TimberKat wrote:Bob8 wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
My focus wasn't about the steal but about his desperation to just show up Gobert. I get it, it's guaranteed highlight material. But I think he lost focus after that. And it wasn't just me who felt that way. Simmons / Lowe mentioned it. THC mentioned it. He spent all his time trying to hunt Gobert - who BTW held LAL to 5-17.
Or maybe his 3-pointer just didn't fall, he was 0/6 after starting with 2/2, which is probably correlated with doing a lot on both ends and playing 40+ minutes. Bottom line is that Luka and Lakers did enough in first half to afford worse second half.
Do you watch any of the games? Go rewind and see how Twolves defend Luka in the second half. Also, Lakers didn't score many more points than in game one. Yet they won't by playing better defense. I am surprised by Wolves response so poorly to adjustments. Hopefully, the they will do better next game.
Luka has the most robust offensive game in Nba, that's why he's second best scorer in playoffs in Nba history. If his step back is working he's unguardable. He can be stopped only by himself.
Lakers didn't score more points because they were shooting 20% for 3, like Wolves. Normally you're not winning many games with that %. If both teams had normal %, it would have been something like 115:105.
The problem for Wolves is very evident, how to stop the best player in the series without giving others too much space? Luka is averaging 34 with great efficiency, but he's more than capable to go for 50.