Sprewell4Three wrote:At this pace Luka and Giannis going to be commanding 90 - 100 million a year
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In my fantasy league last year those 2 went for $90 and $80 in a $200 cap
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Sprewell4Three wrote:At this pace Luka and Giannis going to be commanding 90 - 100 million a year
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
marcush wrote:Just seems unnecessary.
Already contracted for 3 seasons and showing clear signs of declining.
What is the worst thing that could happen to the Blazers if they just take some time to assess his form before giving out this deal?
Would it really be the worst thing if he demanded a trade?

jbk1234 wrote:Tim Lehrbach wrote:Good job, Dame!
By virtue of collective bargaining and the provisions of the maximum salary, Dame already gives up value to the NBA's middle class and caps his salary so that the team can add more talent. I support him demanding -- and getting -- every reward available to him.
From the team's POV? We can't know their thinking, but I think Synciere evaluated the situation well.
People take this as an article of faith despite all the very prominent examples of it not being true I don't know what to say anymore. Dame isn't worth his current contract. I'm not being hyperbolic either. None of the other 29 teams would offer Dame almost $40M per coming off the season he just had.

Sixerscan wrote:jbk1234 wrote:Tim Lehrbach wrote:Good job, Dame!
By virtue of collective bargaining and the provisions of the maximum salary, Dame already gives up value to the NBA's middle class and caps his salary so that the team can add more talent. I support him demanding -- and getting -- every reward available to him.
From the team's POV? We can't know their thinking, but I think Synciere evaluated the situation well.
People take this as an article of faith despite all the very prominent examples of it not being true I don't know what to say anymore. Dame isn't worth his current contract. I'm not being hyperbolic either. None of the other 29 teams would offer Dame almost $40M per coming off the season he just had.
You don’t think the Lakers would swap him for Westbrook’s expiring in a second? I think plenty of teams would give him 40 per if they had the means. May not be a good investment but neither is a lot of free agency.
Myth wrote:deeppzz11 wrote:I’m all for sticking it out with the team and trying to win a championship in Portland. But you can’t go around and moan anymore about the franchise not being able to build a team around you. You are taking a huge portion of the salary cap with this extension. If you really wanted to win championshis, you’ll atleast take a small hit on your extension so the team has salary cap space to bring in another star etc.
What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.
Chessboxer wrote:Myth wrote:deeppzz11 wrote:I’m all for sticking it out with the team and trying to win a championship in Portland. But you can’t go around and moan anymore about the franchise not being able to build a team around you. You are taking a huge portion of the salary cap with this extension. If you really wanted to win championshis, you’ll atleast take a small hit on your extension so the team has salary cap space to bring in another star etc.
What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.
Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.
elias808 wrote:Chessboxer wrote:Myth wrote:What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.
Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.
Harden taking less recently is a prime example of this. In the NFL, Brady has frequently taken less money in order for the franchise to build a better team.
I’m not hating on Dame for getting his bag, but it’s very frustrating as a fan.
LAL1947 wrote:Hahaha, insta worst contract in the league. I kinda feel badly for Portland fans tho. Their recent signings and the KD rumors probably gave them brief hope of contending... only for Dame to dash those hopes with this contract. I can't see other stars signing up to play along with him now... cos whatever they do to help Portland win, Dame will get all the credit while also earning double their dollars, lol.
Chessboxer wrote:Myth wrote:deeppzz11 wrote:I’m all for sticking it out with the team and trying to win a championship in Portland. But you can’t go around and moan anymore about the franchise not being able to build a team around you. You are taking a huge portion of the salary cap with this extension. If you really wanted to win championshis, you’ll atleast take a small hit on your extension so the team has salary cap space to bring in another star etc.
What do you consider a small hit? He would need to take likely more than a 50% paycut for the team to have cap room in those seasons to add players, and more if he wants those players to be good.
Lebron/Wade took a paycut to form the Heatles, they were making like 12 mill/yr IIRC. Lillard isn’t half the player they are. Duncan took a paycut too. Lillard is entitled to take what he wants, but a lot of NBA fans don’t want to hear him whine about surrounding talent , when superior players have historically taken less money to win championships.
NotAKnicksFan wrote:Antinomy wrote:Luka or Giannis will almost certainly become the first $100M per year player, depending on how the next TV & streaming deal looks.
Does anyone have the tv deals, streaming deals etc yearly ?
Courant wrote:LAL1947 wrote:Hahaha, insta worst contract in the league. I kinda feel badly for Portland fans tho. Their recent signings and the KD rumors probably gave them brief hope of contending... only for Dame to dash those hopes with this contract. I can't see other stars signing up to play along with him now... cos whatever they do to help Portland win, Dame will get all the credit while also earning double their dollars, lol.
Stephen Curry: Loses Game 7 of the NBA Finals, he and his teammates fly across the country to convince KD to join them.
Damian Lillard: Team is in the lottery, posts a picture of him and KD in Blazer jerseys, signs another salary cap-clogging contract.
But, hey: Dame "just wants to win."
NW BBALL wrote:Certainly a lot of money to pay an aging PG. But realistically in order for Portland to really “contend”, it would require a potentially painful rebuild and lucking into a generational player. Giannis and Steph have proved to be generational players that turned the fortunes of long flailing organizations but I don’t think anyone expected that of them on draft day. Philadelphia, Brooklyn, and Houston each went all in to become contenders in their own way but didn’t get any further than Portland did in 2019. New Orleans lucked into a pair of potentially generational players in AD and then Zion but one skipped to LA and the other I am confident will go down as a great “what if”. A player that is loyal to an organization is exceedingly rare in the league today. What that massive contract buys Portland is a player that will smash ever franchise record and remain a sports legend in the city for decades.

Phystic wrote:zshawn10 wrote:2022-23: $42m
2023-24: $46m
2024-25: $49m player option
2025-26: ~$59m
2026-27: ~$63m
Wait how would that PO work? Wouldn't thisget rid of the PO then?