Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
jpm312
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,161
- And1: 1,966
- Joined: Feb 06, 2013
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
stop quoting currywiththepot's post.
kthxbye.
kthxbye.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
Modulate
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,084
- And1: 1,442
- Joined: Jul 02, 2013
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
BudenFerry wrote:
You have to have merits to be able to talk trash now? Are you really going to act like Lawson is some end of bench scrub?
This world and board are far too hyper sensitive.
I love how all these posters who've done nothing but log-on to RealGM are talking trash about Lawson because he apparently hasn't accomplished enough to talk trash.
Not that what Ty said was even trash talk.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
- Dark Faze
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,472
- And1: 2,127
- Joined: Dec 27, 2008
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
he's absolutely right
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
walk with me
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,739
- And1: 4,548
- Joined: Dec 01, 2013
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
The Rebel wrote:walk with me wrote:I hate
"he's a drunk"
"he was chilling at home"
"this guy is useless"
types of responses... what does that have to do with the FACT that ty lawson pointed out? Steph didn't face a starting PG for the entire playoffs. it oesn't dimish the ring or anything but if everyone is healthy next year things cold look very diferent
Ty is right, it is hard to argue with an expert and Ty is an expert on chilling on defense.
AS for how Curry did in the playoffs, maybe he did not have to face a great PG this year, [color=#FF0000]but he destroyed lawson on both ends a couple of years ago[/color].
again what does this have to do the comments TY made?? Does someone have to be a grand chef to say a meal sucks? Do i have to be in the NBA to make the observation that steph curry didn't face a starting PG all playoffs? What are you personally attacking for?
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
Lala870
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,692
- And1: 1,800
- Joined: May 29, 2014
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
Ty Lawson is right.
Also the Warrior bandwagoning ITT is ridiculous
Also the Warrior bandwagoning ITT is ridiculous
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
-
BigFatBob
- Banned User
- Posts: 721
- And1: 341
- Joined: May 14, 2014
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
NBAfan3024 wrote:Freefloater wrote:Nuggets_Talk wrote:
my same thought reading through all of this. bigfatbob sounds 12.
no one cares if you bet your username on anything. as if someone will win that bet and think "wow, I am so glad I won that bet! I got him good - he had to change his username and lose all his and1s!! hahahah!!"
no one cares about any of that.
actually people do care about it a lot... that's why he is not willing to bet his name on GSW winning...it shows hes unsure in his 'strong' opinion...
Please
I couldn't care less about and1s but I'm not wasting time doing bets with nobody's who aren't active posters and who will just disappear before the playoffs anyway
I would only do bets with regular posters. Guys like Ken I'm happy to do a fun bet with
Not trolls
Sent from my iPhone 6S Plus using Tapatalk
Dude you sound so lame right now. You only do bets with regular posters. Haha, get a life outside your computer screen
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
-
NBAfan3024
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 7,035
- Joined: May 25, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
BigFatBob wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:Freefloater wrote:
actually people do care about it a lot... that's why he is not willing to bet his name on GSW winning...it shows hes unsure in his 'strong' opinion...
Please
I couldn't care less about and1s but I'm not wasting time doing bets with nobody's who aren't active posters and who will just disappear before the playoffs anyway
I would only do bets with regular posters. Guys like Ken I'm happy to do a fun bet with
Not trolls
Sent from my iPhone 6S Plus using Tapatalk
Dude you sound so lame right now. You only do bets with regular posters. Haha, get a life outside your computer screen
I don't do bets period..it's idiotic and chilish to be honest. It's something kids do...It's something that idiots on insidehoops do.
I'm here to talk basketball and thats it. Talk about players, my team and other teams. Wether my team wins or loses I'm here to talk about the games Not play childish games.
If thats your kind of thing thats up to you...
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
BigFatBob
- Banned User
- Posts: 721
- And1: 341
- Joined: May 14, 2014
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
Nuggets_Talk wrote:jpm312 wrote:BigFatBob wrote:It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!
Gawd damn, people don't give a **** about meaningless And 1's. Grow the **** up.
my same thought reading through all of this. bigfatbob sounds 12.
no one cares if you bet your username on anything. as if someone will win that bet and think "wow, I am so glad I won that bet! I got him good - he had to change his username and lose all his and1s!! hahahah!!"
no one cares about any of that.
