eyeatoma wrote:CharityStripe34 wrote:eyeatoma wrote:Jordan needed a better yeah to win MVP. They weren't handing MVPs to 6th seeds. Thanks for proving my point.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Milwaukee and Boston are first and second in the East.
Yup and Boston will drop further soon. Bucks will be top 2. Problem is Giannis is get less efficient this year. He's turned it around the last few games but they need another big 5 to 10 game win streak for him to get back to MVP contention. His defense is not what it was last year either.
Tatum is producing like last year now. Elite but not MVP level.
Even Embiid has leveled out the last 3 games but Sixers are still winning.Right now imo it's Embiid,Jokic, Tatum, Giannis, Luka. Luka has really fallen off too.
Sent from my SM-S908E using Tapatalk
Embiid has played in 13 philly wins
here's the thing: Harden and Maxey would be the best players after Jokic in his current Nuggets team (Harden would be the 2nd best by a landslide)
Even a guy like Melton is better then Brown\KCP etc.
Harris and AG are about a wash but if the roles were reveresed - AG would be completely marginalized by Embiid and AG is looking like an all-star for the sole reason on playing alongside Jokic
Despite the huge disparity in rosters, despite playing in more games (and more wins when Jokic plays), despite being considerably better than Embiid this season (and every season b4 it), despite having a better team record and seeding - u still have Embiid over Jokic? that's mindboggling

if they "weren't handing out MVP's to 6th seeds" it stands to reason that you put team record as critical prerequsite, no?
If i disregard the outliers (WB etc.), MVP has traditionally gone to the 1st and 2nd seed (for the most part)
can we agree that Embiid isn't even in the conversation until the Sixers have the 2nd best record?
I mean the best scorer ever AND the best Center AND DPOY can't get his team to the 2nd seed despite playing along time all-stars, ATG's and great role players?
that sounds weird - something doesn't add up

In 87/88, 24 yo Jordan had a god like season (that's the 35 ppg season) where he won MVP despite the Bulls finishing just 50-32 which was tied for 3rd/4th in the East and 7th/8th overall
all he was playing with was 22 year old Horace Grant and Pippen who weren't very good (yet), Oakley and Paxon
in fact Jordan had a BPM of about 13 with no other Bull even posting a positive mark
tell me more about how Jordan needed a "better team" to win MVP...
that's propestrous
Jokic btw is also at 12.1 BPM, he had 13.7 (!!) last season and had 12.1 in his first MVP season
last season he was the only Nugget to have a positive mark and this season only AG has about 2.2 BPM and anyone who watched the games, can tell it would have looked very different for him without Jokic as he is the main beneficiary of Jokic's tremendous and historic passing ability (and gravity)
p.s Embiid is at an impressive 8.7 Bpm (tho i'd imagine that number would be lower if he had to play all the games, back to back etc.)
that's impressive and he's certainly a great and very impactful player but..get real

he is aided btw (at least according to BPM which is obviously a very limited and flawed stat and blah blah all the possible caveats) by Harden with 4.2 (which is an basically an all-star mark), Harris with 2.0, Melton with 1.6 and Maxey with 0.6
that's 4 more positive players (including a star in Harden) than Jokic had last season and 3 more than he has this season (at least until MPJ can stay on the court) and like i said, Harris can be an All-star next to Jokic and AG would have been a scrub next to Embiid
my man, Embiid is shooting 52% from the field and his stacked team is 3rd in it's own division
give it a rest