Your failure to address my question underscores the flaw in the OP.SNPA wrote:zimpy27 wrote:old skool wrote:What is there about the "new" rival league that would make them more successful at offering $250-million salaries to concentrate star talent than any other league that is also not encumbered by a salary cap?
The absence of a salary cap is floated here as the huge advantage that could prey on an NBA vulnerability. But that "advantage" is shared by every other basketball league in the world. It is surely not unique.
It's the concentration of talent that matters.
You add a $200m player to one of those leagues and you get talent dilution. It's a gimmick.
You get $200m player on each of 6 teams playing off against each other to crown the best, it's a sport you want to watch.
This is it IMO.
Let’s say 6x200m on average. 1.2billion and you can have the top six players. They are looking to raise 5 billion.
NBA headquarters and team owners must be sweating this.
There is nothing preventing any basketball league in the world from offering players $250-million salaries. The NBA is likely the only league with a salary cap.
Starting a new league without a cap is not earth shattering. It is not a new threat.
Raising $5-Billion would not be earth shattering.
Seeking investors is ....... literally nothing. Happens every day.