This CBA sucks

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
marthafokker
General Manager
Posts: 8,448
And1: 1,011
Joined: Jul 13, 2004

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#141 » by marthafokker » Tue May 20, 2025 9:19 pm

TravisScott55 wrote:blame cheap owners


I blame dumb union President.

Why do you want your union members to get less money except for the top players only? Only to have mid tier players get squeezed out?

One reason Mavs traded Luka with this new CBA, and how much to keep him. They went about the wrong way to trade him, but they certainly didn't want to pay him. JJJ is next, watch.
TB wrote:
We finally have a team for Nellie.... bring the old drunk back.
OxAndFox
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,551
And1: 3,100
Joined: May 17, 2022
Contact:

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#142 » by OxAndFox » Tue May 20, 2025 9:20 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Patches Perry wrote:It's going to become very difficult to win a championship without really impactful players on rookie deals, or guys taking big pay cuts.

Perhaps it's my bias as an OKC fan but I wish players that a team drafted only counted as a smaller percentage against the cap. This would incentivize homegrown teams rather than free agency heavy ones. If you draft and develop a player, you should see some kind of discount against the cap for retaining them.


The problem is that neither Hartenstein nor Caruso are home grown and the Thunder signed or extended both guys knowing those rookie contracts don't last forever.

Nor is SGA.
OKC is still set up better than any other team and they will just keep doing what they're doing. They have enough picks to keep getting good enough talent while potentially (if they want to) keep SGA/Chet/JW.
They won't need to hit the cap area that restricts trading too much because they will keep rotating guys like Caruso/IH/Dort.
Its the reason they signed Wiggins and Joe to those contracts. They have thought long term and they will be bargain basement starters or near enough to that when the big 3 are maxed.
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,321
And1: 6,813
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#143 » by life_saver » Tue May 20, 2025 9:25 pm

zimpy27 wrote:We're in the transition period from less restrictions to more restrictions.

This time was always going to feel the worst.

In a few years we would have adjusted contracts to the new CBA and it won't feel as bad as this

Yep...I don't know why people are ignoring this part. If Nuggets for example knew about the new CBA 3-4 years ago, then they probably would have acted differently..especially, I am not sure MPJ could have gotten a max in that scenario
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,898
And1: 13,702
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#144 » by sp6r=underrated » Tue May 20, 2025 9:33 pm

life_saver wrote:This CBA increases importance of having good GMs who can find value in margins. Another change I am expecting is that teams will be extremely hesitant giving supermax contract unless someone is close to a top10 player.


The NBA requires every the players get a set percentage of basketball income while dramatically underpaying rookies and superstars alike. Until that changes the median veteran free agent must be overpaid.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,621
And1: 43,867
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#145 » by zimpy27 » Tue May 20, 2025 9:35 pm

life_saver wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:We're in the transition period from less restrictions to more restrictions.

This time was always going to feel the worst.

In a few years we would have adjusted contracts to the new CBA and it won't feel as bad as this

Yep...I don't know why people are ignoring this part. If Nuggets for example knew about the new CBA 3-4 years ago, then they probably would have acted differently..especially, I am not sure MPJ could have gotten a max in that scenario


This always the part people forget about restrictions.

Denver wouldn't under Connelly but I don't think their recently fired GM was very good. Look at the Murray extension, no way was he getting a max on the current market.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
reload141
RealGM
Posts: 11,755
And1: 23,401
Joined: Jan 21, 2012
       

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#146 » by reload141 » Tue May 20, 2025 9:38 pm

OxAndFox wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Patches Perry wrote:It's going to become very difficult to win a championship without really impactful players on rookie deals, or guys taking big pay cuts.

Perhaps it's my bias as an OKC fan but I wish players that a team drafted only counted as a smaller percentage against the cap. This would incentivize homegrown teams rather than free agency heavy ones. If you draft and develop a player, you should see some kind of discount against the cap for retaining them.


The problem is that neither Hartenstein nor Caruso are home grown and the Thunder signed or extended both guys knowing those rookie contracts don't last forever.

Nor is SGA.
OKC is still set up better than any other team and they will just keep doing what they're doing. They have enough picks to keep getting good enough talent while potentially (if they want to) keep SGA/Chet/JW.
They won't need to hit the cap area that restricts trading too much because they will keep rotating guys like Caruso/IH/Dort.
Its the reason they signed Wiggins and Joe to those contracts. They have thought long term and they will be bargain basement starters or near enough to that when the big 3 are maxed.


They won’t be able to keep all 3, one will get squeezed out
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,898
And1: 13,702
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#147 » by sp6r=underrated » Tue May 20, 2025 9:40 pm

pieguyxx wrote:Think people are reading too much into it. Its nothing more than to save owners money so they have an excuse not to pay the CJ McCollums of the world max/near-max money.


