NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued)

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

Who is leading the race for MVP? (players listed in alphabetical order)

Giannis Antetokounmpo
50
17%
Luka Doncic
45
15%
Kevin Durant
1
0%
Anthony Edwards
3
1%
Joel Embiid
61
21%
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
41
14%
Tyrese Haliburton
8
3%
Nikola Jokic
64
22%
Jayson Tatum
7
2%
Other (Kawhi, Curry, Booker, Fox, Gobert, LeBron, AD, Etc.)
11
4%
 
Total votes: 291

Special_Puppy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,033
And1: 2,691
Joined: Sep 23, 2023

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1681 » by Special_Puppy » Fri Jan 5, 2024 5:11 pm

What's the case for Luka over Jokic+Embiid+Giannis+SGA? His team is much worse than all of theirs (shouldn't matter but it does sadly). He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level.
User avatar
Jamaaliver
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 45,781
And1: 17,389
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
Contact:
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1682 » by Jamaaliver » Fri Jan 5, 2024 5:14 pm

Kurtz wrote:Interesting stat but pace of play dependent. The 3 guys at the top play on teams that score a ton and allow a ton.


That is the case for
every
single
counting stat
.

In every single sport.

For all time...
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 21,548
And1: 20,701
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1683 » by Wolfgang630 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 5:19 pm

Special_Puppy wrote:What's the case for Luka over Jokic+Embiid+Giannis+SGA? His team is much worse than all of theirs (shouldn't matter but it does sadly). He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level.

There is no case. The Mavs are the 7th seed.
Jaqua92
RealGM
Posts: 13,304
And1: 8,528
Joined: Feb 21, 2017
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1684 » by Jaqua92 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 6:09 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:
CobraCommander wrote:On a night when 1a and 1b both go off - the board pretty quiet
I mean Jokic had a stat line that Embiid usually has through 3 quarters and struggled to put way an under .500 team.

Giannis barely beat the pitiful Spurs.

Neither game should have been close.

BUT when Embiid dominates bad teams so badly that he sits the entire 4th quarter, it's "let me know when he plays somebody."

Am I doing this thing right?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Well said...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


When has Embiid had 34/9/10 on 13/16 shooting in 3 quarters?

There's nothing well said about that comment.
dygaction
General Manager
Posts: 7,638
And1: 4,926
Joined: Sep 20, 2015
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1685 » by dygaction » Fri Jan 5, 2024 6:10 pm

eyeatoma wrote:
AleksandarN wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
Wins aren't everything when it's marginal, it's not some astronomical numbers that Shai has over Embiid in the wins department. Embiid is more efficient, adding more blocks, points, and boards, and basically equal assists. What part of his statistical profile is worse? Steals, that's it...Even there, Embiid is averaging 1.2 spg.

Embiid currently is having one of the most statistically significant seasons in NBA history, yes better than SGA...

The most efficient season of all time, by a large margin

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Even Joker thinks he's amazing!

Read on Twitter


Bill Simmons thinks he's better than Shaq this year if only counting the regular season...

Read on Twitter


Now advance stats matter ok. After you **** talk stats the last 3 years

Image


Advanced stats are a component. (I never said they didn't matter, just said they were not the end all and be all, and the only thing that should be looked at). Not only does Embiid have the advanced stats, he has the raw stats too. He's also winning at an unprecedented rate when he plays.



Please stop flooding the board with those philly homer tweets. You can help digest some useful information as to us you are more trustworthy than them. Otherwise it will be garbage in garbage out.
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,512
And1: 7,063
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1686 » by XtremeDunkz » Fri Jan 5, 2024 7:28 pm

Jaqua92 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:I mean Jokic had a stat line that Embiid usually has through 3 quarters and struggled to put way an under .500 team.

Giannis barely beat the pitiful Spurs.

Neither game should have been close.

BUT when Embiid dominates bad teams so badly that he sits the entire 4th quarter, it's "let me know when he plays somebody."

Am I doing this thing right?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Well said...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


When has Embiid had 34/9/10 on 13/16 shooting in 3 quarters?

There's nothing well said about that comment.


Sorry Embiid had 31/15/10
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
Cubbies2120
Head Coach
Posts: 6,380
And1: 9,293
Joined: Apr 20, 2012
Location: MD
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1687 » by Cubbies2120 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 7:37 pm

XtremeDunkz wrote:
Jaqua92 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:Well said...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


When has Embiid had 34/9/10 on 13/16 shooting in 3 quarters?