Your going to to far, it's not that serious
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
-
BigFatBob
- Banned User
- Posts: 721
- And1: 341
- Joined: May 14, 2014
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
NBAfan3024 wrote:BigFatBob wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:Please
I couldn't care less about and1s but I'm not wasting time doing bets with nobody's who aren't active posters and who will just disappear before the playoffs anyway
I would only do bets with regular posters. Guys like Ken I'm happy to do a fun bet with
Not trolls
Sent from my iPhone 6S Plus using Tapatalk
Dude you sound so lame right now. You only do bets with regular posters. Haha, get a life outside your computer screen
I don't do bets period..it's idiotic and chilish to be honest. It's something kids do...It's something that idiots on insidehoops do.
I'm here to talk basketball and thats it. Not play childish games.
How don't you do bets period when you just said something extremely weak like, "I would only do bets with regular posters". Then you jumped on Ken's bandwagon like you two actually know each other. And I thought we were always talking about basketball this whole time
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
-
NBAfan3024
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 7,035
- Joined: May 25, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
BigFatBob wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:BigFatBob wrote:Dude you sound so lame right now. You only do bets with regular posters. Haha, get a life outside your computer screen
I don't do bets period..it's idiotic and chilish to be honest. It's something kids do...It's something that idiots on insidehoops do.
I'm here to talk basketball and thats it. Not play childish games.
How don't you do bets period when you just said something extremely weak like, "I would only do bets with regular posters". And I thought we were always talking about basketball this whole time
I have never done bets on here and I don't ever remember anybody doing any on here either. My point was If I was to do anything like that it would be with people who I talk with on a daily basics and have good banter with.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
- Stolen Identity
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,902
- And1: 4,010
- Joined: Jun 13, 2014
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
NBAfan3024 wrote:BigFatBob wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:Please
I couldn't care less about and1s but I'm not wasting time doing bets with nobody's who aren't active posters and who will just disappear before the playoffs anyway
I would only do bets with regular posters. Guys like Ken I'm happy to do a fun bet with
Not trolls
Sent from my iPhone 6S Plus using Tapatalk
Dude you sound so lame right now. You only do bets with regular posters. Haha, get a life outside your computer screen
I don't do bets period..it's idiotic and chilish to be honest. It's something kids do...It's something that idiots on insidehoops do.
I'm here to talk basketball and thats it. Talk about players, my team and other teams. Wether my team wins or loses I'm here to talk about the games Not play childish games.
If thats your kind of thing thats up to you...
'
But they never follow through with the bets.
For those who do bet, do it with friends IRL or do it at a casino.
Stuck in Dystopia.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
-
NBAfan3024
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 7,035
- Joined: May 25, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
Stolen Identity wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:BigFatBob wrote:Dude you sound so lame right now. You only do bets with regular posters. Haha, get a life outside your computer screen
I don't do bets period..it's idiotic and chilish to be honest. It's something kids do...It's something that idiots on insidehoops do.
I'm here to talk basketball and thats it. Talk about players, my team and other teams. Wether my team wins or loses I'm here to talk about the games Not play childish games.
If thats your kind of thing thats up to you...
'
But they never follow through with the bets.
For those who do bet, do with friends IRL or do it at a casino.
Yep, thats why It's pointless. Certainly in September nobody is going think about bets come june time when the playoffs end. Said person likely won't even post by then. If they did nobody would bother following through with any bets anyway.
Anyway due to this it's gone badly off topic....back to Lawson.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
JDizzel3000
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,568
- And1: 1,043
- Joined: Jun 21, 2008
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
Modulate wrote:BudenFerry wrote:
You have to have merits to be able to talk trash now? Are you really going to act like Lawson is some end of bench scrub?
This world and board are far too hyper sensitive.
I love how all these posters who've done nothing but log-on to RealGM are talking trash about Lawson because he apparently hasn't accomplished enough to talk trash.![]()
Not that what Ty said was even trash talk.
The irony is too deep on this board
"Hey I'm gonna talk trash about you for talking trash!! Because obviously being a person speaking from my couch I have the cache to let you know MR.NBA professional that you don't have the right to talk about the NBA!!!!"
