Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
Dominator83
RealGM
Posts: 21,211
And1: 32,478
Joined: Jan 16, 2005
Location: NBA Hell

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Portland Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#161 » by Dominator83 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:18 am

Sprewell4Three wrote:At this pace Luka and Giannis going to be commanding 90 - 100 million a year


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In my fantasy league last year those 2 went for $90 and $80 in a $200 cap
Fantasy Hoops/Football/Baseball fans..

For info on a forum that actually talks Fantasy sports and not spammed with soliciting leagues, PM me. The more the merrier !
User avatar
BenoUdrihFTL
RealGM
Posts: 10,701
And1: 23,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2013
Location: Papa John's
 

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#162 » by BenoUdrihFTL » Sun Jul 10, 2022 2:55 pm

marcush wrote:Just seems unnecessary.

Already contracted for 3 seasons and showing clear signs of declining.

What is the worst thing that could happen to the Blazers if they just take some time to assess his form before giving out this deal?

Would it really be the worst thing if he demanded a trade?

I'm wondering if he didn't already demand a trade, and this extension was then the price Blazers had to pay to keep him content in Portland
1.61803398874989484820458683436563811772030917980576286
2135448622705260462818902449707207
204189391137484754088
0753868917521
26633862
22353
693
Jabroni Lames
Analyst
Posts: 3,746
And1: 4,284
Joined: Apr 08, 2018

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#163 » by Jabroni Lames » Sun Jul 10, 2022 3:06 pm

Loyalty FTW! RIP Blazers.
The Rainmaker
Rookie
Posts: 1,079
And1: 774
Joined: Jul 07, 2018

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#164 » by The Rainmaker » Sun Jul 10, 2022 4:15 pm

Good for Lillard for getting that money. I would've done the same.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,327
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#165 » by Sixerscan » Sun Jul 10, 2022 5:05 pm

jbk1234 wrote:
Tim Lehrbach wrote:Good job, Dame!

By virtue of collective bargaining and the provisions of the maximum salary, Dame already gives up value to the NBA's middle class and caps his salary so that the team can add more talent. I support him demanding -- and getting -- every reward available to him.

From the team's POV? We can't know their thinking, but I think Synciere evaluated the situation well.


People take this as an article of faith despite all the very prominent examples of it not being true I don't know what to say anymore. Dame isn't worth his current contract. I'm not being hyperbolic either. None of the other 29 teams would offer Dame almost $40M per coming off the season he just had.

You don’t think the Lakers would swap him for Westbrook’s expiring in a second? I think plenty of teams would give him 40 per if they had the means. May not be a good investment but neither is a lot of free agency.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,212
And1: 36,255
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#166 » by jbk1234 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 5:26 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
jbk1234 wrote:
Tim Lehrbach wrote:Good job, Dame!

By virtue of collective bargaining and the provisions of the maximum salary, Dame already gives up value to the NBA's middle class and caps his salary so that the team can add more talent. I support him demanding -- and getting -- every reward available to him.

From the team's POV? We can't know their thinking, but I think Synciere evaluated the situation well.


People take this as an article of faith despite all the very prominent examples of it not being true I don't know what to say anymore. Dame isn't worth his current contract. I'm not being hyperbolic either. None of the other 29 teams would offer Dame almost $40M per coming off the season he just had.

You don’t think the Lakers would swap him for Westbrook’s expiring in a second? I think plenty of teams would give him 40 per if they had the means. May not be a good investment but neither is a lot of free agency.


That he could be traded for one of, if not the worst contract in the NBA doesn't mean he could sign for his current deal on the open market.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Chessboxer
Analyst
Posts: 3,326
And1: 811
Joined: May 29, 2004

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#167 » by Chessboxer » Sun Jul 10, 2022 8:43 pm

Myth wrote:
deeppzz11 wrote:I’m all for sticking it out with the team and trying to win a championship in Portland. But you can’t go around and moan anymore about the franchise not being able to build a team around you. You are taking a huge portion of the salary cap with this extension. If you really wanted to win championshis, you’ll atleast take a small hit on your extension so the team has salary cap space to bring in another star etc.

What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.


Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.
" What I do is attack your ability. I don't have to stand over you and taunt you. You'll know when it's done that I'm better."

-Micheal Jordan
elias808
Junior
Posts: 366
And1: 371
Joined: Jul 31, 2015
 

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#168 » by elias808 » Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:01 pm

Chessboxer wrote:
Myth wrote:
deeppzz11 wrote:I’m all for sticking it out with the team and trying to win a championship in Portland. But you can’t go around and moan anymore about the franchise not being able to build a team around you. You are taking a huge portion of the salary cap with this extension. If you really wanted to win championshis, you’ll atleast take a small hit on your extension so the team has salary cap space to bring in another star etc.