There's nothing well said about that comment.


Sorry Embiid had 31/15/10


"Usually has through 3 quarters" - Y'all love using that 3 quarters phrase, because that suits the narrative (Embiid plays full 1st + 3rd quarter, which means by end of quarter 3 he has played more minutes than Jokic has by end of quarter 3 typically).

https://nbarotations.info/player/203999
https://nbarotations.info/player/203954

Luckily we are intelligent enough to look at context :)
"End of 3rd quarter" usually means 32 minutes played for Embiid
"End of 3rd quarter" usually means 30 minutes played for Jokic

Sounds a lot less impressive that way, eh?

I do love that Embiid is copying Jokic's playstyle now, turns out the Jokic prototype is changing the way the game is played. Embiid's triple doubles have skyrocketed since he saw the success Jokic has had.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery :)
Jokic 5x MVP train
XtremeDunkz
General Manager
Posts: 8,512
And1: 7,063
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1688 » by XtremeDunkz » Fri Jan 5, 2024 7:52 pm

Cubbies2120 wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:
Jaqua92 wrote:
When has Embiid had 34/9/10 on 13/16 shooting in 3 quarters?

There's nothing well said about that comment.


Sorry Embiid had 31/15/10


"Usually has through 3 quarters" - Y'all love using that 3 quarters phrase, because that suits the narrative (Embiid plays full 1st + 3rd quarter, which means by end of quarter 3 he has played more minutes than Jokic has by end of quarter 3 typically).

https://nbarotations.info/player/203999
https://nbarotations.info/player/203954

Luckily we are intelligent enough to look at context :)
"End of 3rd quarter" usually means 32 minutes played for Embiid
"End of 3rd quarter" usually means 30 minutes played for Jokic

Sounds a lot less impressive that way, eh?

I do love that Embiid is copying Jokic's playstyle now, turns out the Jokic prototype is changing the way the game is played. Embiid's triple doubles have skyrocketed since he saw the success Jokic has had.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery :)



You wrote all that to try and say an extra 2 minutes is why Embiid does what he does...2 minutes? God I remember why I don't visit this board often anymore lol. Jokic played 38 minutes to get those stats last night btw
10/27/16
Nemesis21 wrote:It is absolutely hilarious hearing people still say Embiid has superstar potential.The guy is one injury away from being Greg Oden.:lol: Except Oden manged to play over 100 games in the NBA, I don't think Embiid will play more.
User avatar
Baz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,844
And1: 2,695
Joined: Mar 18, 2015

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1689 » by Baz » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:03 pm

Special_Puppy wrote:What's the case for Luka over Jokic+Embiid+Giannis+SGA? His team is much worse than all of theirs (shouldn't matter but it does sadly). He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level.


"His team is much worse than all of theirs"
Yeah, exactly. That's the case. They can't win without him.

And still, they're 20-12 with him. 0-3 without. In a tough Western Conference. He has to play 40 minutes a night.

"He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level" Only Luka and one other player in NBA history have scored 50 points and 15 assists in a game. Which he did the other night. Luka Doncic averaged 37.5 points, 11.1 assists and 8.9 rebounds in 13 games last month. 8 wins and 5 losses. Other than Embiid, nobody was putting up crazy numbers close to that last month. While constantly being doubled and hit, and barely getting to the line. And yet, he's falling in the ladder. Being 5th in the race and out of the conversation is telling. The league doesn't want him to be on the Mavs. The writing is on the wall. He has to go somewhere else if he wants to win anything, even at an individual level. They don't even put him on national TV much anymore. If the Most Valuable Player award was true to his name, he'd be it. The Mavs are 7th in the West. OKC were 6th in the West when Westbrook won the MVP. But because he's 7th, he's out of the conversation. That's a violation, I guess.

