Hello Brooklyn wrote:wco81 wrote:With or without Kyrie, it doesn't seem likely that Nets could be a contender unless Simmons is All-NBA again.
So whether KI leaves and then KD too, is there going to be much difference in their prospects for the next few seasons?
And what would a 33 going on 34 year old KD fetch in a trade?
Not really sure why the Nets can't be a contender.
Bring back Joe Harris and Simmons. Add some better pieces.
They will still be a very good team with a full season of playing together.
Whats the alternative? Flounder to the bottom of the standings?
I just think the Celtics have taken a big step. Their core is still young and if they keep Horford for a couple more years (and he can remain effective at his age of course) and Williams doesn't have long-term knee problems, they look like a juggernaut.
Bucks should be tough as well, they have younger stars than the Nets.
So the point is, Celtics are going to keep improving while with KD, you're hoping Father Time doesn't catch up to him. Probably more prone to injuries too. That's what I'm worried about with the Warriors.
Sure a lot depends on Simmons and Harris and the oddsmakers are favoring the Nets too.
We will see. Question is whether they start the rebuild in 2-3 seasons or start thinking about it now. Given Kyrie big money is certainly not without risks. He'll likely be good through the next 4-5 years but will he be good enough?