Post#163 » by audiosway » Wed Nov 26, 2025 8:07 am
You guys are hilarious with this stuff. Yes, Jokic is a great player and incredibly fun to watch. But, greatest offensive player ever? Why do they always have to be the best ever? First of all, you never watched Wilt did you? That man was 7 foot and could run a 4.5 second 40. He could rebound, shoot, pass, steal, block and whatever else you wanted. Oh and he had 100 points in an NBA game once too.
Then, there is Larry Legend. In 1985-86 Larry swept MJ, left Hakeem with a gentlemen's sweep, and took out the Houston Rockets twin towers while shooting 41% from 3, 54% from 2 and 93% from the free throw line. His total averages that playoffs was 25.9 points per game, 9.3 rebounds and 8.2 assists. Oh and he was also a 3 time All Defense on top of that. He invented the 50/40/90 club.
Wilt went up against guys like Bill Russell who was one of the most athletic and best defensive big men ever.
Larry Bird did all of that in the 80s Eastern Conference with Isaiah and the bad boy Pistons, Michael Jordan, Hakeem, and more not to mention Magic and Kareem in the West.
Yes we get to see some great players now. However, the defense today is nothing like it was in the 80s and 90s. When some of the posters mention stuff like this it isn't because we are saying the players from our era was better. We are saying that it's hard to say a guy is the best ever when players before him did super human things with a much tougher game. A Prime Tim Duncan would be hard for Jokic to work against. Let alone, Bill Laimbeer when you have a crowded paint, hand checking, and real playoff fouls. Playoff fouls from the 80s were generally what they would consider a flagrant 1 or 2 now.
There is a reason Luka said the NBA game is easier than the Euro game now. They don't have the 3 second rule and all of that. Luka was one of 5 players in Euro ball history to have a triple double this last summer. And the Euro game is nothing defensively compared to the 80s and 90s.
Some players from those previous decades wouldn't make it today. Just like some players today couldn't make it in previous decades. The game is just different. It's fast paced and offense friendly.
I do think that Jokic is a guy that could fit in any era. I just don't know if he would be as successful as he is now with the level of D that they played in previous eras. He doesn't do well with heavy contact. Smaller guys tend to get under him a little as well. A guy like Laimbeer would have gotten him pretty riled up. That can mess with your flow.
The Mavs are dead to me now.