Rookie Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,764
And1: 1,325
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1361 » by TheZachAttack » Fri May 6, 2016 3:19 am

To me this just shows how advanced stats can be flawed.

Jokic is a great young player, no doubt. But Towns was had the highest fg% on ISO plays and the highest FG% on jump shots from 16-24 feet in the league. Think about how insane that is. This guy is the most effecient 1 on 1 player in the league while having the best 2 point jump shot in the league. Facts and Facts.


Jokic is not nearly the player Towns is and that's not a diss to Jokic.
Riko
Rookie
Posts: 1,090
And1: 689
Joined: Dec 17, 2015
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1362 » by Riko » Fri May 6, 2016 10:40 am

TheZachAttack wrote:To me this just shows how advanced stats can be flawed.

Jokic is a great young player, no doubt. But Towns was had the highest fg% on ISO plays and the highest FG% on jump shots from 16-24 feet in the league. Think about how insane that is. This guy is the most effecient 1 on 1 player in the league while having the best 2 point jump shot in the league. Facts and Facts.


Jokic is not nearly the player Towns is and that's not a diss to Jokic.


Jokic has great vision (better than Towns), great defensive position (despite he hasn't good blocks' number he does a lot a good thing on defense). Towns is a better overall player no doubt about it but Jokic has different strenght than Towns (despite they are both pf/c their style of play is very different) and Malone use him very well so the stats are pretty similar...
Basketball is not only 1vs1.
User avatar
wildvikeswolves
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 577
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
       

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1363 » by wildvikeswolves » Fri May 6, 2016 2:04 pm

Riko wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:To me this just shows how advanced stats can be flawed.

Jokic is a great young player, no doubt. But Towns was had the highest fg% on ISO plays and the highest FG% on jump shots from 16-24 feet in the league. Think about how insane that is. This guy is the most effecient 1 on 1 player in the league while having the best 2 point jump shot in the league. Facts and Facts.


Jokic is not nearly the player Towns is and that's not a diss to Jokic.


Jokic has great vision (better than Towns), great defensive position (despite he hasn't good blocks' number he does a lot a good thing on defense). Towns is a better overall player no doubt about it but Jokic has different strenght than Towns (despite they are both pf/c their style of play is very different) and Malone use him very well so the stats are pretty similar...
Basketball is not only 1vs1.


I doubt that
TheZachAttack
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,764
And1: 1,325
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
       

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1364 » by TheZachAttack » Fri May 6, 2016 2:35 pm

Riko wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:To me this just shows how advanced stats can be flawed.

Jokic is a great young player, no doubt. But Towns was had the highest fg% on ISO plays and the highest FG% on jump shots from 16-24 feet in the league. Think about how insane that is. This guy is the most effecient 1 on 1 player in the league while having the best 2 point jump shot in the league. Facts and Facts.


Jokic is not nearly the player Towns is and that's not a diss to Jokic.


Jokic has great vision (better than Towns), great defensive position (despite he hasn't good blocks' number he does a lot a good thing on defense). Towns is a better overall player no doubt about it but Jokic has different strenght than Towns (despite they are both pf/c their style of play is very different) and Malone use him very well so the stats are pretty similar...
Basketball is not only 1vs1.


Where did I say that? Jokic also benefits from playing on a better team that plays together better as a team. Towns is great because of his 1 on 1 skills but his ability to play as a team and that will get better as his team gets better.
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,595
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1365 » by Quentin » Fri May 6, 2016 4:12 pm

wildvikeswolves wrote:
Riko wrote:
TheZachAttack wrote:To me this just shows how advanced stats can be flawed.

Jokic is a great young player, no doubt. But Towns was had the highest fg% on ISO plays and the highest FG% on jump shots from 16-24 feet in the league. Think about how insane that is. This guy is the most effecient 1 on 1 player in the league while having the best 2 point jump shot in the league. Facts and Facts.


Jokic is not nearly the player Towns is and that's not a diss to Jokic.


Jokic has great vision (better than Towns), great defensive position (despite he hasn't good blocks' number he does a lot a good thing on defense). Towns is a better overall player no doubt about it but Jokic has different strenght than Towns (despite they are both pf/c their style of play is very different) and Malone use him very well so the stats are pretty similar...
Basketball is not only 1vs1.