For the record, I got Luka moving between 2 and 3 with Jokic behind Embiid, although the Sixers don't look too uncomfortable without him which could hurt his case, & the Nuggets won their only game without Jokic so far this season. Clearly none of these teams win a championship without their MVP level guys, but I do think Luka has the biggest impact and is the biggest loss for his team when he's out.
AleksandarN
General Manager
Posts: 9,353
And1: 12,872
Joined: Aug 08, 2002

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1690 » by AleksandarN » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:05 pm

XtremeDunkz wrote:
Cubbies2120 wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:
Sorry Embiid had 31/15/10


"Usually has through 3 quarters" - Y'all love using that 3 quarters phrase, because that suits the narrative (Embiid plays full 1st + 3rd quarter, which means by end of quarter 3 he has played more minutes than Jokic has by end of quarter 3 typically).

https://nbarotations.info/player/203999
https://nbarotations.info/player/203954

Luckily we are intelligent enough to look at context :)
"End of 3rd quarter" usually means 32 minutes played for Embiid
"End of 3rd quarter" usually means 30 minutes played for Jokic

Sounds a lot less impressive that way, eh?

I do love that Embiid is copying Jokic's playstyle now, turns out the Jokic prototype is changing the way the game is played. Embiid's triple doubles have skyrocketed since he saw the success Jokic has had.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery :)



You wrote all that to try and say an extra 2 minutes is why Embiid does what he does...2 minutes? God I remember why I don't visit this board often anymore lol. Jokic played 38 minutes to get those stats last night btw

Funny you make it sound like Embiid gets so many triple doubles in 3 quarters of play. How many triple doubles does Embiid have again this year? Or better yet how many does he have for his career?
User avatar
yannisk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,988
And1: 3,935
Joined: Jul 14, 2013

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1691 » by yannisk » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:30 pm

For the last 3 years the mvp thread is 2-3 guys making a case for Embiid full time. I mean we are all fans but this is becoming an obsession
scrabbarista
RealGM
Posts: 20,349
And1: 18,079
Joined: May 31, 2015

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1692 » by scrabbarista » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:31 pm

yannisk wrote:For the last 3 years the mvp thread is 2-3 guys making a case for Embiid full time. I mean we are all fans but this is becoming an obsession


Becoming?
All human life on the earth is like grass, and all human glory is like a flower in a field. The grass dries up and its flower falls off, but the Lord’s word endures forever.
dygaction
General Manager
Posts: 7,638
And1: 4,926
Joined: Sep 20, 2015
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1693 » by dygaction » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:32 pm

Baz wrote:
Special_Puppy wrote:What's the case for Luka over Jokic+Embiid+Giannis+SGA? His team is much worse than all of theirs (shouldn't matter but it does sadly). He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level.


"His team is much worse than all of theirs"
Yeah, exactly. That's the case. They can't win without him.

And still, they're 20-12 with him. 0-3 without. In a tough Western Conference. He has to play 40 minutes a night.

"He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level" Only Luka and one other player in NBA history have scored 50 points and 15 assists in a game. Which he did the other night. Luka Doncic averaged 37.5 points, 11.1 assists and 8.9 rebounds in 13 games last month. 8 wins and 5 losses. Other than Embiid, nobody was putting up crazy numbers close to that last month. While constantly being doubled and hit, and barely getting to the line. And yet, he's falling in the ladder. Being 5th in the race and out of the conversation is telling. The league doesn't want him to be on the Mavs. The writing is on the wall. He has to go somewhere else if he wants to win anything, even at an individual level. They don't even put him on national TV much anymore. If the Most Valuable Player award was true to his name, he'd be it. The Mavs are 7th in the West. OKC were 6th in the West when Westbrook won the MVP. But because he's 7th, he's out of the conversation. That's a violation, I guess.

For the record, I got Luka moving between 2 and 3 with Jokic behind Embiid, although the Sixers don't look too uncomfortable without him which could hurt his case, & the Nuggets won their only game without Jokic so far this season. Clearly none of these teams win a championship without their MVP level guys, but I do think Luka has the biggest impact and is the biggest loss for his team when he's out.



I am all for Luka but this is different from Westbrook year. That year Westbrook was #1 in scoring, 31.6ppg vs. 2nd place Harden @29.1, together with triple double season. #1 in BPM 30.6 (2nd Kawhi 27.6), PER, and VORP. Played in 81 games and even peaked his 3pt shooting @.343%. Him playing like that this year would not be enough. The top talents this year are performing too much better than 2017 on great teams.
QPR
Analyst
Posts: 3,184
And1: 4,359
Joined: Mar 02, 2011

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1694 » by QPR » Fri Jan 5, 2024 8:59 pm

