Jadoogar wrote:Sixerscan wrote:Jadoogar wrote:
yea i really hated that trade. Rubio didn't help much last year but they whole season was a mess, i don't think you can learn anything from that. They should have given Rubio one more year.
Towns and Russell are old enough where they shouldn't need anyone to hold their hand to not be terrible. Paul helped the Suns get to the Finals but they were at least a mediocre team before he showed up.
you could argue Demar is doing the same for the Bulls. Teams should have some veterans if they want to win.
They added basically an entire new team around Lavine since last year's trade deadline. Garrett Temple and Thad Young are the definition of "veteran presences" and they didn't stop the Bulls from stinking for most of last year.
I'm not saying vets aren't important, you definitely need a good spread of veteran players to win in this league, but you shouldn't need a whole roster full of vets to not be terrible. My point is the Wolves have multiple guys in their mid 20s, on max contracts, that have made all star teams and probably consider themselves really good players, and I just don't think the vet leadership difference between Ricky Rubio and Patrick Beverly is why they're on pace to have a terrible record again.
I think the vet thing makes more sense for a team like the Cavs that are built around super young guys like Garland and Mobley. I thought guys like Redick, Belinelli and Ilyasova were important for Embiid and Simmons when they first started. But like, at this point I would just expect those guys (well, right now Embiid anyway, Simmons acting the way he has this year is also disappointing) to actually be a veteran that provides leadership for the younger players.