The CBA requires that the players get a set percentage of basketball related income while capping how much money rookies and superstars get. This CBA ensures that the CJ McCollums of the world get a disproportionate amount of the free agent dollars.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,898
And1: 13,702
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#148 » by sp6r=underrated » Tue May 20, 2025 9:45 pm

hugepatsfan wrote:For me personally, I feel the new CBA is just furthering what has been the worst impact of the "player empowerment" era. I just don't FEEL IT with any of these matchups anymore. There's no sweat equity in them. There's not the same amount of teams meeting in the playoffs back to back years or three out of 4 years with mostly the same core. The players have been hopping team to team for a while now which was hurting that for me, and now the league basically gave the teams on the other side motivation to tear their teams apart too.

Like I can see why, in a basketball sense, OKC vs. MIN or NYK vs. IND should be fun series. But meh, it's just not compelling for me. And neither was BOS-DAL in the finals last year or BOS-IND/MIN-DAL either. Sure, I was interest because my team was in it, but for quite a while now once the Celtics have been eliminated, I simply don't find the rest of the playoffs compelling enough to really get into. I'll put it on in the background or at least catch highlights and watch a few breakdowns, but I just don't find it super interesting to watch unless I look up while doing other things and see it's close in the 4th quarter.


I don't agree with everything above but I agree with your general point that the NBA CBA is likely going to break up a lot of championship squads and contenders. The NBA isn't the NFL in which fans just root for the jersey and are indifferent to basically everyone on the club but the QB.

NBA fans identify with the players on the roster. I'm very skeptical in the aggregate it will help the NBA if in 2025 the Celtics have to trade core players. The evidence we do have supports the idea fans prefer dynasties in basketball not parity.

And the current CBA is going to lead to more "KG in Minnesota" situations in which an ATG is stuck on a **** team that can't fix itself. We have two of em already in Milwaukee and Denver. It sucks.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,898
And1: 13,702
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#149 » by sp6r=underrated » Tue May 20, 2025 9:47 pm

life_saver wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:We're in the transition period from less restrictions to more restrictions.

This time was always going to feel the worst.

In a few years we would have adjusted contracts to the new CBA and it won't feel as bad as this

Yep...I don't know why people are ignoring this part. If Nuggets for example knew about the new CBA 3-4 years ago, then they probably would have acted differently..especially, I am not sure MPJ could have gotten a max in that scenario


The players get a set percentage of basketball related income. Every NBA team has to hit the salary floor by the first day of the season.

Since the CBA caps maximum salaries and rookie salaries the money has to flow to the MPJ of the world because you're not allowed to spend it on rookies or superstars but you have to spend it on someone.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#150 » by NO-KG-AI » Tue May 20, 2025 9:49 pm

reload141 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Patches Perry wrote:It's going to become very difficult to win a championship without really impactful players on rookie deals, or guys taking big pay cuts.

Perhaps it's my bias as an OKC fan but I wish players that a team drafted only counted as a smaller percentage against the cap. This would incentivize homegrown teams rather than free agency heavy ones. If you draft and develop a player, you should see some kind of discount against the cap for retaining them.


The problem is that neither Hartenstein nor Caruso are home grown and the Thunder signed or extended both guys knowing those rookie contracts don't last forever.


This. I know being an OKC fan and seeing the CBA is frustrating because you’ve made amazing pick ups in the draft and that should be rewarded.

But reality is, it’s a 2-3 year window to really dominate the league and reel off a few championships, after that Chet and maybe even JDub are gone but you’ll get draft capital in return and with how you’ve been picking at the draft, it’s not all doom and gloom.


It’s sort of like it’s always been. If you do it right, you keep 2 maybe 3 guys at the top end, and you replinish talent around them every few years and have a few windows of dominance with pockets of years where you are still good and have a puncher’s chance.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 44,153
And1: 20,203
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#151 » by NO-KG-AI » Tue May 20, 2025 9:50 pm

Also, the Thunder’s best player wasn’t drafted by them, and neither was the guy they traded for him.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,269
And1: 20,743
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#152 » by AussieBuck » Tue May 20, 2025 10:11 pm

It sucks if you operate under this CBA like you're still governed by previous ones. Teams will figure it out.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,621
And1: 43,867
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#153 » by zimpy27 » Tue May 20, 2025 10:19 pm

sp6r=underrated wrote:
life_saver wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:We're in the transition period from less restrictions to more restrictions.

This time was always going to feel the worst.

In a few years we would have adjusted contracts to the new CBA and it won't feel as bad as this

Yep...I don't know why people are ignoring this part. If Nuggets for example knew about the new CBA 3-4 years ago, then they probably would have acted differently..especially, I am not sure MPJ could have gotten a max in that scenario


The players get a set percentage of basketball related income. Every NBA team has to hit the salary floor by the first day of the season.

Since the CBA caps maximum salaries and rookie salaries the money has to flow to the MPJ of the world because you're not allowed to spend it on rookies or superstars but you have to spend it on someone.



Well that's not true, teams don't have any problem meeting salary floor in the NBA.

Money is mismanaged if it goes to MPJs as a max. They paid him the max because they wanted the 5 years locked in as they thought he was an all star on the rise.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,841
And1: 9,180
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#154 » by JujitsuFlip » Tue May 20, 2025 10:30 pm

Ducklett wrote:
HawksVictory wrote:Cba is great, saved us from endless LeBron and Warriors finals. Small market teams actually have a chance now, and rich teams can't just buy the title

Compare this with the Dodgers and baseball, where the season is already over for half the league.


