hardenASG13 wrote:falcolombardi wrote:hardenASG13 wrote:
That is a singular instance. Its not a pattern, therefore more unlikely it wouldve happened again. Either way, not here to argue with people about that bucks nets series, ive done that plenty. I hope they matchup both healthy this year. Nets are the team to beat imo, and i think they beat phoenix in the finals.
also happened in 2019 bucks vs raptors
is not common to come back down 0-2 without hca
but if you change the question to "how many teams won a series they tied 2-2 after being down 0-2 without hca" i would imagine is not that lopsided
and bucks were likely tying the series in game 4
Big deal. You have to win 4 out of 5 after you go down 2-0. Your citing of 2 specific examples of 0-2 comebackss does nothing for your argument.
Why do i say its likely the Nets close out that series? In the 435 NBA playoff series where a team had a 2-0 lead, that team won the series 404 times, or 92.9% of the time. The team down 0-2 had come back to win 31 times, or 7.1%. Plus, again, that game 2 was a 39 point blowout! Sorry, Bucks fans, but it was extremely likely the Nets wouldve bounced them had Kyrie stayed healthy, based on NBA history and what they showed prior to his injury.
that is not how those stats work
let me ask you this, a series starts 2-0 (90% win probability) but it ends 3-3
is it still 90% win probabibity?
what you are saying is that bucks winning game 3 didnt inprove their odds or winning game wouldnt have improved their odds cause they started 0-2
win probability changes with each game
is different at 1-0 than 2-0 than 2-1 than 3-1 etc









