ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:My only question is why didn't Philly keep Payton?
If you're trading MCW because his bad shooting is a problem, Payton is not exactly your solution.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:My only question is why didn't Philly keep Payton?
NYSixersFan wrote:
the plan is to get as good as quickly as possible....I fully believe we could have been a borderline playoff team last year by adding young veterans....using or draft picks and cap space.....can I specifically tell you who? no.
Smirkin Dirk wrote:Da1RealRapsFan wrote:Mik317 wrote:
Lets do this slowly.
KJ walks = philly loses and asset for nothing in return
Trade KJ = get an asset in return.
A team is at risk of losing any player (or an asset, as you refer to them) if they get good. The goal is to find players who will get good; you want to be at risk off losing them because that means they are good enough for other teams to want.
So Philly has 4 million 2nd round picks. If one of them is as good as McDaniels, you'll just trade him for another 2 2nd rounders because, apparently, this is how you treat 'assets'.
This is just a cycle of mediocroty Hinkie has them in. He's playing NBA2K; the problem is that it's a real team, with real fans and real players.
He won't win anything because he is always playing for a future that will never come.
The team will be sold and re-located.
BullyKing wrote:ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:My only question is why didn't Philly keep Payton?
If you're trading MCW because his bad shooting is a problem, Payton is not exactly your solution.
LloydFree wrote:majortom71 wrote:
The revolving door keeps spinning.
2 years from 2 years....etc.
The nerve. Orlando is on its 3rd year of less than 25 wins.
Slava wrote:
WHo the hell would pay $8 mil to McDaniels? .
reignfire wrote:Some people think Hinkie is following the Spurs/OKC model, but in reality, Hinkie/Morey has created a new branch of GMing a basketball franchise.
A sh-t new branch mind you, but still a new branch.
Players as assets. Coaching doesn't matter. Every player has a WAR(wins above replacement). All you do collect guys with high WARs, combine them, now you are on your way to contending! Chemistry, fit, continuity; these things don't exist. No such thing as getting "hot" when shooting the basketball. Only 3s and Layups, no one knew those were great shots until Morey came into the NBA apparently.
The worst thing about all of this is that Sixers fans are some of the most arrogant. Hinkie has done absolutely NOTHING except bottom dwell and he's the genius, outsmarting the entire league. RIGHT.
laploutocratie wrote:GallagherArt wrote:laploutocratie wrote:
Sure, then they can waste 10 more years trading for potential cornerstones which you speak of. By your logic, then every team should be dumping every non-cornerstone player less than 2 years into their professional careers for more draft picks.
Hinkie has enough draft picks to continue to build his team. Who said he has to build it around KJ and MCW? One's a rookie and the other is a sophomore. You don't just dump those young players with great promise for complete unknowns.
MCW great promise...laploutocratie wrote:Not only is MCW's play trash, his body language is as well.
Great promise...laploutocratie wrote:MCW is absolutely terrible. Chucker that can't shoot.
Great promise...
It's going to be humorous witnessing this boards perceptions of MCW change now that he's been traded. To clarify, I do believe MCW does have great promise, which I have since he was drafted.
His play has been horrible this season. But, promise =/= evaluation of current play. Promise reflects potential to play well, which is forward-looking. While I still don't like him nor what I perceive to be the empty stats he puts up, I think he has great promise. Nice try though, and I'm not surprised that this is coming from you, as you've historically had a problem with what I've said about your Sixers.
Mik317 wrote:It will be interesting to see how the team reacts to today's moves. Brown included.
Noel and MCW were great friends allegedly...how does he handle it?
Its easy to preach hard work and development....but it becomes harder when said hard work and development gets your ass on the first plane out of town. Nothing happens in a vaccume....future draft picks and agents will be wary with dealing with a team that doesn't give any **** about you and will ship your ass out at the drop of a hat.
This is a business, yes and it's all apart of that...but suddenly the hardworking, never give up environment I thought we were creating...seems like a sham. This is exactly what Charles and other anit analytic dudes were talking about..Hinkie is treating these dudes like numbers on a grid instead of actual people.
Whether or not it is a bad deal depends on who we draft with our pick and the Lakers pick (kinda like the Jrue deal that kinda sorta worked out so far)...but I wonder if this harms our rep with the people that matter (not the outside fans and not even our own fans...most are flip floppers anyway) but the players and more importantly..their agents. They can't be pleased with today's outcome for MCW and KJ. Morey is already feeling the heat for this with Dragic but they have Harden...we have????? If we get good this won't matter but yeesh.
