2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2)

Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77

Who is leading the MVP race?

Giannis Antetokounmpo
57
17%
Karl Anthony Towns
7
2%
Victor Wembanyama
8
2%
Luka Doncic
9
3%
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
71
22%
Nikola Jokic
127
39%
Donovan Mitchell
7
2%
Jayson Tatum
21
6%
Franz Wagner
11
3%
Other (Edwards, AD, Trae, Durant, Steph, Brunson, Sabonis, Harden, Sengun, Kyrie, LaMelo, etc. - poll is limited to 10 options)
11
3%
 
Total votes: 329

JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,248
And1: 13,771
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#121 » by JustBuzzin » Fri Nov 29, 2024 1:31 am

AleksandarN wrote:
Wolfgang630 wrote:
Magic Giannison wrote:Im not being dishonest, he literally calls out Murray and Jokic and even points out the first half vs Dallas where they didn't play defense.

More vocal with the team is asking to play better with more effort like Malone literally said few seconds after but i guess you're selectively remembering what he said.

heres the video



It’s good to see him say that. It shouldn’t matter who the hell you are your coach should not be afraid to call the best player out. Unlike other coaches who are to scared to call out the best players on their team.

Some coaches are scared to call out their best players because those player can’t take criticism. It is why I like a player like Jokic. He isn’t above to being coached

What all-time great player isn't coachable?
ky_23
Junior
Posts: 258
And1: 302
Joined: Oct 10, 2020
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#122 » by ky_23 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 2:17 am

falcolombardi wrote:
ky_23 wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:Meh, I know Jokic fills up the stat sheet, but it's a hard sell to me that he's clearly a lot better than a healthy Giannis. Especially since Giannis is an elite defensive big, and Jokic is decidedly not. I think people are underselling Jokic's weaknesses on that end to make it seem like it's not a big deal, but it kind of is, especially when his competition is an elite defensive big who is also a great offensive piece.

Jokic is an all-time great offensive big with mediocre defense, Giannis is an elite 2-way big but not historically good offensively. It's a classic debate, and without a clear winner. Especially since I don't think Jokic is in GOAT territory as far as offense is concerned.

even though giannis is still a superior defender to jokic, he is not the same beast he was 3 years ago. although it is debatable, a top one sided offensive player is more influential for team's overall performance than a top two way player imo. a player's individual presence on offensive is harder to compensate when a particular ability lacks and far more impactful than on defense because of the natural need of collaborative effort of team defense. i remember when giannis was a back to back mvp and dpoy and how much the bucks offense struggled against miami because of giannis' lack of offensive skills back then.
btw i cant see how jokic is not in goat offense territory where he makea a team with no other all star a contender every year by himself as a one side player


"Contender every year" is doing some heavy lifting here man lol

i am talking about his prime years of course. only years where you cant count them as contenders were when they had crucial missing pieces and had to have campazzo as starting guard, rely on will barton and demarcus cousins to lead offense while jokic was sitting. jokic won mvp both years tho. 2020 they played wcf, 2023 won the finals, last year they were top 3 contenders, this year you can count them after okc ,boston and maybe dallas. even with murray is underperfoming and gordon is out, denver is one of the best teams in the nba while he is on the court.
AleksandarN
General Manager
Posts: 9,341
And1: 12,848
Joined: Aug 08, 2002

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#123 » by AleksandarN » Fri Nov 29, 2024 3:06 am

JustBuzzin wrote:
AleksandarN wrote:
Wolfgang630 wrote:
It’s good to see him say that. It shouldn’t matter who the hell you are your coach should not be afraid to call the best player out. Unlike other coaches who are to scared to call out the best players on their team.

Some coaches are scared to call out their best players because those player can’t take criticism. It is why I like a player like Jokic. He isn’t above to being coached

What all-time great player isn't coachable?


Image
Packbuckman
Veteran
Posts: 2,708
And1: 1,348
Joined: Oct 02, 2019
     

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#124 » by Packbuckman » Fri Nov 29, 2024 3:21 am

ky_23 wrote:
therealbig3 wrote:Meh, I know Jokic fills up the stat sheet, but it's a hard sell to me that he's clearly a lot better than a healthy Giannis. Especially since Giannis is an elite defensive big, and Jokic is decidedly not. I think people are underselling Jokic's weaknesses on that end to make it seem like it's not a big deal, but it kind of is, especially when his competition is an elite defensive big who is also a great offensive piece.

