Bob8 wrote:old skool wrote:I'm not so sure that Dallas is a BIG winner.dc wrote:Mavs were big winners. Dramatically increased their title shot w/o giving up a motherlode of assets. Suns are also winners going all in on a title as well, but they definitely gave up an eyewatering amount of assets.
Everybody else in comparison is pretty meh. Nets you can obviously call losers, but they had no choice but to blow it all up and at least they got assets back.
They added a ton of talent, but that added talent has not been translating into playoff success.
Irving is in his 12th NBA season and has only got his team into the playoffs 6 times. He has not advanced past the 2nd round since 2016-17. In the last 6 seasons he has wallowed in controversy on underachieving teams that were disappointing playoff exits. The addictive allure of Kyrie's highlight reel talent has not brought his team any meaningful playoff success since he forced his way out of Cleveland.
Dinwiddie without Luka 0:7. Kyrie without Luka 2:0. That's all we have to know about the trade. And Green playing a class better than DFS with his minutes.
So if the Mavs have a better record in the regular season and lose in the playoffs and Kyrie leaves it was a good trade? I don't think anyone is questioning that Kyrie is a huge talent upgrade over Dinwiddie.