Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Tied 2-2

Moderators: Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285

Hawks, Bucks, Bawks, or Hucks?

Hawks sweep
6
4%
Hawks in 5
6
4%
Hawks in 6
25
15%
Hawks in 7
8
5%
Bucks in 5
69
41%
Bucks in 6
51
30%
Bucks in 7
4
2%
 
Total votes: 169

User avatar
GSP
RealGM
Posts: 19,572
And1: 16,050
Joined: Dec 12, 2011
     

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1541 » by GSP » Tue Jun 29, 2021 11:59 pm

bwgood77 wrote:
PrinceAli wrote:Alright not even gonna bother watching this one

What an unfortunate postseason with all the injuries


No chance for a "Ewing theory" game?


We're been seeing that theory on the Clippers for a while now :wink:
Black Mage
Head Coach
Posts: 6,077
And1: 5,733
Joined: Feb 24, 2017
       

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1542 » by Black Mage » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:00 am

Trae showed his true colors. Pretends to be a tough guy, but he's just a wimp. Little bruise and he sits, meanwhile Embiid played 8 games on a torn meniscus and he carried a lot more weight on his joints.
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,775
And1: 3,326
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1543 » by jimmybones » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:00 am

NekiEcko wrote:
jimmybones wrote:The mri showed nothing, bone bruising is a pain tolerance issue but nothing structurally compromised. To not even try to be on the floor for your team even as a decoy was a choice and a pretty soft one.


and how do you know about the MRI, besides we are not in his shoes right now. He knows his body better than us. Besides we are not doctors.


Because the injury is reported as a “bone bruise.” That’s a vague way to say it hurts but isn’t structurally damaged. There’s no bone or ligament damage or it would have been reported as such.

If the mri showed anything it would have been him out weeks at minimum, not a “game time decision” where he tested it and chose against it.
Billy Goat
Analyst
Posts: 3,344
And1: 1,804
Joined: Mar 08, 2017
 

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1544 » by Billy Goat » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:03 am

NekiEcko wrote:
Billy Goat wrote:He's sitting a conference finals game with a bone bruise? wat


Maybe he should go out there and play maybe hurt himself more


Or he could suit up and play?
NekiEcko
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,435
And1: 336
Joined: Nov 30, 2011
         

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1545 » by NekiEcko » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:04 am

jimmybones wrote:
NekiEcko wrote:
jimmybones wrote:The mri showed nothing, bone bruising is a pain tolerance issue but nothing structurally compromised. To not even try to be on the floor for your team even as a decoy was a choice and a pretty soft one.


and how do you know about the MRI, besides we are not in his shoes right now. He knows his body better than us. Besides we are not doctors.


Because the injury is reported as a “bone bruise.” That’s a vague way to say it hurts but isn’t structurally damaged. There’s no bone or ligament damage or it would have been reported as such.

If the mri showed anything it would have been him out weeks at minimum, not a “game time decision” where he tested it and chose against it.


Like i say, we are just guess here but it is smart to stay off it and see what happens (I had that in the military and didnt listen, I was having surgery for it). Right now the Hawks is not in the their window yet and I think that he should stay off it.
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,775
And1: 3,326
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1546 » by jimmybones » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:04 am

Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:The mri showed nothing, bone bruising is a pain tolerance issue but nothing structurally compromised. To not even try to be on the floor for your team even as a decoy was a choice and a pretty soft one.

It’s easy to say but for someone like him who uses his shiftiness to his advantage, constantly driving and putting pressure on defenses, that pain is probably unbearable especially for his particular style of play.

Harden played decoy, partly because this was his one shot at a ring and probably wanted to atleast lens KD moral support. Everybody else like Kawhi and Trae are probably sitting for their own good


Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 100,442
And1: 74,324
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1547 » by djsunyc » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:05 am

screw the asterisk, this year's champ gets this next to their name:

Image
Hardenstepback
Pro Prospect
Posts: 767
And1: 807
Joined: Feb 12, 2021

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1548 » by Hardenstepback » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:06 am

jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:The mri showed nothing, bone bruising is a pain tolerance issue but nothing structurally compromised. To not even try to be on the floor for your team even as a decoy was a choice and a pretty soft one.

It’s easy to say but for someone like him who uses his shiftiness to his advantage, constantly driving and putting pressure on defenses, that pain is probably unbearable especially for his particular style of play.

Harden played decoy, partly because this was his one shot at a ring and probably wanted to atleast lens KD moral support. Everybody else like Kawhi and Trae are probably sitting for their own good


Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different
Sedale Threatt
RealGM
Posts: 51,237
And1: 45,850
Joined: Feb 06, 2007
Location: Clearing space in the trophy case.

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1550 » by Sedale Threatt » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:09 am

Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:It’s easy to say but for someone like him who uses his shiftiness to his advantage, constantly driving and putting pressure on defenses, that pain is probably unbearable especially for his particular style of play.

Harden played decoy, partly because this was his one shot at a ring and probably wanted to atleast lens KD moral support. Everybody else like Kawhi and Trae are probably sitting for their own good


Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different


Some of these dudes have obviously never had a foot injury before. I had some kind of bone bruising/sprained big toe a couple of years ago and it was excruciating; I could barely walk for a good week. It's not like getting a bruise on your arm or something. The foot is a completely different ballgame and it doesn't take much to F the whole thing up.
jimmybones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,775
And1: 3,326
Joined: May 29, 2009
Location: MKE
     

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1551 » by jimmybones » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:11 am

Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:It’s easy to say but for someone like him who uses his shiftiness to his advantage, constantly driving and putting pressure on defenses, that pain is probably unbearable especially for his particular style of play.