Jokic is an all-time great offensive big with mediocre defense, Giannis is an elite 2-way big but not historically good offensively. It's a classic debate, and without a clear winner. Especially since I don't think Jokic is in GOAT territory as far as offense is concerned.

even though giannis is still a superior defender to jokic, he is not the same beast he was 3 years ago. although it is debatable, a top one sided offensive player is more influential for team's overall performance than a top two way player imo. a player's individual presence on offensive is harder to compensate when a particular ability lacks and far more impactful than on defense because of the natural need of collaborative effort of team defense. i remember when giannis was a back to back mvp and dpoy and how much the bucks offense struggled against miami because of giannis' lack of offensive skills back then.
btw i cant see how jokic is not in goat offense territory where he makea a team with no other all star a contender every year by himself as a one side player

Jokic might technically not have another all star Murray can get hot and has played like one. He also has good shooters on his team which makes a world of difference when he passing for those assists they still got to make it. Giannis is not just a two way player he is a leading the league scorer and his defense after the slow start by team has refocused him on the defensive end. His free throw shooting is only thing in my mind that’s holding him back to be undisputed best player a 85% Giannis would be as good as anybody ever. His form looks way better this year slowly going up after starting out in 50’s **** I would take back to 70’s lol
JustBuzzin
RealGM
Posts: 16,248
And1: 13,771
Joined: Jun 10, 2023
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#125 » by JustBuzzin » Fri Nov 29, 2024 3:43 am

AleksandarN wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:
AleksandarN wrote:Some coaches are scared to call out their best players because those player can’t take criticism. It is why I like a player like Jokic. He isn’t above to being coached

What all-time great player isn't coachable?


Image

LeBron has multiple championships. If he isn't coachable he wouldn't have any rings Erneh!
AleksandarN
General Manager
Posts: 9,341
And1: 12,848
Joined: Aug 08, 2002

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#126 » by AleksandarN » Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:18 am

JustBuzzin wrote:
AleksandarN wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:What all-time great player isn't coachable?


Image

LeBron has multiple championships. If he isn't coachable he wouldn't have any rings Erneh!

Because he is a control freak and coaches himself
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,177
And1: 7,362
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#127 » by doogie_hauser » Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:29 am

JustBuzzin wrote:
AleksandarN wrote:
JustBuzzin wrote:What all-time great player isn't coachable?


Image

LeBron has multiple championships. If he isn't coachable he wouldn't have any rings Erneh!


I agree with that, but you could argue that Lebron would have won at least another chip or two, if he wasn't so 'influential' regarding roster moves and trades.

Having said that, rings are as damn hard to win these days, and leading 3 different franchises to a chip is an extraordinary effort.
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,853
And1: 25,158
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#128 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:31 am

If the Nuggets are in the bottom half of the playoff picture, even if Jokic is playing like his usual self, I don’t think he gets it.

SGA is building a good case again.
SA37
RealGM
Posts: 18,735
And1: 9,431
Joined: Sep 10, 2002
Location: Basking in the Glory
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#129 » by SA37 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 12:44 pm

slick_watts wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
The issue like i said is narrative. The MVPs in Boston are the system and the FO. They can win as much as they want, no one is attributing it to Tatum. And it wouldn't necessarily be incorrect, 51 3s a game, ~7 more than the number 2 team in 3PA tells us everything we need to know.
i think it's quite easy to ignore that gap, considering the nuggets with nikola jokic in the game perform about the same as the celtics do when jayson tatum is in the game, and jokic is obvioulsy far more productive than tatum.

i'd like to hear why you think the celtics' performance without tatum and the nuggets' performance without jokic has (or should have) any bearing at all on which player should win mvp. are they emitting gamma rays from the bench that influence game outcomes when they aren't on the court? i'm open to any explanation you have.


This seems like a strong effort to minimize Tatum to the benefit of just about anything or anyone else. As I pointed out in my previous post, Tatum has finished quite high in MVP voting over the last 3 years, and we have seen others get consideration whose only claim to being in the convo was team success given 1) their largely pedestrian output and 2) the fact they were nowhere close to being the best player in the league (Billups, Gobert, Draymond Green, Ben Wallace, Marc Gasol, and Joakim Noah all fit this). That's not my opinion, but rather the opinion of those who actually vote for the award.

The issue to me is not narrative, but rather a lack of a concrete set of criteria on which we judge the MVP. If it's the best player in the league, Tatum is never going to win the award. So long as it continues to be a subjective take on an amalgamation of player output and team success, Tatum will continue to get some consideration for the award if/when Boston continues to have one of the top teams in the league and Tatum is far and away their best player.
slick_watts
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,545
And1: 6,802
Joined: Jan 03, 2005
Location: Miami, FL

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#130 » by slick_watts » Fri Nov 29, 2024 1:04 pm

SA37 wrote:
slick_watts wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
The issue like i said is narrative. The MVPs in Boston are the system and the FO. They can win as much as they want, no one is attributing it to Tatum. And it wouldn't necessarily be incorrect, 51 3s a game, ~7 more than the number 2 team in 3PA tells us everything we need to know.
i think it's quite easy to ignore that gap, considering the nuggets with nikola jokic in the game perform about the same as the celtics do when jayson tatum is in the game, and jokic is obvioulsy far more productive than tatum.

i'd like to hear why you think the celtics' performance without tatum and the nuggets' performance without jokic has (or should have) any bearing at all on which player should win mvp. are they emitting gamma rays from the bench that influence game outcomes when they aren't on the court? i'm open to any explanation you have.