Mik317 wrote:It will be interesting to see how the team reacts to today's moves. Brown included.
Noel and MCW were great friends allegedly...how does he handle it?
Its easy to preach hard work and development....but it becomes harder when said hard work and development gets your ass on the first plane out of town. Nothing happens in a vaccume....future draft picks and agents will be wary with dealing with a team that doesn't give any **** about you and will ship your ass out at the drop of a hat.
This is a business, yes and it's all apart of that...but suddenly the hardworking, never give up environment I thought we were creating...seems like a sham. This is exactly what Charles and other anit analytic dudes were talking about..Hinkie is treating these dudes like numbers on a grid instead of actual people.
Whether or not it is a bad deal depends on who we draft with our pick and the Lakers pick (kinda like the Jrue deal that kinda sorta worked out so far)...but I wonder if this harms our rep with the people that matter (not the outside fans and not even our own fans...most are flip floppers anyway) but the players and more importantly..their agents. They can't be pleased with today's outcome for MCW and KJ. Morey is already feeling the heat for this with Dragic but they have Harden...we have????? If we get good this won't matter but yeesh.
mksp wrote:Mik317 wrote:It will be interesting to see how the team reacts to today's moves. Brown included.
Noel and MCW were great friends allegedly...how does he handle it?
Its easy to preach hard work and development....but it becomes harder when said hard work and development gets your ass on the first plane out of town. Nothing happens in a vaccume....future draft picks and agents will be wary with dealing with a team that doesn't give any **** about you and will ship your ass out at the drop of a hat.
This is a business, yes and it's all apart of that...but suddenly the hardworking, never give up environment I thought we were creating...seems like a sham. This is exactly what Charles and other anit analytic dudes were talking about..Hinkie is treating these dudes like numbers on a grid instead of actual people.
Whether or not it is a bad deal depends on who we draft with our pick and the Lakers pick (kinda like the Jrue deal that kinda sorta worked out so far)...but I wonder if this harms our rep with the people that matter (not the outside fans and not even our own fans...most are flip floppers anyway) but the players and more importantly..their agents. They can't be pleased with today's outcome for MCW and KJ. Morey is already feeling the heat for this with Dragic but they have Harden...we have????? If we get good this won't matter but yeesh.
We don't know what we don't know.
Was MCW putting in the work necessary to be great? Was he actually "developing"?
Maybe trading MCW serves notice to the rest of the team that anyone is on the table.
It's not like his jumper has improved in two years.
mksp wrote:The amount of stupid on this thread is awe inspiring.
If, at the beginning of the season, one were to broach an "MCW for the LAL 1-5 Protected 2015 First Round Pick" trade, that individual would have been laughed off the board. Inefficient! Chucker! Good Counting Stats on a Bad Team!
After over half a season during which he has regressed, posting a PER of 12.8, after 15.5 in his rookie year, Sam Hinkie manages to make exactly that trade.
That LAL pick is one of the best picks that have been traded in recent memory, and it was traded for MCW. Let that sink in.
And now all you guys come out of the woodwork spitting hellfire over some perceived shot at the basketball gods.
I like MCW. He will be a good player for Milwaukee. I don't understand the trade from the Suns' perspective, but I digress. No matter how you slice it, the Sixers absolutely got very good value for MCW.
Pretend like Hinkie doesn't have a plan all you want, but it's clear that he does. Just because you're too shortsighted, impatient or angry to see it doesn't make it false.
When the 2016 Sixers look like this*:
D'Angelo Russell
Mario Hezonja
Dario Saric
Nerlens Noel
Joel Embiid
With Jerami Grant, RJ Hunter, Robert Covington and Malik Pope coming off the bench, then maybe you'll understand.
*And clearly, we have no clue what the actual 2016 team will look like. But I can almost assure you that it will be built around Joel Embiid. Which reminds me that y'all only have another 30 games or so to use the "never played a game", "injured big man" narrative against him.
One last thing: Brett Brown is a great coach. The team was playing well (without MCW even), and they will continue to play hard throughout the rest of the season. The "losing culture" and "don't care about their players" narrative is another patently false one.