I doubt that


It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,006
And1: 22,551
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1366 » by Klomp » Fri May 6, 2016 5:11 pm

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMkzspOlDho[/youtube][youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgmA2yagouc[/youtube]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Marcus
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,315
And1: 5,173
Joined: Mar 03, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1367 » by Marcus » Fri May 6, 2016 6:13 pm

Quentin wrote:
wildvikeswolves wrote:
Riko wrote:
Jokic has great vision (better than Towns), great defensive position (despite he hasn't good blocks' number he does a lot a good thing on defense). Towns is a better overall player no doubt about it but Jokic has different strenght than Towns (despite they are both pf/c their style of play is very different) and Malone use him very well so the stats are pretty similar...
Basketball is not only 1vs1.


I doubt that


It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.


make no mistake about it Jokic CAN pass the rock. Might be my favorite part of his game but to say better vision than Towns is reaching a little I think. Karl still hasn't shown the entire skillset as of yet. Dude's vision is absolute money. Can be a offensive hub from anywhere on the floor.
Watch More Basketball

Sometimes silence is the best thing you can contribute to a conversation

after what he did to Moses Moody's name, I got DJ K. Perk in a Verzuz battle against ANYBODY
RRFB
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,900
And1: 2,334
Joined: Dec 24, 2006
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1368 » by RRFB » Fri May 6, 2016 6:30 pm

Quentin wrote:
wildvikeswolves wrote:
Riko wrote:
Jokic has great vision (better than Towns), great defensive position (despite he hasn't good blocks' number he does a lot a good thing on defense). Towns is a better overall player no doubt about it but Jokic has different strenght than Towns (despite they are both pf/c their style of play is very different) and Malone use him very well so the stats are pretty similar...
Basketball is not only 1vs1.


I doubt that


It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.

:roll: And you very clearly have no idea how good Jokic's vision is. I should have known posting that article in here was a bad idea.
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,595
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1369 » by Quentin » Fri May 6, 2016 6:45 pm

RRFB wrote:
Quentin wrote:
wildvikeswolves wrote:
I doubt that


It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.

:roll: And you very clearly have no idea how good Jokic's vision is. I should have known posting that article in here was a bad idea.


:roll: Didn't say anything negative about Jokic. Only responded to the guy who made a stupid comment on Towns.
Riko
Rookie
Posts: 1,090
And1: 689
Joined: Dec 17, 2015
   

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1370 » by Riko » Fri May 6, 2016 6:58 pm

RRFB wrote:
Quentin wrote:
wildvikeswolves wrote:
I doubt that


It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.

:roll: And you very clearly have no idea how good Jokic's vision is. I should have known posting that article in here was a bad idea.



let's put this way: This year Jokic seems a better passer than Towns (if you don't like advance stats the raw stats should be enough: 189 assist vs 161 assist despite less touch and minutes).
Maybe next year Towns will be an elite big man in that category but I personally doubt about it, simply because he has too much offensive burden to carry...

And to be fair, that was not a homer take, Towns is the raising star and he will dominate the NBA one day but that doesn't mean that Towns is better than Jokic (or other young big-man) in every aspect of the game...
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,341
And1: 30,632
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1371 » by Domejandro » Fri May 6, 2016 8:23 pm

Riko wrote:
RRFB wrote:
Quentin wrote:
It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.

:roll: And you very clearly have no idea how good Jokic's vision is. I should have known posting that article in here was a bad idea.



let's put this way: This year Jokic seems a better passer than Towns (if you don't like advance stats the raw stats should be enough: 189 assist vs 161 assist despite less touch and minutes).
Maybe next year Towns will be an elite big man in that category but I personally doubt about it, simply because he has too much offensive burden to carry...

And to be fair, that was not a homer take, Towns is the raising star and he will dominate the NBA one day but that doesn't mean that Towns is better than Jokic (or other young big-man) in every aspect of the game...

What people are stating is that Karl-Anthony Towns is an amazing passing big man.
ChilledAlex
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,606
And1: 960
Joined: Jun 26, 2015

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1372 » by ChilledAlex » Sat May 7, 2016 12:34 am

:lol: Calm down guys, it won't matter who was the best rookie when KP reaches his potential
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,632
And1: 453
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1373 » by Xanadu » Sat May 7, 2016 6:26 am

ChilledAlex wrote::lol: Calm down guys, it won't matter who was the best rookie when KP reaches his potential

Even if KP reaches his potential Towns will still be the better player. Towns is what everyone thought AD was going to be. He is a big man with such a board skill set that makes him one of a kind. KP will never be the defender or rebounder Towns is. KP may even end up the better offensive player but he will never be the better all around player imho. Barring injury god forbid.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 20,341
And1: 30,632
Joined: Jul 29, 2014

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1374 » by Domejandro » Sat May 7, 2016 6:30 am

Xanadu wrote:
ChilledAlex wrote::lol: Calm down guys, it won't matter who was the best rookie when KP reaches his potential

Even if KP reaches his potential Towns will still be the better player. Towns is what everyone thought AD was going to be. He is a big man with such a board skill set that makes him one of a kind. KP will never be the defender or rebounder Towns is. KP may even end up the better offensive player but he will never be the better all around player imho. Barring injury god forbid.