Harden played decoy, partly because this was his one shot at a ring and probably wanted to atleast lens KD moral support. Everybody else like Kawhi and Trae are probably sitting for their own good


Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different


I see it every day, I work in injury rehab, I work with athletes. In my opinion, it’s a soft decision. There’s no risk of making this specific ailment worse, it just hurts while you’re doing it. Could it effect his explosiveness, yeah, definitely. But to not even give it a go, sheesh.
Billy Goat
Analyst
Posts: 3,344
And1: 1,804
Joined: Mar 08, 2017
 

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1552 » by Billy Goat » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:11 am

Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:It’s easy to say but for someone like him who uses his shiftiness to his advantage, constantly driving and putting pressure on defenses, that pain is probably unbearable especially for his particular style of play.

Harden played decoy, partly because this was his one shot at a ring and probably wanted to atleast lens KD moral support. Everybody else like Kawhi and Trae are probably sitting for their own good


Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different


If it's not ligament damage then in a game of this magnitude you play through it. Sitting this game out with a bruise is baffling.
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,794
And1: 13,165
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1553 » by jayu70 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:14 am

GSP wrote:
PrinceAli wrote:
bwgood77 wrote:
No chance for a "Ewing theory" game?

Led by who? Bogdanovic?


They beat them without Trae or Hunter in the Rs led by Bogdan


True, but this Bogi is dragging that leg from a bum knee.
chrismikayla
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,147
And1: 2,991
Joined: Jun 16, 2014

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1554 » by chrismikayla » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:18 am

If there was any way Trae could play he would. All this other talk is nonsense


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
[gfycat][/gfycat]
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 28,305
And1: 15,814
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: The Land of Giannis.
     

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1555 » by rilamann » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:20 am

Ankle injuries can be weird. I sprained my ankle where it was more like a tweak, not that bad, and I couldn't walk for a week. Another time I sprained my ankle like Kyrie where I was literally standing on my ankle for a split second, and was fine the next day like it never happened.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
JerryWest_44
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 327
Joined: Jan 29, 2019
       

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1556 » by JerryWest_44 » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:20 am

why watch this body bag game?
Patches Perry
RealGM
Posts: 13,570
And1: 18,983
Joined: May 11, 2016
 

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1557 » by Patches Perry » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:23 am

It's going to be tough without Trae, but I think he's been given too much credit for their success this season. He is their best player, but they're deep and have plenty of offensive weapons, and will still be competitive defensively. All it takes is Lou or Bog or Gallinari getting hot and their offense can stay competitive. Nate will have those guys ready. Bucks are usually not an explosive offensive team (and are damn near unbeatable when they are) so they'll likely leave the door open.
dautjazz
RealGM
Posts: 15,300
And1: 10,068
Joined: Aug 01, 2001
Location: Miami, FL
 

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1558 » by dautjazz » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:24 am

jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different


I see it every day, I work in injury rehab, I work with athletes. In my opinion, it’s a soft decision. There’s no risk of making this specific ailment worse, it just hurts while you’re doing it. Could it effect his explosiveness, yeah, definitely. But to not even give it a go, sheesh.
So I guess Trae just wants to hand the Bucks a win? Come on man.
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.

by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53

im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
User avatar
Texas Chuck
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 92,908
And1: 99,593
Joined: May 19, 2012
Location: Purgatory
   

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1559 » by Texas Chuck » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:26 am

jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different


I see it every day, I work in injury rehab, I work with athletes. In my opinion, it’s a soft decision. There’s no risk of making this specific ailment worse, it just hurts while you’re doing it. Could it effect his explosiveness, yeah, definitely. But to not even give it a go, sheesh.
"


Curious how your employer feels about you practicing medicine over the internet with a patient you haven't examined. Citing your "credentials" loses all credibility when you do that lol. You have no idea but that doesn't stop you from judging Trae sight unseen.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Hardenstepback
Pro Prospect
Posts: 767
And1: 807
Joined: Feb 12, 2021

Re: Eastern Conference Finals: (3) Bucks vs. (5) Hawks, Part 2 | Bucks lead 2-1 

Post#1560 » by Hardenstepback » Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:27 am

jimmybones wrote:
Hardenstepback wrote:
jimmybones wrote:
Harden playing through soft tissue damage was riskier than someone playing through bone bruising. Its not an injury that is a risk of getting worse, like hardens was.


I just think calling him soft is unfair. Pain is probably too unbearable for him. Everyone’s pain tolerance is different


I see it every day, I work in injury rehab, I work with athletes. In my opinion, it’s a soft decision. There’s no risk of making this specific ailment worse, it just hurts while you’re doing it. Could it effect his explosiveness, yeah, definitely. But to not even give it a go, sheesh.

I’m not saying you don’t know what you are talking about, you likely know that side more than I do if that’s your field of work, but I think we both agree that it’s about how much pain he could tolerate/work through. If he can only tolerate so much pain then what? All the tweets/info suggest he wanted to play, tried to see what could do but it just didn’t work for now atleast. Maybe game 6 is different

Return to The General Board