zshawn10 wrote:
Would have been neat seeing curry with ball and klay. Obviously hypothetical but I think they would have been able to coexist. But they stuck with Wiseman now lol
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
zshawn10 wrote:
NADALalot wrote:Michael Jordan drafting LaMelo Ball is the smartest thing anyone has ever done in the history of basketball.
There is no limit to his future, literally GOAT potential.
Even his scoring ability looks great, and he may be the most gifted passer in NBA history.
Jedzz wrote:NADALalot wrote:Michael Jordan drafting LaMelo Ball is the smartest thing anyone has ever done in the history of basketball.
There is no limit to his future, literally GOAT potential.
Even his scoring ability looks great, and he may be the most gifted passer in NBA history.
He has looked amazing in some of these games this year for a rookie or otherwise. But it also wouldn't surprise me all that much if next season went the other way a bit.
Jedzz wrote:NADALalot wrote:Michael Jordan drafting LaMelo Ball is the smartest thing anyone has ever done in the history of basketball.
There is no limit to his future, literally GOAT potential.
Even his scoring ability looks great, and he may be the most gifted passer in NBA history.
He has looked amazing in some of these games this year for a rookie or otherwise. But it also wouldn't surprise me all that much if next season went the other way a bit.
It's just happened often enough. Not saying it will, just won't surprise me now if does. Something makes it work for him now, the roster around him, the game plans, maybe the lack of gameplans or limited expectations for the team this season that could now very well change due to what he's showing. Which means the roster might go through some changes and his freedom to play his way changes. The rest of the league gets film on him and looks for what causes him to struggle. Either plays through that or doesn't. Could be anything.CraftylikeaFox wrote:Jedzz wrote:NADALalot wrote:Michael Jordan drafting LaMelo Ball is the smartest thing anyone has ever done in the history of basketball.
There is no limit to his future, literally GOAT potential.
Even his scoring ability looks great, and he may be the most gifted passer in NBA history.
He has looked amazing in some of these games this year for a rookie or otherwise. But it also wouldn't surprise me all that much if next season went the other way a bit.
Why do you say that?

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:
This kid has been a steal for Minnesota. Say what you want about if they got No. 1 right, but they didn't mess up No. 28.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
FinnTheHuman wrote:
The way he just bumped Jaxson Hayes at 1:07 to get rid of him is something Ant does on a regular basis, no matter how bigger the defender is. This kid will make a superstar career out of driving to the basket, the blend of skill, strength, passing vision and athleticism to base his offensive game on driving is through the roof.
Quentin wrote:FinnTheHuman wrote:
The way he just bumped Jaxson Hayes at 1:07 to get rid of him is something Ant does on a regular basis, no matter how bigger the defender is. This kid will make a superstar career out of driving to the basket, the blend of skill, strength, passing vision and athleticism to base his offensive game on driving is through the roof.
If the refs had any air in their lungs Ant would have had a much better showing too. How many damn times does he get fouled with no call? That one where the guy came down on his HAND from behind on a breakaway? Come on.
Trey24 wrote:Quentin wrote:
If the refs had any air in their lungs Ant would have had a much better showing too. How many damn times does he get fouled with no call? That one where the guy came down on his HAND from behind on a breakaway? Come on.
So tired of this "rookie whistle" that a bunch of Rookies are getting this year, including Lamelo. It is sickening and a real shame that the game is officiated different ways for different people, and in my opinion it is a health hazard. The comparison between the common way of reffing and the superstar calls is one thing, but you can almost flagrant foul a rookie before the whistle blows, and we are just supposed to laugh and say, rookie calls!
I just don't want to see these young studs get hurt because of the most biased officials in sports
HotelVitale wrote:Trey24 wrote:Quentin wrote:
If the refs had any air in their lungs Ant would have had a much better showing too. How many damn times does he get fouled with no call? That one where the guy came down on his HAND from behind on a breakaway? Come on.