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
MrCheerios
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,009
- And1: 887
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Location: New York
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
He's right. What the hell is everyone so pissy about? That doesn't mean the Warriors didn't earn their championship or Curry didn't kick ass, the teams they faced in the playoffs just didn't have very good point guards.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
PerFex
- Junior
- Posts: 435
- And1: 347
- Joined: Jul 10, 2011
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
cloudng8 wrote:I see nothing wrong with what Ty said, people are overreacting here. Steph was MVP for a reason and well deserved, hopefully Ty fixes his personal issues and can become the top 10 PG I know he can be otherwise this will all just be hot air.
The biggest problem with this is that Ty is much worse defense player than Curry. Much worse. Maybe cuz Steph have great defense team, maybe not, but Lawson is terrible on defense when Curry is average.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
cloudng8
- Sophomore
- Posts: 236
- And1: 140
- Joined: May 22, 2012
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
PerFex wrote:cloudng8 wrote:I see nothing wrong with what Ty said, people are overreacting here. Steph was MVP for a reason and well deserved, hopefully Ty fixes his personal issues and can become the top 10 PG I know he can be otherwise this will all just be hot air.
The biggest problem with this is that Ty is much worse defense player than Curry. Much worse. Maybe cuz Steph have great defense team, maybe not, but Lawson is terrible on defense when Curry is average.
Ty didn't mean it as Steph wasn't playing defense, he means the level of competition he was playing on through the play offs was not on par due the starters being injured. While that is not Stephs fault at all, Lawson is just pointing that out and hopes to make him work in that regard.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
-
Shock Defeat
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,720
- And1: 18,827
- Joined: Aug 30, 2012
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs
PerFex wrote:cloudng8 wrote:I see nothing wrong with what Ty said, people are overreacting here. Steph was MVP for a reason and well deserved, hopefully Ty fixes his personal issues and can become the top 10 PG I know he can be otherwise this will all just be hot air.
The biggest problem with this is that Ty is much worse defense player than Curry. Much worse. Maybe cuz Steph have great defense team, maybe not, but Lawson is terrible on defense when Curry is average.
Well Ty is a type of player who thinks that the best defense is a good offense. Therefore Ty playing offense should limit Currys offense. Playing lockdown defense has nothing to do with Ty's statement. Playing good offense, does, and Ty can do that.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
- ken6199
- Forum Mod - Rockets

- Posts: 13,435
- And1: 18,740
- Joined: Jan 05, 2015
- Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
NBAfan3024 wrote:I have never done bets on here and I don't ever remember anybody doing any on here either. My point was If I was to do anything like that it would be with people who I talk with on a daily basics and have good banter with.
Dammit we are already off topic, want a bet on who gets his P45 first, Ranieri or McLaren? My money is on Ranieri (who does so well that he gets to replace Hodgson)
RealGM loves you, Melissa.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
-
NBAfan3024
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,567
- And1: 7,035
- Joined: May 25, 2013
- Contact:
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
ken6199 wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:I have never done bets on here and I don't ever remember anybody doing any on here either. My point was If I was to do anything like that it would be with people who I talk with on a daily basics and have good banter with.
Dammit we are already off topic, want a bet on who gets his P45 first, Ranieri or McLaren? My money is on Ranieri (who does so well that he gets to replace Hodgson)
Things certainly aren't looking great for your boys. Losing in the cup was a pure sign of issues there. Loving what we are doing so far. Although he needs to change his formation up abit..we are looking rather shaky at the back.
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
- ken6199
- Forum Mod - Rockets

- Posts: 13,435
- And1: 18,740
- Joined: Jan 05, 2015
- Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
-
Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was
NBAfan3024 wrote:ken6199 wrote:NBAfan3024 wrote:I have never done bets on here and I don't ever remember anybody doing any on here either. My point was If I was to do anything like that it would be with people who I talk with on a daily basics and have good banter with.
Dammit we are already off topic, want a bet on who gets his P45 first, Ranieri or McLaren? My money is on Ranieri (who does so well that he gets to replace Hodgson)
Things certainly aren't looking great for your boys. Losing in the cup was a pure sign of issues there. Loving what we are doing so far. Although he needs to change his formation up abit..we are looking rather shaky at the back.
Yep, can't rely on scoring 3 in 10 minutes for a come back win every week... See? We back to topic. I think bball loyalty raised a good point there - other than lockdown defense, playing good offense is also helping the defense, and I think that's the msg Lawson was trying to deliver - assume he was sober at that time.
RealGM loves you, Melissa.