There was also the narrative of OKC losing KD that helped Westbrook's case. He was basically a one man show in getting them into the playoffs.
User avatar
CharityStripe34
General Manager
Posts: 9,669
And1: 6,501
Joined: Dec 01, 2014
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1695 » by CharityStripe34 » Fri Jan 5, 2024 9:53 pm

yannisk wrote:For the last 3 years the mvp thread is 2-3 guys making a case for Embiid full time. I mean we are all fans but this is becoming an obsession


It's like a 4-year conversation all at the same coffee table. Who's making the next pot? Entertaining as hell nonetheless.
"Wes, Hill, Ibaka, Allen, Nwora, Brook, Pat, Ingles, Khris are all slow-mo, injury prone ... a sandcastle waiting for playoff wave to get wrecked. A castle with no long-range archers... is destined to fall. That is all I have to say."-- FOTIS
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,944
And1: 13,202
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1696 » by eyeatoma » Fri Jan 5, 2024 10:15 pm

Jaqua92 wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
XtremeDunkz wrote:I mean Jokic had a stat line that Embiid usually has through 3 quarters and struggled to put way an under .500 team.

Giannis barely beat the pitiful Spurs.

Neither game should have been close.

BUT when Embiid dominates bad teams so badly that he sits the entire 4th quarter, it's "let me know when he plays somebody."

Am I doing this thing right?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
Well said...

Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk


When has Embiid had 34/9/10 on 13/16 shooting in 3 quarters?

There's nothing well said about that comment.
Lol he dropped a triple double his last game in three quarters. 31/15/10...



Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk
eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,944
And1: 13,202
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1697 » by eyeatoma » Fri Jan 5, 2024 10:28 pm

dygaction wrote:
eyeatoma wrote:
AleksandarN wrote:
Now advance stats matter ok. After you **** talk stats the last 3 years

Image


Advanced stats are a component. (I never said they didn't matter, just said they were not the end all and be all, and the only thing that should be looked at). Not only does Embiid have the advanced stats, he has the raw stats too. He's also winning at an unprecedented rate when he plays.



Please stop flooding the board with those philly homer tweets. You can help digest some useful information as to us you are more trustworthy than them. Otherwise it will be garbage in garbage out.



Come on bro, just because it comes from a Philly source doesn't mean there is bias in there.

Also, last two sources are Jokic and BIll Simmons...
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,395
And1: 16,516
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1698 » by CobraCommander » Fri Jan 5, 2024 10:38 pm

scrabbarista wrote:
yannisk wrote:For the last 3 years the mvp thread is 2-3 guys making a case for Embiid full time. I mean we are all fans but this is becoming an obsession


Becoming?


It’s being studied by Harvard medical and may be classified as a “condition” by years end…
CobraCommander
RealGM
Posts: 25,395
And1: 16,516
Joined: May 01, 2014
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1699 » by CobraCommander » Fri Jan 5, 2024 10:45 pm

dygaction wrote:
Baz wrote:
Special_Puppy wrote:What's the case for Luka over Jokic+Embiid+Giannis+SGA? His team is much worse than all of theirs (shouldn't matter but it does sadly). He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level.


"His team is much worse than all of theirs"
Yeah, exactly. That's the case. They can't win without him.

And still, they're 20-12 with him. 0-3 without. In a tough Western Conference. He has to play 40 minutes a night.

"He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level" Only Luka and one other player in NBA history have scored 50 points and 15 assists in a game. Which he did the other night. Luka Doncic averaged 37.5 points, 11.1 assists and 8.9 rebounds in 13 games last month. 8 wins and 5 losses. Other than Embiid, nobody was putting up crazy numbers close to that last month. While constantly being doubled and hit, and barely getting to the line. And yet, he's falling in the ladder. Being 5th in the race and out of the conversation is telling. The league doesn't want him to be on the Mavs. The writing is on the wall. He has to go somewhere else if he wants to win anything, even at an individual level. They don't even put him on national TV much anymore. If the Most Valuable Player award was true to his name, he'd be it. The Mavs are 7th in the West. OKC were 6th in the West when Westbrook won the MVP. But because he's 7th, he's out of the conversation. That's a violation, I guess.

For the record, I got Luka moving between 2 and 3 with Jokic behind Embiid, although the Sixers don't look too uncomfortable without him which could hurt his case, & the Nuggets won their only game without Jokic so far this season. Clearly none of these teams win a championship without their MVP level guys, but I do think Luka has the biggest impact and is the biggest loss for his team when he's out.