This is one of the reasons I have never cared about MLB. Even during the one or two years my home team was actually good (they always suck), I just couldn't give two caps because said team never spends money so they never have a real chance.
You've gotta be a Reds fan, sounds spot on for the Castellini's lol
User avatar
Ducklett
General Manager
Posts: 8,057
And1: 5,509
Joined: Jul 17, 2012
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#155 » by Ducklett » Tue May 20, 2025 10:42 pm

JujitsuFlip wrote:
Ducklett wrote:
HawksVictory wrote:Cba is great, saved us from endless LeBron and Warriors finals. Small market teams actually have a chance now, and rich teams can't just buy the title

Compare this with the Dodgers and baseball, where the season is already over for half the league.


This is one of the reasons I have never cared about MLB. Even during the one or two years my home team was actually good (they always suck), I just couldn't give two caps because said team never spends money so they never have a real chance.
You've gotta be a Reds fan, sounds spot on for the Castellini's lol


Close! Four letter word that starts with R.
sp6r=underrated
RealGM
Posts: 20,898
And1: 13,702
Joined: Jan 20, 2007
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#156 » by sp6r=underrated » Tue May 20, 2025 10:58 pm

zimpy27 wrote:
sp6r=underrated wrote:
life_saver wrote:Yep...I don't know why people are ignoring this part. If Nuggets for example knew about the new CBA 3-4 years ago, then they probably would have acted differently..especially, I am not sure MPJ could have gotten a max in that scenario


The players get a set percentage of basketball related income. Every NBA team has to hit the salary floor by the first day of the season.

Since the CBA caps maximum salaries and rookie salaries the money has to flow to the MPJ of the world because you're not allowed to spend it on rookies or superstars but you have to spend it on someone.



Well that's not true, teams don't have any problem meeting salary floor in the NBA.

Money is mismanaged if it goes to MPJs as a max. They paid him the max because they wanted the 5 years locked in as they thought he was an all star on the rise.



Teams hit the floor by giving out bad contracts. If every NBA team adopted the mindset we're not going to overpay veteran free agents most NBA teams would have massive problems filling out their roster and hitting the salary floor.

The reason it would be a massive problem is the CBA requires most free agents to get paid above production due to the constraints on paying rookie and superstars their true value.
Patches Perry
RealGM
Posts: 13,330
And1: 18,624
Joined: May 11, 2016
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#157 » by Patches Perry » Tue May 20, 2025 11:04 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Patches Perry wrote:It's going to become very difficult to win a championship without really impactful players on rookie deals, or guys taking big pay cuts.

Perhaps it's my bias as an OKC fan but I wish players that a team drafted only counted as a smaller percentage against the cap. This would incentivize homegrown teams rather than free agency heavy ones. If you draft and develop a player, you should see some kind of discount against the cap for retaining them.


The problem is that neither Hartenstein nor Caruso are home grown and the Thunder signed or extended both guys knowing those rookie contracts don't last forever.


I'm aware that Hartenstein and Caruso aren't homegrown, but Dub, Chet, Wallace, Wiggins, Jwill are and arguably Dort (undrafted but started his career with OKC on a two way deal).

Thats 5-6 of their top 8-9 rotation players.
Lockdown504090
RealGM
Posts: 11,851
And1: 12,713
Joined: Nov 24, 2015
         

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#158 » by Lockdown504090 » Tue May 20, 2025 11:09 pm

Supermax money should not count towards the cap in any way if they are on the team that drafted them. I dont see how jokic and giannis leaving their teams makes the league better.
Patches Perry
RealGM
Posts: 13,330
And1: 18,624
Joined: May 11, 2016
 

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#159 » by Patches Perry » Tue May 20, 2025 11:10 pm

reload141 wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Patches Perry wrote:It's going to become very difficult to win a championship without really impactful players on rookie deals, or guys taking big pay cuts.

Perhaps it's my bias as an OKC fan but I wish players that a team drafted only counted as a smaller percentage against the cap. This would incentivize homegrown teams rather than free agency heavy ones. If you draft and develop a player, you should see some kind of discount against the cap for retaining them.


The problem is that neither Hartenstein nor Caruso are home grown and the Thunder signed or extended both guys knowing those rookie contracts don't last forever.


This. I know being an OKC fan and seeing the CBA is frustrating because you’ve made amazing pick ups in the draft and that should be rewarded.

But reality is, it’s a 2-3 year window to really dominate the league and reel off a few championships, after that Chet and maybe even JDub are gone but you’ll get draft capital in return and with how you’ve been picking at the draft, it’s not all doom and gloom.


That is the reality yes, I was speaking on the ought.

The current CBA incentivizes player movement in order to balance talent disparities, and it kills player-fan relationship continuity. Pros and cons I guess.
Johnny Tomala
Analyst
Posts: 3,555
And1: 2,528
Joined: May 04, 2017
     

Re: This CBA sucks 

Post#160 » by Johnny Tomala » Tue May 20, 2025 11:10 pm

The second apron rules are too strict but Celtics were way too stupid to sign overrated Jrue to extension.

Return to The General Board