shrink wrote:
Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
shrink wrote:
MikRay wrote:shrink wrote:
Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5


ReggiesKnicks wrote:MikRay wrote:shrink wrote:
Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5
Post Objective stats
"What a homer!"
I'm a Thunder fan. I've hated the Lakers since the day I started watching basketball, most annoying fans on the planet with the Cowboys a close 2nd, always babied by the refs and the NBA and they're the main topic of discussion even when they aren't relevant. The Wolves are the Thunders rivals and have voiced their dislike for Shai, so **** em.Wargreymon wrote:WestbrookGOATed wrote:Wolves in 6. Lakers have no bigs. Wish they could both lose.
Look at this ray of sunshine...
cupcakesnake wrote:Watching the post-trade Lakers, I don't think it's going to be our size that messes them up. The Lakers play a ton of big wing and power forward sized dudes (Rui, Lebron, Luka, DFS, Vando) who are strong, and paint protection is their #1 goal. They know they aren't tall, and don't have much vertical defense, so they back the paint with strong bodies and dare you to try to bully them. Teams that go into games wanting to dominate the Lakers in the paint, often find it's what the Lakers want. They've played some effective defense this way.
On the flip side, the Lakers really sell out to get this paint protection. They dare you to shoot threes, and hope for good shooting luck and/or unaggressive shooting. It's very similar to what the Mavs did to OKC in the playoffs last year, and OKC was a little too gun shy (they badly wanted to crack that paint defense). The Wolves have been a strong 3-point shooting team this year (top 5 in attempts and percentage). Ant, DDV, Naz, and Conley are all ready to hoist. Randle is a meh shooter, but he has no problem being an aggressive one, and if you leave him open, he'll happily take 8-10 threes and on the right night he'll hit 4-5. Unless the Wolves have some flat out atrocious shooting luck, they're going to force the Lakers out of their base scheme. DFS and Vando are happy to chase over screens, but Lebron and Luka very much want to stay in the paint. The Lakers are going to get forced into longer rotations than they want. Once their paint shell is broken, Rudy could become a problem on the offensive glass. He'll be a 7'1" man with a 7'8" wingspan playing in a series where the tallest opponent is 6'10" with a 7'3" wingspan. Rudy can only hurt you so much though, and the Lakers can stop him if they want. It will be hard though, to guard the 3-point line and protect the paint. The Wolves are aggressive shooting, but they're also aggressive driving. If they play well, they can stretch the Lakers defense out and rip it to shreds. The moment the Lakers decide they have to guard the perimeter more, Jaden and Randle will drive it down their throat.
Flipping again, the Lakers have a big advantage because Luka is completely bothered by length in pick & roll play. Any time Luka sees a guy like Gobert (or Zubac... any guy who is bigger than they are quick), his eyes light up. Luka completely smashed apart the Jaden/Gobert combo in pick & roll last year, generating lob dunks and corner threes at will. I haven't recovered from watching that. Finch, Gobert, Jaden... could not figure out an adjustment to stop it. This wasn't a "Gobert bad at playoff defense" kind of thing like fans say. Gobert was excellent in those coverages. Luka just... I dunno man, you just can't let him play undisrupted pick & roll like that. He's just really good against rim protection heavy teams, like no one I've ever seen.
I fear the Lakers. I fear Luka's pick & roll game, and Lebron's puzzle solving. I think there's a big BBIQ advantage the Lakers have where Luka and Lebron as so much smarter than Ant and Randle. I feel we're the more likely team to play bad or have a meltdown. However... I think the Wolves are the better team with more strategic advantages. Wolves are bigger, more athletic, faster, with more firepower. If there is some sort of Randle meltdown or cold shooting, I can see the Lakers humiliating us. If both teams show up and play their games, I think Wolves in 6.
MikRay wrote:shrink wrote:
Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5
shrink wrote:MikRay wrote:shrink wrote:
Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5
Yes, giving out the actual stats is clearly what homers do.
cupcakesnake wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:MikRay wrote:Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5
Post Objective stats
"What a homer!"
Ya media bias in the Wolves favor will be out of control this series

Jta444 wrote:Wtf is up with Gobert? How is he still in the league and how did he become multi DPOY? He a lanky awkward moving stick he got put in a blender by Luka last year feet all crossed up
And what happened to “we got Jaden McDaniels”? Absolutely no improvement this year despite Towns being shipped out and having more opportunities, he turned out to be a bum
Naz Reid is okay but he wastes his height and plays small, all he does is shoot the ball but inside he’s soft and can’t defend. So his size is nothing and isn’t felt on the court
Ant Edwards is okay, but got no killer instinct. He’s always smiling out there and not taking the game seriously
Randle is another softie who plays smaller than his size…

