dobrojim wrote:I dunno
wouldn't you say MJ came in as a great athlete with less than stellar
fundamentals (which did get much better throughout his career)?
No.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
dobrojim wrote:I dunno
wouldn't you say MJ came in as a great athlete with less than stellar
fundamentals (which did get much better throughout his career)?

dobrojim wrote:I dunno
wouldn't you say MJ came in as a great athlete with less than stellar
fundamentals (which did get much better throughout his career)?
dobrojim wrote:Hard to say if this will be his breakout year. Could be next year, could be never.
Easy to say he mostly needs to fix his jumper. But if/when he fixes that, most of his
other flaws or below avg areas will fade into the background of brightness of the
rest of his game. Best case, he evolves into a cross between GPayton and AI.
Anybody that can average about 8 assists with the team he had has got at least some game.
Off the top of my head, I can't come up with worst case comparison not because
that isn't possible, just can't think of one, maybe because those kinds of players
are easily forgotten.
As a Wizards fan, my hope is that improved defense will lead to even more
fast break opportunities which will obviously pad his offense efficiency if only
incrementally. We understand this does need definite improvement.
Having better/smarter teammates and an actual offseason of working with
NBA level coaching should help.
BTW Wittman was mentioned somewhere in this thread as less than an
encouraging asset towards Wall's development. A year ago I would have
agreed completely. Now I'm not nearly so sure. Lets see how things are
going by around the AS break and into March for Wall and the Wizards.
One last comment - towards the end of the season Wittman had Wall initiate
the offense from WAY outside in the half court. Seemed a bit screwy but
it actually worked in that it took better advantage of Wall's best asset, speed
(as opposed to quickness). They used this briefly at the end of the season so
all the provisos re sample size and opposing talent need to be conceded. With
the floor spread with actual shooters, it worked reasonably well.