What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.


Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.


Harden taking less recently is a prime example of this. In the NFL, Brady has frequently taken less money in order for the franchise to build a better team.

I’m not hating on Dame for getting his bag, but it’s very frustrating as a fan.
Myth
RealGM
Posts: 11,861
And1: 10,505
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#169 » by Myth » Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:09 pm

elias808 wrote:
Chessboxer wrote:
Myth wrote:What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.


Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.


Harden taking less recently is a prime example of this. In the NFL, Brady has frequently taken less money in order for the franchise to build a better team.

I’m not hating on Dame for getting his bag, but it’s very frustrating as a fan.

The Heat had an immediate plan and the 76ers are also close to that contention area, so saving money has a direct effect on those teams. If Blazers were near contention and missing a small piece with the savings or if Blazers said we can get Durant if you take less, I suspect he’d do it. But again, he’d need to take a crazy pay cut and then hope Portland is a free agent destination suddenly for the discount to have any effect. These situations are apples and oranges.
Courant
Sophomore
Posts: 164
And1: 188
Joined: Nov 22, 2021
       

And there you go 

Post#170 » by Courant » Mon Jul 11, 2022 12:15 am

LAL1947 wrote:Hahaha, insta worst contract in the league. I kinda feel badly for Portland fans tho. Their recent signings and the KD rumors probably gave them brief hope of contending... only for Dame to dash those hopes with this contract. I can't see other stars signing up to play along with him now... cos whatever they do to help Portland win, Dame will get all the credit while also earning double their dollars, lol. :P


Stephen Curry: Loses Game 7 of the NBA Finals, he and his teammates fly across the country to convince KD to join them.

Damian Lillard: Team is in the lottery, posts a picture of him and KD in Blazers jerseys, signs another salary cap-clogging contract.

But, hey: Dame "just wants to win."
User avatar
monopoman
RealGM
Posts: 12,633
And1: 6,455
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
     

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#171 » by monopoman » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:00 am

Chessboxer wrote:
Myth wrote:
deeppzz11 wrote:I’m all for sticking it out with the team and trying to win a championship in Portland. But you can’t go around and moan anymore about the franchise not being able to build a team around you. You are taking a huge portion of the salary cap with this extension. If you really wanted to win championshis, you’ll atleast take a small hit on your extension so the team has salary cap space to bring in another star etc.

What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.


Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.


Keep in mind that was before the big salary cap jump, so that was more like making $25 million today, they also had escalating pay on those contracts in LBJ's last year with the Heat he was up to $19 million. It also was more than $12 according to Sportrac the lowest he ever was paid to be on the Heat was $14.5 million.

It's also a lot easier to convince a star to take a slight pay decrease when you are trying to sign 3 star level players, it's a lot harder when it's more nebulous like oh maybe it will help us in the future.
Swish1906
Head Coach
Posts: 7,128
And1: 11,300
Joined: Apr 09, 2019
 

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#172 » by Swish1906 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:05 am

I think Dames agent went to the Blazers "give us this extension and he wont demand a trade"
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 18,019
And1: 19,692
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Portland Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#173 » by ForeverTFC » Mon Jul 11, 2022 1:52 am

NotAKnicksFan wrote:
Antinomy wrote:Luka or Giannis will almost certainly become the first $100M per year player, depending on how the next TV & streaming deal looks.


Does anyone have the tv deals, streaming deals etc yearly ?


Sorry if someone beat me to it but believe the current deal is about ~$2.5b a year while revenue is around ~$10b. NBA is trying to 3x the deal, assume they get ~2.5x, you have ~$6b per year, bringing revenue to $13.5b keeping all the other money constant. So cap would go up by 3.5/10=~35% in that case. ~$160m cap with the tax at ~~$190m. Crazy numbers.
NW BBALL
Sophomore
Posts: 167
And1: 147
Joined: Jun 27, 2016
   

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#174 » by NW BBALL » Mon Jul 11, 2022 2:03 am

Certainly a lot of money to pay an aging PG. But realistically in order for Portland to really “contend”, it would require a potentially painful rebuild and lucking into a generational player. Giannis and Steph have proved to be generational players that turned the fortunes of long flailing organizations but I don’t think anyone expected that of them on draft day. Philadelphia, Brooklyn, and Houston each went all in to become contenders in their own way but didn’t get any further than Portland did in 2019. New Orleans lucked into a pair of potentially generational players in AD and then Zion but one skipped to LA and the other I am confident will go down as a great “what if”. A player that is loyal to an organization is exceedingly rare in the league today. What that massive contract buys Portland is a player that will smash ever franchise record and remain a sports legend in the city for decades.
Dubnation
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,505
And1: 4,162
Joined: Nov 25, 2021
     

Re: And there you go 

Post#175 » by Dubnation » Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:05 am

Courant wrote:
LAL1947 wrote:Hahaha, insta worst contract in the league. I kinda feel badly for Portland fans tho. Their recent signings and the KD rumors probably gave them brief hope of contending... only for Dame to dash those hopes with this contract. I can't see other stars signing up to play along with him now... cos whatever they do to help Portland win, Dame will get all the credit while also earning double their dollars, lol. :P


Stephen Curry: Loses Game 7 of the NBA Finals, he and his teammates fly across the country to convince KD to join them.

