EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [3-2 Hawks]
Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- NoDopeOnSundays
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,397
- And1: 57,007
- Joined: Nov 22, 2005
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
How do the Sixers not ask Embiid to limit the moves he tries, no way you should be doing a Euro with a torn meniscus.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
BeatDaCavs420
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,254
- And1: 22,630
- Joined: Mar 11, 2012
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
Doc you can't be serious to be bitching about that being a flagrant lmao stop it
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
damanick10
- Starter
- Posts: 2,435
- And1: 3,500
- Joined: May 28, 2017
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
Difference between this and Jokic is that it was to stop a score. Jokic just ran up to the dude and swiped him lol
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
DowJones
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,571
- And1: 7,563
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
Jokic really did get screwed.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
AussieCeltic
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,019
- And1: 24,234
- Joined: Jan 02, 2014
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
DowJones wrote:This has to be an ejection--right? This is just like the Joker play.
Not even close. He hits his arm.
New school nba is a flagrant 1. Old school is a playoff foul.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- TheSuzerain
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,423
- And1: 11,431
- Joined: Mar 29, 2012
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?
At least he was conceivably playing defense and not whacking someone 90 feet from the hoop. Makes it different.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
itrsteve
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,433
- And1: 11,036
- Joined: Nov 04, 2017
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?
They may send him to jail
[quote=“dkb964”]156-1 Celtics are frauds when pressure is put on them. They would have been toast if Luka was not stupid enough to foul himself out. Enjoy this ONE finals win. There will never be another with the Js and the Celtics cant afford stacked team.[/quote]
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
jokeboy86
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,410
- And1: 7,398
- Joined: May 08, 2007
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
I wonder are we going to get a Hawks/Bucks EC Finals because I’m cringing everytime Embiid hits the ground or jumps. Makes me worry everytime.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- NyKnicks1714
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,312
- And1: 28,626
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- grumpysaddle
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,030
- And1: 14,320
- Joined: Feb 22, 2009
- Location: San Diego
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?
Difference is that he didn't seem to hit him in the face, and it wasn't as much of a wind-up. Hard foul, but Jokic's was super unnecessary.

Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- Reeko
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 26,848
- And1: 39,276
- Joined: Jan 04, 2015
- Location: East side, in a deluxe apartment in the sky.
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
NyKnicks1714 wrote:I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.
The tennis player?
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
ckman
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,370
- And1: 2,291
- Joined: Jul 02, 2014
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
the NBA is so soft nowadays
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
zshawn10
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,416
- And1: 5,641
- Joined: Jul 27, 2015
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
Collins is filthy
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
jbk1234
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 59,555
- And1: 36,518
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- NyKnicks1714
- RealGM
- Posts: 26,312
- And1: 28,626
- Joined: Nov 20, 2001
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
Reeko wrote:NyKnicks1714 wrote:I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.
The tennis player?
Haha whoops. Close enough, not editing.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- Reeko
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 26,848
- And1: 39,276
- Joined: Jan 04, 2015
- Location: East side, in a deluxe apartment in the sky.
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
NyKnicks1714 wrote:Reeko wrote:NyKnicks1714 wrote:I hate when people compare fouls like this. The Djokovic foul is different, and no two fouls are the same.
The tennis player?
Haha whoops. Close enough, not editing.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
AussieCeltic
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,019
- And1: 24,234
- Joined: Jan 02, 2014
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
Trae has drawn 3 fouls this quarter just barrelling into the defensive player and chucking a shot up. Then whined that he hasn’t got FT’s. He must’ve seen Woj’s tweet about the crackdown next year and is doing everything he can to cheat now
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
-
Jedi32
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,773
- And1: 6,728
- Joined: Oct 30, 2014
- Location: Showtime Era
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
lol i knew some posters would whine about jokic after that foul. smh
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- beeshma
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,509
- And1: 1,910
- Joined: Mar 24, 2011
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
For the first time in my life, I feel like the way the NBA games are ref'd has made me dislike the product.
No hard fouls? What is this about a windup being important? I don't give a s***.
Drawing a 3 point foul is the most boring tactic of all time, and yet it absolutely dominates the way offense and defense are played.
No hard fouls? What is this about a windup being important? I don't give a s***.
Drawing a 3 point foul is the most boring tactic of all time, and yet it absolutely dominates the way offense and defense are played.
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
- BenoUdrihFTL
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,701
- And1: 23,490
- Joined: Feb 20, 2013
- Location: Papa John's
-
Re: EC | Rd. 2| (1) Sixers vs (5) Hawks, Part 2 [2-1 Sixers]
grumpysaddle wrote:BenoUdrihFTL wrote:So in keeping with last night's precedent, does Simmons get an F2 ejection here?
Difference is that he didn't seem to hit him in the face, and it wasn't as much of a wind-up. Hard foul, but Jokic's was super unnecessary.
Well the Simmons foul was ruled F1, so by definition of the rule it was deemed unnecessary. What elevates an F1 to an F2 is unnecessary AND excessive. I'd argue that body-checking Collins in midair was a bit excessive
1.61803398874989484820458683436563811772030917980576286
2135448622705260462818902449707207
204189391137484754088
0753868917521
26633862
22353
693
2135448622705260462818902449707207
204189391137484754088
0753868917521
26633862
22353
693






