Jabroni Lames wrote:TheProfessor wrote:twozeroMM wrote:It's comical how people on this board are so critical of a rookie.
Same thing last year with Edwards, now look at how much he's developed.
Cade and Edwards are the polar opposite, you would see it with Edwards, Edwards had it. From the first dribble, you can tell Edward had Superstart talent. Unfortunately, he was/still is dumb/inexperienced. Whereas Cade is a very smart, high effort player but hasn't shown me any tools that scream "All-NBA or even All star".
I am not saying Cade is a bust or anything, on the contrary, I think he may even be more of a positive player than Edwards in the long run. It's just that he seems very underwhelming for a first pick when considering you have a guy like Mobley and Barnes.
Does Edwards really have Superstar talent? He’s pretty darn inefficient. Classic volume chucker shooting his team out of games, following the Wiggins path. 101 ORTG and 49% TS% are both pretty bad.
You are correct and wrong at the same time. Edwards is not a positive NBA player at the moment which spot on, bad efficiency and is below-average defensively (which is actually an improvement for him). The power, separation, ability to finish through contact are special on display every game. We can see this with our eyes throughout the game he displays the talent that 99.9% of nba players dont have.
Now the problem is the kid is your right, a lot of the time a lazy chucker. But that doesn't preclude him from having superstar talent, now it's Wolves job to bring it out.
In my previous post I wasn't implying Edwards would be a superstar, I was just implying that he hasbetter chance to be a superstar than Cade.