I am fairly certain that he was joking.
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,632
And1: 453
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1375 » by Xanadu » Sat May 7, 2016 6:42 am

Domejandro wrote:
Xanadu wrote:
ChilledAlex wrote::lol: Calm down guys, it won't matter who was the best rookie when KP reaches his potential

Even if KP reaches his potential Towns will still be the better player. Towns is what everyone thought AD was going to be. He is a big man with such a board skill set that makes him one of a kind. KP will never be the defender or rebounder Towns is. KP may even end up the better offensive player but he will never be the better all around player imho. Barring injury god forbid.

I am fairly certain that he was joking.

Good got all fired up there for a second.
Although off topic one of my favorite discussions is what young core would you take. Wolves or Bucks?
At first glance I think most would go the Wolves(mostly due to KAT) but I think the discussion is a valid one. Giannis and KAT are both super unique one of a kind guys that could change the game. While I think a unbiased observer would take KAT I do think their value is fairly close. Although I would take Giannis because of homerism and the idea that talented wings seem to be more crucial to championship teams.
Where the discussion gets really interesting is Wiggins/Parker and Midds vs Rubio/Lavine. It seems to get closer there. With trying my hardest to remove my homer glasses I still like Parker a lot more than Wiggins. I just don't like Wiggy all that much he seems to not do anything really well. I thought his D would be better by now but he just doesn't seem to have the intensity or mindset to make his amazing gifts work for him on that end. As a scorer he doesn't seem to have very many moves and is a very streaky jump shooter. Parker just seems so much smoother with the ball. Again trying to remove my homer glasses but as we all know that can be hard.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 38,670
And1: 51,600
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1376 » by DaGawd » Sat May 7, 2016 6:53 am

Xanadu wrote:
ChilledAlex wrote::lol: Calm down guys, it won't matter who was the best rookie when KP reaches his potential

Even if KP reaches his potential Towns will still be the better player. Towns is what everyone thought AD was going to be. He is a big man with such a board skill set that makes him one of a kind. KP will never be the defender or rebounder Towns is. KP may even end up the better offensive player but he will never be the better all around player imho. Barring injury god forbid.

People jumping the gun a bit here.. I don't really see where Towns has a major advantage on AD other than he might be a bit better in the post. But AD is still young himself with room to grow
BaF
Washington Wizards
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,632
And1: 453
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1377 » by Xanadu » Sat May 7, 2016 6:57 am

DaGawd wrote:
Xanadu wrote:
ChilledAlex wrote::lol: Calm down guys, it won't matter who was the best rookie when KP reaches his potential

Even if KP reaches his potential Towns will still be the better player. Towns is what everyone thought AD was going to be. He is a big man with such a board skill set that makes him one of a kind. KP will never be the defender or rebounder Towns is. KP may even end up the better offensive player but he will never be the better all around player imho. Barring injury god forbid.

People jumping the gun a bit here.. I don't really see where Towns has a major advantage on AD other than he might be a bit better in the post. But AD is still young himself with room to grow

That is true and perhaps AD will stop falling in love with that mid range pull up. But that shot seems to have become his favorite. I thought for sure he was going to be popping threes by now. If not he should start driving/posting more but mainly right now I just see Towns as having a better chance of being Tim Duncan with a deadly pull up and handles. That's how I view Towns ceilings as a crazy TD/KG hybrid with potential three point range. I did see AD that way but he seems to have regressed this year imo.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
User avatar
wildvikeswolves
Starter
Posts: 2,025
And1: 577
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
       

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1378 » by wildvikeswolves » Sat May 7, 2016 7:10 am

Xanadu wrote:
Domejandro wrote:
Xanadu wrote:Even if KP reaches his potential Towns will still be the better player. Towns is what everyone thought AD was going to be. He is a big man with such a board skill set that makes him one of a kind. KP will never be the defender or rebounder Towns is. KP may even end up the better offensive player but he will never be the better all around player imho. Barring injury god forbid.