Damian Lillard: Team is in the lottery, posts a picture of him and KD in Blazer jerseys, signs another salary cap-clogging contract.

But, hey: Dame "just wants to win."



Interesting perspective.
CS707
General Manager
Posts: 8,620
And1: 7,113
Joined: Dec 23, 2003

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#176 » by CS707 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:14 am

Portland is in a tough spot with Dame anyway. It’s unlikely they get value on him with a trade given the only teams that would go hard for him are playoff level teams and he’s got a couple of good years left himself. Those teams aren’t giving up rebuilding pieces and their draft picks are likely not worth much. Might as well just roll with him.
User avatar
monopoman
RealGM
Posts: 12,633
And1: 6,455
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
     

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#177 » by monopoman » Mon Jul 11, 2022 3:28 am

NW BBALL wrote:Certainly a lot of money to pay an aging PG. But realistically in order for Portland to really “contend”, it would require a potentially painful rebuild and lucking into a generational player. Giannis and Steph have proved to be generational players that turned the fortunes of long flailing organizations but I don’t think anyone expected that of them on draft day. Philadelphia, Brooklyn, and Houston each went all in to become contenders in their own way but didn’t get any further than Portland did in 2019. New Orleans lucked into a pair of potentially generational players in AD and then Zion but one skipped to LA and the other I am confident will go down as a great “what if”. A player that is loyal to an organization is exceedingly rare in the league today. What that massive contract buys Portland is a player that will smash ever franchise record and remain a sports legend in the city for decades.

Yep we sure as **** wont' have a Giannis level player seriously considering us in free agency. ****, even when Dame was in his prime we didn't hear a lot of talk about X star player wanting to be a Blazer. I think the only one was when Harden said he wouldn't mind being a Blazer just before he was traded to Brooklyn. That was a trade scenario though, who knows what he would have said if he was a free agent.

I would have loved to see an all-in move on Kawhi or something even as a 1 year rental back when he was being traded from the Spurs but our GM overvalued the Dame+CJ pairing. **** we probably could have gotten him for CJ+ one young player and a pick or two.
Case2012
Head Coach
Posts: 6,016
And1: 2,096
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#178 » by Case2012 » Mon Jul 11, 2022 8:03 am

He had one bad season in 10 years after not being able to ignore an injury he's been suffering from for 4 years and people think he's washed. His contract can't be more than 35% of the cap which is what he's making now. Steph will be 35 next season and he just won a fmvp. Does anyone actually use logic on here anymore? Sure it would be great if taking a pay cut meant being able to sign another star but no one wants to come here anyways. Harden, KD, LeBron etc all structured their deals so they could team up.
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
benhillboy
Starter
Posts: 2,022
And1: 1,935
Joined: Dec 02, 2018

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Blazers Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#179 » by benhillboy » Mon Jul 11, 2022 12:52 pm

Tough times for Blazers fans man I feel for y’all. I dug those Adleman teams and Brandon Roy was the man.

Fun fact: This upcoming season Lilliard is making more than twice what Terry Porter made in his career. Terry Porter had 7 career triple doubles. Lilliard has 1.

The blazers paid him $3M as a rookie to lead the league in minutes. Now they have to pay $60M when it’s literally impossible for him to lead the league in anything. Add in the possibility that Hart, Payton, and Grant are all gonna hate playing with a dude who never screens, cuts, or defends (and makes $18M more than they do combined) and it’s gonna get ugly sooner than later.
flow
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,706
And1: 2,869
Joined: Feb 18, 2016

Re: Shams: Dame Lillard, Portland Close to 2-Yr/$120M Max Extension 

Post#180 » by flow » Mon Jul 11, 2022 5:32 pm

Phystic wrote:
zshawn10 wrote:2022-23: $42m

2023-24: $46m

2024-25: $49m player option

2025-26: ~$59m

2026-27: ~$63m


Wait how would that PO work? Wouldn't thisget rid of the PO then?


Yes, the player option was exercised by signing the extension. '26/27 is now a player option.

Return to The General Board