Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
EtchenBa wrote:Kerrsed wrote:EtchenBa wrote:Flagrant fouls are for unnecessary and/or excessive contact.. Amare's was non contact, Bayless's was contact.
Fixed!
Read the NBA rules
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_12.html?nav=ArticleList
Ok, so then can we agree that NEITHER should be called a flagrant?
Banks2Pierce wrote:Too many weak touch fouls.
MarJJMar wrote:God how terrible are we playing, Barbosa has been horrendous. How many 2nd chances do we give the Blazers.
Total lack of killer instinct from the Suns.
SharoneWright wrote:I would not trade Bargs for Roy.
Monster or no.
i said it. And I live in a flame retardent suit.
Cro_Ruption wrote:MarJJMar wrote:God how terrible are we playing, Barbosa has been horrendous. How many 2nd chances do we give the Blazers.
Total lack of killer instinct from the Suns.
il give u rudy for barbosa
Jimmy76 wrote:Cro_Ruption wrote:MarJJMar wrote:God how terrible are we playing, Barbosa has been horrendous. How many 2nd chances do we give the Blazers.
Total lack of killer instinct from the Suns.
il give u rudy for barbosa
deal
SharoneWright wrote:I would not trade Bargs for Roy.
Monster or no.
i said it. And I live in a flame retardent suit.
Cro_Ruption wrote:really? barbosa is so much better imo
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