Bob8 wrote:I agree with majority of your comments, but I believe you still don't understand transformation Lakers had after the trade. The best example is 3s. Before ASB Lakers were shooting 34.5 3s, 25th in the league, with 35.6%. After all star break Lakers are shooting 40.4 3s, 7th most in the league, 38.6%, 5th best %. Difference is huge, Luka is just creating big volume of wide open 3s.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Bob8 wrote:shrink wrote:MikRay wrote:Homer! Lol this is why it’s a bad idea to have a beat writer (blind homer) from the state of Minnesota covering the team
LA in 5
Yes, giving out the actual stats is clearly what homers do.
Stats may be actual but difficult of schedule wasn't.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Bob8 wrote:cupcakesnake wrote:Watching the post-trade Lakers, I don't think it's going to be our size that messes them up. The Lakers play a ton of big wing and power forward sized dudes (Rui, Lebron, Luka, DFS, Vando) who are strong, and paint protection is their #1 goal. They know they aren't tall, and don't have much vertical defense, so they back the paint with strong bodies and dare you to try to bully them. Teams that go into games wanting to dominate the Lakers in the paint, often find it's what the Lakers want. They've played some effective defense this way.
On the flip side, the Lakers really sell out to get this paint protection. They dare you to shoot threes, and hope for good shooting luck and/or unaggressive shooting. It's very similar to what the Mavs did to OKC in the playoffs last year, and OKC was a little too gun shy (they badly wanted to crack that paint defense). The Wolves have been a strong 3-point shooting team this year (top 5 in attempts and percentage). Ant, DDV, Naz, and Conley are all ready to hoist. Randle is a meh shooter, but he has no problem being an aggressive one, and if you leave him open, he'll happily take 8-10 threes and on the right night he'll hit 4-5. Unless the Wolves have some flat out atrocious shooting luck, they're going to force the Lakers out of their base scheme. DFS and Vando are happy to chase over screens, but Lebron and Luka very much want to stay in the paint. The Lakers are going to get forced into longer rotations than they want. Once their paint shell is broken, Rudy could become a problem on the offensive glass. He'll be a 7'1" man with a 7'8" wingspan playing in a series where the tallest opponent is 6'10" with a 7'3" wingspan. Rudy can only hurt you so much though, and the Lakers can stop him if they want. It will be hard though, to guard the 3-point line and protect the paint. The Wolves are aggressive shooting, but they're also aggressive driving. If they play well, they can stretch the Lakers defense out and rip it to shreds. The moment the Lakers decide they have to guard the perimeter more, Jaden and Randle will drive it down their throat.
Flipping again, the Lakers have a big advantage because Luka is completely bothered by length in pick & roll play. Any time Luka sees a guy like Gobert (or Zubac... any guy who is bigger than they are quick), his eyes light up. Luka completely smashed apart the Jaden/Gobert combo in pick & roll last year, generating lob dunks and corner threes at will. I haven't recovered from watching that. Finch, Gobert, Jaden... could not figure out an adjustment to stop it. This wasn't a "Gobert bad at playoff defense" kind of thing like fans say. Gobert was excellent in those coverages. Luka just... I dunno man, you just can't let him play undisrupted pick & roll like that. He's just really good against rim protection heavy teams, like no one I've ever seen.
I fear the Lakers. I fear Luka's pick & roll game, and Lebron's puzzle solving. I think there's a big BBIQ advantage the Lakers have where Luka and Lebron as so much smarter than Ant and Randle. I feel we're the more likely team to play bad or have a meltdown. However... I think the Wolves are the better team with more strategic advantages. Wolves are bigger, more athletic, faster, with more firepower. If there is some sort of Randle meltdown or cold shooting, I can see the Lakers humiliating us. If both teams show up and play their games, I think Wolves in 6.
I agree with majority of your comments, but I believe you still don't understand transformation Lakers had after the trade. The best example is 3s. Before ASB Lakers were shooting 34.5 3s, 25th in the league, with 35.6%. After all star break Lakers are shooting 40.4 3s, 7th most in the league, 38.6%, 5th best %. Difference is huge, Luka is just creating big volume of wide open 3s.
The other point is, they will double Ant as much as possible, but they won't compromise the whole perimeter D for that, they will just leave open your worst shooter. Bet is really simple, limit Ant in shooting and drives and see, if your worst shooter can hit open shots, while doing that you know Ant will force a lot of shots, because it's no way his ego can survive scoring less than 15 points a game. JJ is doing some basketball psychological damage.