I am fairly certain that he was joking.

Good got all fired up there for a second.
Although off topic one of my favorite discussions is what young core would you take. Wolves or Bucks?
At first glance I think most would go the Wolves(mostly due to KAT) but I think the discussion is a valid one. Giannis and KAT are both super unique one of a kind guys that could change the game. While I think a unbiased observer would take KAT I do think their value is fairly close. Although I would take Giannis because of homerism and the idea that talented wings seem to be more crucial to championship teams.
Where the discussion gets really interesting is Wiggins/Parker and Midds vs Rubio/Lavine. It seems to get closer there. With trying my hardest to remove my homer glasses I still like Parker a lot more than Wiggins. I just don't like Wiggy all that much he seems to not do anything really well. I thought his D would be better by now but he just doesn't seem to have the intensity or mindset to make his amazing gifts work for him on that end. As a scorer he doesn't seem to have very many moves and is a very streaky jump shooter. Parker just seems so much smoother with the ball. Again trying to remove my homer glasses but as we all know that can be hard.


People love to hate Wiggins.. Possibly more then any other player on this board, but I have full confidence in him, especially with Thibs coming in.

Anyways.. I miss watching the KAT daddy play
Xanadu
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,632
And1: 453
Joined: Dec 30, 2014
     

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1379 » by Xanadu » Sat May 7, 2016 7:17 am

wildvikeswolves wrote:
Xanadu wrote:
Domejandro wrote:I am fairly certain that he was joking.

Good got all fired up there for a second.
Although off topic one of my favorite discussions is what young core would you take. Wolves or Bucks?
At first glance I think most would go the Wolves(mostly due to KAT) but I think the discussion is a valid one. Giannis and KAT are both super unique one of a kind guys that could change the game. While I think a unbiased observer would take KAT I do think their value is fairly close. Although I would take Giannis because of homerism and the idea that talented wings seem to be more crucial to championship teams.
Where the discussion gets really interesting is Wiggins/Parker and Midds vs Rubio/Lavine. It seems to get closer there. With trying my hardest to remove my homer glasses I still like Parker a lot more than Wiggins. I just don't like Wiggy all that much he seems to not do anything really well. I thought his D would be better by now but he just doesn't seem to have the intensity or mindset to make his amazing gifts work for him on that end. As a scorer he doesn't seem to have very many moves and is a very streaky jump shooter. Parker just seems so much smoother with the ball. Again trying to remove my homer glasses but as we all know that can be hard.


People love to hate Wiggins.. Possibly more then any other player on this board, but I have full confidence in him, especially with Thibs coming in.

Anyways.. I miss watching the KAT daddy play

I don't hate Wiggins in fact I wanted him the most after finding out about Embids injuries. I wanted Parker the least out of the top prospects. But after watching Wiggins in the NBA he just doesn't seem to have very good feel for the game. He is a amazing athlete but he just doesn't seem to be able to use his gifts effectively. I personally would love to seem him work it out because he still has loads of potential but I think that natural feel/look is often over looked when evaluating players. Its hard to gain that even with tons of work but I do believe Thibs will do wonders for Wiggy on the defensive side of the ball. But yeah after Giannis KAT is by far my favorite young guy to watch.
Bucks fandom bringing me happiness still seems like a dream.
Tukkerwolf
Veteran
Posts: 2,634
And1: 2,515
Joined: Nov 07, 2014
 

Re: Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#1380 » by Tukkerwolf » Sat May 7, 2016 10:10 am

Riko wrote:
RRFB wrote:
Quentin wrote:
It was a homer take. He has no idea how good Towns vision is.

:roll: And you very clearly have no idea how good Jokic's vision is. I should have known posting that article in here was a bad idea.



let's put this way: This year Jokic seems a better passer than Towns (if you don't like advance stats the raw stats should be enough: 189 assist vs 161 assist despite less touch and minutes).
Maybe next year Towns will be an elite big man in that category but I personally doubt about it, simply because he has too much offensive burden to carry...

And to be fair, that was not a homer take, Towns is the raising star and he will dominate the NBA one day but that doesn't mean that Towns is better than Jokic (or other young big-man) in every aspect of the game...


I dont want to get involved in the discussion as I dont really care, but stating that Jokic has way more assists is completely different than stating he has way beter court vision. Unless by court vision you mean the number of assists one gets.... :wink: :)

Return to The General Board