and the Heat are top five teams in the East. The Knicks will now have to beat one of them, then Giannis, then the Celtics. Additonally, the separation between the #2 team and the #8 team has never been narrower as every team is loaded with talent and a lot depends on shooting variance on wide open threes.
Knicks have been my favorite team to watch this year, though, and I can’t help but root for Brunson.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Eagle4 wrote:Will be nice to see how quiet the nba spaces are when knicks get bounced out early yet again. Celebrating 50 wins like it's 70 and are poised for a finals bout.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
celtxman wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:celtxman wrote:Here we go with Middleton again. The gift that keeps on giving. But the subject was tanking and it was costly for the Bucks. They could have beaten the Celtics without Middleton,and homecourt but they chose to avoid the Nets.
Apparently Tatum can’t get out of round 1 with a missing co-Star but Giannis is that much better that he should carry a team past the Finals representative for the conference?
....and we continue to dance around the topic of losing a game on purpose and it blowing up in Milwaukee 's face. Their fear of the Nets cost them. That is the topic of the thread
Eagle4 wrote:bronxknicksfan1 wrote:Eagle4 wrote:Will be nice to see how quiet the nba spaces are when knicks get bounced out early yet again. Celebrating 50 wins like it's 70 and are poised for a finals bout.
We don’t even know if your team will even be in the playoffs…so there’s that
They may very well not. Not deluded enough to think they're '17 Warrriors unlike some in regard to their team in the occasions they actually make the playoffs. That's the point.
cgf wrote:Eagle4 wrote:Will be nice to see how quiet the nba spaces are when knicks get bounced out early yet again. Celebrating 50 wins like it's 70 and are poised for a finals bout.
"yet again"?
BigGargamel wrote:God why is this losing talk so rampant on this board right now? Teams don't care who they face, they're confident in their ability to beat anyone. Or at least they should be. Losing on purpose to draw another team is weak, loser mentality and no one in the NBA thinks this. Fans are weird.
Mamba81p wrote:RHODEY wrote:JimmyFromNz wrote:
You mean the part where our starters were more concerned with their post-game dinner booking, and Mazzulla was openly criticised for playing them in such a meaningless contest due to having a 15 game buffer since wrapping up #1 seed three weeks prior?
Congratulations on the #2 seed, believe me, absolutely no one outside of New York thinks April 11th meant a single thing. Its not quite the 'reality' you're after
No I meant the part were Mazzulla rolled out his entire starting lineup for a " meaningless contest" , then got summarily spanked on his own home floor. Having a 15 game buffer does change the fact of the butt whipping, and putting in all your starters doesn't imply a lack of concern for winning.
So not only did you get embarrassed by a compromised team.. your coach lacked the tact o give the Knicks any credit. I'm not surprised that Boston fans would follow suit.
You do realize that it's just a regular season game right?
Bob Ross wrote:Stupid thread. First 50 win season in 23 years and the second seed down one all star. Tanking for position is cowardly and a fools game
JimmyFromNz wrote:RHODEY wrote:JimmyFromNz wrote:
You mean the part where our starters were more concerned with their post-game dinner booking, and Mazzulla was openly criticised for playing them in such a meaningless contest due to having a 15 game buffer since wrapping up #1 seed three weeks prior?
Congratulations on the #2 seed, believe me, absolutely no one outside of New York thinks April 11th meant a single thing. Its not quite the 'reality' you're after
No I meant the part were Mazzulla rolled out his entire starting lineup for a " meaningless contest" , then got summarily spanked on his own home floor. Having a 15 game buffer does change the fact of the butt whipping, and putting in all your starters doesn't imply a lack of concern for winning.
So not only did you get embarrassed by a compromised team.. your coach lacked the tact o give the Knicks any credit. I'm not surprised that Boston fans would follow suit.
What is it that you are trying to suggest? That its representative of something?
Are the Knicks now better than the Celtics? Should we be worried about the 11 April ? Has reality hit!?
It was an utterly meaningless game for us, we know, you know it, the entire commentary around the game observed it - the exact same observations made the night before when putting out a similarly lacklustre effort against the Bucks. The fact you've referenced it in response to a genuine criticism of the approach to playoff seeding is funny.
But if you want to hold onto avoiding being swept 4-0 in the season series, that is your prerogative.
I'm more than happy to give the Knicks credit, Brunson is one of my favourite players, the NBA is better when the Knicks are good.
Unfortunately your fanbase don't make it easy on yourselves !
WestbrookGOATed wrote:Gotta beat the best to be the best. Throwing that game for a more favorable match up would show the players managements lack of confidence in them.
DOT wrote:I don't see the point in trying to avoid matchups in the playoffs, cause you're gonna have to face good teams no matter what
Yeah, better odds to win the first round is nice, but at the same time you're there to win it all, so you gotta beat the best regardless
I thought this was gonna be a thread about like, that time the Knicks overpaid a bunch of guys after 2021, and then needed to trade away picks to get out of their contracts to have the space to sign Brunson, or that time we traded the 11th pick in 2022 for a bunch of future 1sts that won't convey and missed out on Jalen Williams who went 12th, or that time we traded the 19th pick in 2021 for a top 18 protected future pick, or that time this FO picked Obi Toppin 8th over Tyrese Haliburton, or that time they signed Evan Fournier to a $73 million dollar deal only to bench him after the first season
Plenty to criticize them for, but not tanking the last game isn't one of those things.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
GeorgeSears wrote:WestbrookGOATed wrote:Gotta beat the best to be the best. Throwing that game for a more favorable match up would show the players managements lack of confidence in them.
It worked for the Clippers in 2021 when the blatantly avoided the Lakers in a round 1 matchup and made it all the way to WCF.
The Knicks should be applauded for wanting "all the smoke" against Embiid and Sixers, but there has been proof that ducking works.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.