playjredz wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Agreed. The Spurs would suck without Ginobili and Parker but for some reason everybody always talks about "the greatest pf of all time" and how "big men win championships." Duncan is a good solid piece to build around but he wouldn't have won those four championships if he had played on bad teams his whole career like KG did.
Duncan has already won a championship with a "bad team"..nobody can actually win a championship with an actual bad team, but he did it with as bad a team as can qualify for an NBA title..
Udrih pointed it out..Duncan is the anchor of our team..he's the #1 option in the playoffs and he's the ANCHOR of the defense..honestly, Duncan/Bowen/Popovich have become underrated on defense..Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili are average defenders, Oberto is an average defender and Finley is a terrible defender, yet the Spurs team is still one of the best defensive teams in the NBA..that's partly Duncan's first impact..
Duncan is the QB of the team..the only guy that might get more hockey assists than Duncan is Kobe, maybe KG..Duncan STILL made an impact in the only bad series he had, because those doubles allowed the rest of the Spurs to get loose..there's no way any team would double Parker and Ginobili, which negates their play if they are shooting poorly..
Parker is one of the biggest beneficiaries in the NBA..most people realize this when they watch him play..
Ginobili NEVER gets double-teamed..
if Tony Parker or Manu are shooting poorly, neither guy does anything to make up for it..Manu used to be a good defender, but he's been average this year..Parker is an average defender..both guys become erratic and untrustworthy if their shot if off, especially Manu..
when Tim Duncan struggles with his shot, he still gives you great defense and rebounding..he still QB's the team..this is the main difference IMO..
Duncan is rated as well as he is, because he has already won a championship with 2 different sets of players..1 of them was completely different and 1 of them was with some of the same players, but they were average players at the time..he's already a proven himself as a dominant player..
NBA fans have the most short-term memory of any fans..they're also brainwashed by flash more than any other fanbase..guys like Duncan and Garnett can't be measured simply by their scoring outputs..sure, Pierce, Parker and Ginobili are going to put up big numbers once in a while, but Garnett and Duncan are the only ones on those teams that can impact the game in a dominant way without scoring, which is the main reason they're always rated so highly ahead of their teammates IMO..