Inspektor1312 wrote:Freighttrain wrote:Inspektor1312 wrote:
You know that the Nuggets are just one win away from 4th seed and four wins away from 1st seed, right? It's the beginning of the season. You're acting like the Nuggets are 4-10 or something
You also realise they're one loss away from 11th in the standing and four from being last? It goes both ways. Records are what they are. They might be skewed during the pandemic but the Nuggets haven't been good enough to warrant a Jokic MVP contention.
That's exactly my point, it's too early in the season to make that big of a deal whether a team is 3rd or 9th in the conference when the difference is a couple of wins. Jokic has clearly been a top 5 player so far, and saying that you have to be on drugs to mention him in the MVP conversation is ridiculous.
I mean we're already at the 20% mark if I'm not mistaken. A lot can happen obviously, and Jokic's individual numbers are MVP worthy, but they desperately need someone else to step up. They're already at a point in the season where they need to rack up some consecutive wins in order to be within closing distance of the Lakers/Clippers, which isn't something you'd expect from Denver. Again, the schedule is skewed because of players missing etc,.. But that's just the way it is. I also don't see a case for Jokic as the MVP if Denver is 3rd in the standings tbf. Especially if that means they lost a spot compared to last year's season.