If it's the best player in the league, Tatum is never going to win the award.


agreed.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 13,301
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#131 » by brackdan70 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 1:19 pm

EPM Estimated Wins
SGA
Tatum
Wagner
VanFleet
Jokic

LEBRON Data
Tatum
Jokic
SGA
Towns
Wagner
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 21,545
And1: 20,697
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#132 » by Wolfgang630 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:46 pm

Hard to me to root for this kind of player win mvp. Another Harden type.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=XO0PgrZjS-uU8MmGKL8grQ
User avatar
MoneyTalks41890
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 32,853
And1: 25,158
Joined: Oct 13, 2009
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#133 » by MoneyTalks41890 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:38 pm

Wolfgang630 wrote:Hard to me to root for this kind of player win mvp. Another Harden type.

Read on Twitter
?s=46&t=XO0PgrZjS-uU8MmGKL8grQ


That play is a foul. Six out of SGA’s 35 points came from the line in that win.
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,177
And1: 6,908
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#134 » by DirtyDez » Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:04 pm

If you take Tatum off the Celtics they’re still a top ___ team? If you take Joker off the Nuggets they’re a bottom ___ team?
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 13,301
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#135 » by brackdan70 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:17 pm

DirtyDez wrote:If you take Tatum off the Celtics they’re still a top ___ team? If you take Joker off the Nuggets they’re a bottom ___ team?

Is this how we determine it?

Well if we use EPM estimated wins as the Metric Tatum has added more so far this year.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
DirtyDez
Suns Forum College Scout
Posts: 17,177
And1: 6,908
Joined: Jun 25, 2009
Location: the Arizona desert

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#136 » by DirtyDez » Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:30 pm

brackdan70 wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:If you take Tatum off the Celtics they’re still a top ___ team? If you take Joker off the Nuggets they’re a bottom ___ team?

Is this how we determine it?

Well if we use EPM estimated wins as the Metric Tatum has added more so far this year.


Alright take away the question from an MVP perspective and just answer it as a random question.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 18,434
And1: 13,301
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#137 » by brackdan70 » Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:27 pm

DirtyDez wrote:
brackdan70 wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:If you take Tatum off the Celtics they’re still a top ___ team? If you take Joker off the Nuggets they’re a bottom ___ team?

Is this how we determine it?

Well if we use EPM estimated wins as the Metric Tatum has added more so far this year.


Alright take away the question from an MVP perspective and just answer it as a random question.

Celtics have 3.7 less wins and Nuggets have 3.2 less wins.
Jordan Walsh > Lonnie Walker and Charles Bassey
User avatar
GSP
RealGM
Posts: 19,561
And1: 16,036
Joined: Dec 12, 2011
     

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#138 » by GSP » Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:30 pm

Zion cracking jokes on bench i feel bad for Pelicans fans. Hes a bum
Hook_Em
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 1,043
Joined: Feb 19, 2012

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#139 » by Hook_Em » Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:32 pm

DirtyDez wrote:If you take Tatum off the Celtics they’re still a top ___ team? If you take Joker off the Nuggets they’re a bottom ___ team?


The Celtics have 4-5 players capable of putting up superstar performances on any given night. Thats not Tatum’s fault but they are beyond stacked with high level started as well as role players.
GiannisAnte34
Analyst
Posts: 3,422
And1: 2,786
Joined: Jun 19, 2019
 

Re: 2024-25 NBA MVP Discussion Thread (Pt. 2) 

Post#140 » by GiannisAnte34 » Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:54 am

Hook_Em wrote:
DirtyDez wrote:If you take Tatum off the Celtics they’re still a top ___ team? If you take Joker off the Nuggets they’re a bottom ___ team?


The Celtics have 4-5 players capable of putting up superstar performances on any given night. Thats not Tatum’s fault but they are beyond stacked with high level started as well as role players.


It’s honestly baffling how Celtics fans are unwilling to admit this. If you put any of the top stars in Tatums position where their teammates are Jaylen Brown, KP, White, and Holiday they are going to put up absurd numbers on excellent efficiency. Imagine Jokic or Giannis with that cast? Tatum is just in the best of the best circumstances so the expectations for him to get MVP should be quite high

Return to The General Board