dygaction wrote:eyeatoma wrote:dygaction wrote:
Remember how Jokic won MVP as #6 seed over Embiid? Voters knew he won more games (46 vs. Embiid 45) albeit had much worse support. Spinners can enjoy more winning when their favorable players rest and team win, or claim winning when the team loss to highlight the "mvp". Both are wrong. The max player provided cap space hold and negative values during those win or loss.
They didn't give a **** about the games played. They gave it to him because he dragged a lottery team to the playoffs. Although Embiid had great stats too, and they had a better record.
You really think 1 more game won, is going to swing an MVP vote lol.
Weird hill to die on.
They (76ers) had a better record, Embiid did not, so there really was no case to be made.
Last year Jokic had 48 win, Embiid had 43 win. That's why so many people thought it was a robbery. At least you need to understand where people are coming from.
You can only play the games you are able to play. Embiid missed time. No, people thought that it was a robbery because he averaged a near triple double. Embiid didn't take time off the last month and Jokic did. It's a narrative award, obviously stats matter, and sure wins matter, but when it's neck and neck in everything else, and one is trying his hardest and the other is coasting it's not very hard to see why Embiid won. Also to claim a robbery would make it seem like the vote was close. It wasn't, Embiid won by a landslide. You keep harping about this stuff, but if it truly mattered, the voters would have accounted for it more, but that vote shows they didn't.
In the end Embiid played 66 games, Joker 69 (lol). It's not that deep, and that is not a huge disparity.
This is seriously nitpicking to the highest level.