Clyde Frazier wrote:
This is great!!!
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
bamheat wrote:Lebron gotta be pissed AD went down. Would have had ring # 5
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:hoosierdaddy34 wrote:DrWood wrote:Cleveland had 5.45 SRS in their championship season. The year before and the year after they had 4.08 and 2.87.
Bucks had 5.57 SRS this season, and 9.41 and 7.44 in the two previous years.
Phoenix had 5.67 SRS this season.
So you could say if the Bucks won, they not only were better than those Cleveland teams, they beat a better team than those Cleveland teams.
Pulling out obscure junk stats and leaning on them completely is not a solid argument.
srs is a junk stat compared to the standard of blatant fanboy homerism?
do the bucks need giannis to star in space jam 3 to be considered "good"?
~Regarding Denver Nuggets, May 2025hardenASG13 wrote:They are better than the teammates of SGA, Giannis, Luka, Brunson, Curry etc. so far.
levon wrote:this board: "THT's negative value"
this board after he's traded: "I like THT, and he's so young! stupid Lakers let another one go"
literally every Lakers young player in the last 7 years
hoosierdaddy34 wrote:GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:hoosierdaddy34 wrote:
Pulling out obscure junk stats and leaning on them completely is not a solid argument.
srs is a junk stat compared to the standard of blatant fanboy homerism?
do the bucks need giannis to star in space jam 3 to be considered "good"?
One doesn’t even have to mention LeBron, but these dudes will try to make everything all about him. They can’t help themselves.
There are good stats, there are bad stats. There is a time and a place and a way to use stats, and then there are people that don’t know **** and cite any stat they can find without comprehension to support their weird point. And try to pretend it makes them seem knowledgeable about the game of basketball.
Ambrose wrote:Anyone else start this series being fine with either team winning and now firmly favoring the Bucks? Booker and the Suns have really turned me off to them winning.
Yeggo Poleggo wrote:Jobs not finished.
Edug27 wrote:I see no way this Suns team can go into Milwaukee and force a game 7. That building will be electric.
TheBullsDynasty wrote:Did anyone catch Booker rubbing Giannis' arm/sleeve when he was heading towards the foul line with about 1 minute to go in the 4th Q? Score was 120-117 and it was right before Giannis missed both free throws if anyone wants to check it out. I'm not saying it was a bad thing (Giannis didn't even react to it) but it just seemed really weird.
TheBullsDynasty wrote:Did anyone catch Booker rubbing Giannis' arm/sleeve when he was heading towards the foul line with about 1 minute to go in the 4th Q? Score was 120-117 and it was right before Giannis missed both free throws if anyone wants to check it out. I'm not saying it was a bad thing (Giannis didn't even react to it) but it just seemed really weird.
DukeH wrote:Plenty, RealGM Bucks Board is the Golden Dawn of forums.
pj0tr wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:AussieBuck wrote:I agree that winning the next one is by far the easiest path but we did win game 7 away against the Nets with home cooking.
Maybe Jrue has just turned the corner? He's at 47TS% for the series, maybe he'll keep back on track towards normal?
I wouldn't be worried about a Game 7 in Phoenix is I'm a Bucks fan.
Giannis is by far the best player in the series and they have proven to be the mentally tougher team.
With Chris Paul breaking down physically its basically Booker or bust for their offense.
Suns role players usually play better at home. Cam Johnson probably had his worst game of the playoffs last night though.
Booker probably doesn't go for 40+ for a 3rd straight game, so Milwaukee likely wins comfortably, if not a blowout.