I am all for Luka but this is different from Westbrook year. That year Westbrook was #1 in scoring, 31.6ppg vs. 2nd place Harden @29.1, together with triple double season. #1 in BPM 30.6 (2nd Kawhi 27.6), PER, and VORP. Played in 81 games and even peaked his 3pt shooting @.343%. Him playing like that this year would not be enough. The top talents this year are performing too much better than 2017 on great teams.

Everyone loves Luka - he may get an MVP soon. But this year isn’t that year -

jokic and Embiid are clearly playing better on better teams.

Giannis has had a better big historic game- and is playing at least as well.

SGA and Luka fighting for 4th right now with both of them having a strong case for an MVP any year but this damn year.


Jokic just played the role of a guard and took the ball from 50’ on the inbounds and drove to 30 and buried a 3 to win a game on the road against the GSW to complete a double digit comeback. And that was the play they drew up ?! The center to play guard at 50 feet out with 3 seconds to go.

That’s F***king insane-

I can’t think of another center in the history of earth that could or even would be asked to do that -

Not one…

That’s the shot dame, Curry, MJ, Kobe takes -

While Lebron looks for the right play/pass or shot -

And any other big man isn’t even in the action -
dygaction
General Manager
Posts: 7,638
And1: 4,926
Joined: Sep 20, 2015
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion Thread 2023-24 (continued) 

Post#1700 » by dygaction » Fri Jan 5, 2024 11:14 pm

CobraCommander wrote:
dygaction wrote:
Baz wrote:
"His team is much worse than all of theirs"
Yeah, exactly. That's the case. They can't win without him.

And still, they're 20-12 with him. 0-3 without. In a tough Western Conference. He has to play 40 minutes a night.

"He isn't really outplaying them on an individual level" Only Luka and one other player in NBA history have scored 50 points and 15 assists in a game. Which he did the other night. Luka Doncic averaged 37.5 points, 11.1 assists and 8.9 rebounds in 13 games last month. 8 wins and 5 losses. Other than Embiid, nobody was putting up crazy numbers close to that last month. While constantly being doubled and hit, and barely getting to the line. And yet, he's falling in the ladder. Being 5th in the race and out of the conversation is telling. The league doesn't want him to be on the Mavs. The writing is on the wall. He has to go somewhere else if he wants to win anything, even at an individual level. They don't even put him on national TV much anymore. If the Most Valuable Player award was true to his name, he'd be it. The Mavs are 7th in the West. OKC were 6th in the West when Westbrook won the MVP. But because he's 7th, he's out of the conversation. That's a violation, I guess.

For the record, I got Luka moving between 2 and 3 with Jokic behind Embiid, although the Sixers don't look too uncomfortable without him which could hurt his case, & the Nuggets won their only game without Jokic so far this season. Clearly none of these teams win a championship without their MVP level guys, but I do think Luka has the biggest impact and is the biggest loss for his team when he's out.



I am all for Luka but this is different from Westbrook year. That year Westbrook was #1 in scoring, 31.6ppg vs. 2nd place Harden @29.1, together with triple double season. #1 in BPM 30.6 (2nd Kawhi 27.6), PER, and VORP. Played in 81 games and even peaked his 3pt shooting @.343%. Him playing like that this year would not be enough. The top talents this year are performing too much better than 2017 on great teams.

Everyone loves Luka - he may get an MVP soon. But this year isn’t that year -

jokic and Embiid are clearly playing better on better teams.

Giannis has had a better big historic game- and is playing at least as well.

SGA and Luka fighting for 4th right now with both of them having a strong case for an MVP any year but this damn year.


Jokic just played the role of a guard and took the ball from 50’ on the inbounds and drove to 30 and buried a 3 to win a game on the road against the GSW to complete a double digit comeback. And that was the play they drew up ?! The center to play guard at 50 feet out with 3 seconds to go.

That’s F***king insane-

I can’t think of another center in the history of earth that could or even would be asked to do that -

Not one…

That’s the shot dame, Curry, MJ, Kobe takes -

While Lebron looks for the right play/pass or shot -

And any other big man isn’t even in the action -


Nah, I don't see how SGA is not top 2 if you are not biased on previous seasons or history. He is having the same efficiency .643TS% with Embiid .650TS% and Giannis .650 as a guard, played in all their 23 wins, top 3 in all PER/WS/48/BPM/VORP.
If you are claiming Jokic and Embiid are playing better on better teams, they should have better record, but they don't. That tells you at least one "better" does not stand.

Return to The General Board