Godymas wrote:Wolveswin wrote:Godymas wrote:
Daniels would not be in place of NAW, every time these trade deals come up everyone just assumes teams have to give their best assets out the door to land a disgruntled star when literally every single time a major star has been moved he's gone out for much less players than you would think.
Harden went to Brooklyn for Jarrett Allen, Taurean Prince, and Caris LeVert
KD went to Phoenix for Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson and Jae Crowder
no team has to give up every single good player to make the deal, the picks are what matters most of the time.
just look at the list:
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/34277696/ranking-some-biggest-trades-two-decades-how-inform-kevin-durant-future
Literal superstars in their prime traded for guys who were forgotten within a year
so no, Daniels would not be sent out, NAW would be the best they can get because Risascher would be the rebuilding piece and Porzingis and NAW would be money and assets.
If you want the Bucks to laugh you off the phone. Sure.
Otherwise Daniels instead of NAW is required. And all those picks you didn’t list.
why would the Bucks laugh off the phone, when you have a list of 15 superstar trades that prove otherwise.
I don't get it, you're presented with overwhelming evidence of the opposite and yet you double down, it's kind of sad really.
It’s not my fault your original offer sucked - included no picks - and when called out responded with ‘assumed.’ Even with picks, your offer isn’t great. Not even borderline top 3 in this thread.




