So tired of this "rookie whistle" that a bunch of Rookies are getting this year, including Lamelo. It is sickening and a real shame that the game is officiated different ways for different people, and in my opinion it is a health hazard. The comparison between the common way of reffing and the superstar calls is one thing, but you can almost flagrant foul a rookie before the whistle blows, and we are just supposed to laugh and say, rookie calls!
I just don't want to see these young studs get hurt because of the most biased officials in sports
That some strong words (‘sickened’) so can you tell us what you think is going on? Even assuming that rookie whistles are a thing, are you implying it’s a conspiracy that the nba is in on to make life hard on young players? The nba also puts a lot of effort into hyping up up and coming players so it seems like making their refs biased against them is counterproductive at best. What’s your theory about why rookie reffing happens, and who benefits?
Jedzz wrote:HotelVitale wrote:Trey24 wrote:So tired of this "rookie whistle" that a bunch of Rookies are getting this year, including Lamelo. It is sickening and a real shame that the game is officiated different ways for different people, and in my opinion it is a health hazard. The comparison between the common way of reffing and the superstar calls is one thing, but you can almost flagrant foul a rookie before the whistle blows, and we are just supposed to laugh and say, rookie calls!
I just don't want to see these young studs get hurt because of the most biased officials in sports
That some strong words (‘sickened’) so can you tell us what you think is going on? Even assuming that rookie whistles are a thing, are you implying it’s a conspiracy that the nba is in on to make life hard on young players? The nba also puts a lot of effort into hyping up up and coming players so it seems like making their refs biased against them is counterproductive at best. What’s your theory about why rookie reffing happens, and who benefits?
It's maybe a good thing to ask why as in what is behind it, or why as in just why it happens. But to more or less attack his opinion of what he's seeing (and others have spoken up about seeing) by calling him a conspiracy nut isn't really fair. This is what you've done here. Maybe it's just the free respect the refs are offering to the gazillionaire stars that they themselves have watched play this sport and now get to stand next to for their own job. Maybe it's nothing more than that. The refs are also doing a job at the top of their level. Maybe they either see them as their peers in this industry or some even differently like a 10 year old getting his autographed signed. What is the average age of refs in the NBA and Star players?
Trey24 wrote:Jedzz wrote:It's maybe a good thing to ask why as in what is behind it, or why as in just why it happens. But to more or less attack his opinion of what he's seeing (and others have spoken up about seeing) by calling him a conspiracy nut isn't really fair. This is what you've done here. Maybe it's just the free respect the refs are offering to the gazillionaire stars that they themselves have watched play this sport and now get to stand next to for their own job. Maybe it's nothing more than that. The refs are also doing a job at the top of their level. Maybe they either see them as their peers in this industry or some even differently like a 10 year old getting his autographed signed. What is the average age of refs in the NBA and Star players?HotelVitale wrote:
That some strong words (‘sickened’) so can you tell us what you think is going on? Even assuming that rookie whistles are a thing, are you implying it’s a conspiracy that the nba is in on to make life hard on young players? The nba also puts a lot of effort into hyping up up and coming players so it seems like making their refs biased against them is counterproductive at best. What’s your theory about why rookie reffing happens, and who benefits?
Thanks! I never thought I would hear someone tell me I am a conspiracy theorist for KNOWING that rookies get a weak whistle (not just rookies either, but entire organizations in some cases) If you watch the NBA on a nightly or even weekly basis, you know that the ref bias is a particular issue and has been for a long time, but it isn't a "mainstream" issue because the big names and big market teams tend to get the benefit of the whistle more often than others. Anyways, this was particularly relating to rookies and the lack of a whistle that they get. We are talking hacks on drives to the baskets being allowed because "they are rookies, you gotta earn the whistle". It isn't right and it isn't fair to the guys that have worked their whole life to get to this stage, and then you get to the league and a poor whistle can rock a young players confidence, make them less likely to drive to the basket, etc. It is an issue and I really don't like seeing these young studs get bullied by the refs on a nightly basis

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment