NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 (Fresh poll ➥ Vote)

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Who is the MVP so far?

Poll ended at Sun Apr 18, 2021 10:39 am

Damian Lillard
13
5%
Luka Doncic
8
3%
Nikola Jokic
76
32%
Joel Embiid
14
6%
Kawhi Leonard
1
0%
Steph Curry
3
1%
Giannis Antetokounmpo
51
21%
James Harden
20
8%
LeBron James
51
21%
Other - Who?
1
0%
 
Total votes: 238

eyeatoma
RealGM
Posts: 29,958
And1: 13,210
Joined: Feb 25, 2005
     

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1741 » by eyeatoma » Sat Mar 6, 2021 12:16 am

theonlyclutch wrote:
NADALalot wrote:
theonlyclutch wrote:The effort by Denver fans to downplay Embiid's offense is pretty hilarious, PHI has a 119.6 ORTG with Embiid on-court which is elite and fairly close to DEN's 121.3 ORTG with Jokic on-court. This is despite PHI having less shooters and therefore significantly less proficient and prolific at taking threes (having Simmons at PG does that for you). The idea that somehow Embiid isn't also an A+ offensive centerpiece playing the way he is right now is ridiculous.

What would happen to Philly's offense if they didn't have Simmons?


Better than Denver's offense w/o Murray, apparently

Jokic with Murray: 124.3 ORTG

w/o Murray: 112.2 ORTG

Embiid w/ Simmons: 120.2 ORTG

w/o Simmoms: 113.9 ORTG


Statlanta wrote:I don’t think Embiid is an A tier offensive player. More like B tier. His slightly above average foul draw is going against the GOAT playmaker at his position. Even then it’s possible that ability, reliant on refs mind you, won’t scale to the playoffs as opposed to Jokic’s natural pass first tendency. In addition he’s a worse FT shooter than Jokic so how much PPP are we really gaining there.

The offensive gap is greater than the defensive gap(which by the way is really only mobility in space), it’s clear as day when you watch both players individual scoring touch on the basketball.


Embiid's literally drawing more free throws than peak Shaquille O'Neal on a minutes-adjusted basis, and that aspect of his game has historically transferred just fine in the playoffs. Being a massive factor in getting opposing bigs into foul trouble also seems like a pretty good way to open up the offense by forcing those bigs to play more conservatively on D. It's not aesthetically pleasing like Jokic's game but the on-court results speak for themselves.



Great article from Insider from Zach Lowe, about how Embiid has gotten that much better this season. At the moment Lowe has him as MVP by a hair. Can't post the videos unfortunately.

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31003706/ten-nba-things-like-including-peak-joel-embiid

1. Joel Embiid and the little things
The most important story for the Philadelphia 76ers this season has been the massive improvement in Joel Embiid's midrange shot, and the variety of ways he gets to it.


Embiid has hit 53% on long 2s. He is more comfortable facing up from the top of the key, where it's harder for defenses to double. That gives Philadelphia another crunch-time answer, and it's the main weapon fueling Embiid's case to be the first big-man MVP since Dirk Nowitzki in 2006-07 -- and the first true center to win it in two decades.

But Embiid also seems more dialed in on the little things.


He clogs this drive, before Philly concedes an open triple to Embiid's man -- Domantas Sabonis. Most centers would park under the rim, boxing out air, assuming the rebound will fall to them. Instead, Embiid finds someone -- Myles Turner -- to take out.

Embiid is more diligent using one of his most obvious physical gifts: the length of his arms.


Good luck to any team involving the Ben Simmons-Embiid duo in a pick-and-roll. All you see are mean faces and long limbs.

(It should be noted this isn't quite showing up in public stats. Embiid's deflections haven't budged. His boxouts are down, though boxouts have dropped so severely league-wide -- according to the NBA's official page -- I'm wary of them. Embiid is about as active on the glass as last season, per Second Spectrum tracking data, and the Sixers allow fewer offensive rebounds when he's on the floor.)

I've seen less lead-footed standing -- including on offense, where Embiid is more active searching out instant pass-and-screen reads:


That is Draymond Green-ish: Sag too far off Embiid, and he might dart into a pick that catapults one Philly shooter into open space.

Have Embiid and Nikola Jokic put some distance between themselves and LeBron James (and the rest of the field) in the MVP race during the Los Angeles Lakers' recent cold stretch without Anthony Davis? Depends on the voter. LeBron has sustained his usual excellence; the Lakers are plus-20 with LeBron on the floor over nine consecutive games without Davis (and partly without Dennis Schroder), and minus-31 when he rests.

Embiid has been dynamite in crunch time for one of the league's best clutch teams. The small hole in his case: 98 assists and 96 turnovers. He is not as steady an all-court presence on offense as Jokic and James. In back-to-back games against the Toronto Raptors last month, Toronto swarmed Embiid before he even caught the ball. He shot 9-of-33 combined, and couldn't reclaim control of those games the way Jokic and LeBron might have.

But Toronto has a rare collection of long, fast, and ferocious defenders. The Sixers split those games, and Embiid managed 43 combined points largely thanks to his residency at the foul line. His defense was unaffected.

Is he the MVP? He probably leads by a hair today. A lot will change between now and voting time. Regardless: This is the Embiid we have waited to see.

Side note: James Harden's name has entered the MVP discourse. We have to see what life looks like when Kevin Durant returns, but no player has ever won the MVP during a season in which he was traded.
bebopdeluxe
RealGM
Posts: 10,996
And1: 4,009
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
Location: philly

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1742 » by bebopdeluxe » Sat Mar 6, 2021 2:03 am

Statlanta wrote:I don’t think Embiid is an A tier offensive player. More like B tier. His slightly above average foul draw is going against the GOAT playmaker at his position. Even then it’s possible that ability, reliant on refs mind you, won’t scale to the playoffs as opposed to Jokic’s natural pass first tendency. In addition he’s a worse FT shooter than Jokic so how much PPP are we really gaining there.

The offensive gap is greater than the defensive gap(which by the way is really only mobility in space), it’s clear as day when you watch both players individual scoring touch on the basketball.


This is probably one of the worst takes I have ever seen on the GB.

(that is saying a LOT)
User avatar
ocelot17
Veteran
Posts: 2,601
And1: 4,060
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Location: Houston, Tx
   

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1743 » by ocelot17 » Sat Mar 6, 2021 3:43 am

Read on Twitter
?s=21
Veselyfan
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 107
Joined: Jan 01, 2012

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1744 » by Veselyfan » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:15 am

I wrote the same thing in another thread. I am shocked that people and "analysts" are behaving as Embiid has a lock on the MVP award.

I mean Jokic has currently the highest PER in nba history, is better than Embiid in all advanced stats and is also almost averaging a 27 PPG triple-double. Oh yeah, I forgot about the Nuggets not winning games narrative. The Nuggets would be 4th in the East, and they are currently only 3 games behind the 76ers with half the season yet to be played.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,394
And1: 67,145
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1745 » by Dupp » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:34 am

ocelot17 wrote:
Read on Twitter
?s=21



That’s actually crazy
NADALalot
Senior
Posts: 524
And1: 354
Joined: Jan 26, 2021

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1746 » by NADALalot » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:37 am

Veselyfan wrote:I wrote the same thing in another thread. I am shocked that people and "analysts" are behaving as Embiid has a lock on the MVP award.

I mean Jokic has currently the highest PER in nba history, is better than Embiid in all advanced stats and is also almost averaging a 27 PPG triple-double. Oh yeah, I forgot about the Nuggets not winning games narrative. The Nuggets would be 4th in the East, and they are currently only 3 games behind the 76ers with half the season yet to be played.

But how can you be better than Embiid when you aren't even a 2-way player? No amount of PER can change that.
Embiid is elite at both ends, while Jokic is clearly not.
Its like Westbrook averaging a triple-double.....he's not a 2-way player, so he's not considered the best in the NBA.
Veselyfan
Sophomore
Posts: 203
And1: 107
Joined: Jan 01, 2012

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1747 » by Veselyfan » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:44 am

NADALalot wrote:
Veselyfan wrote:I wrote the same thing in another thread. I am shocked that people and "analysts" are behaving as Embiid has a lock on the MVP award.

I mean Jokic has currently the highest PER in nba history, is better than Embiid in all advanced stats and is also almost averaging a 27 PPG triple-double. Oh yeah, I forgot about the Nuggets not winning games narrative. The Nuggets would be 4th in the East, and they are currently only 3 games behind the 76ers with half the season yet to be played.

But how can you be better than Embiid when you aren't even a 2-way player? No amount of PER can change that.
Embiid is elite at both ends, while Jokic is clearly not.
Its like Westbrook averaging a triple-double.....he's not a 2-way player, so he's not considered the best in the NBA.

I didnt say Embiid doesnt deserve the MVP, I am just saying the race is not over related to the media narrative.

Embiid is a clearly better defender, but Jokic for example was in TOP 5 in steals per game almost the whole season, he improved a lot.

You cant compare Westbrook to Jokic in terms of the way of achieving triple doubles. One is stat padding, the other one is playing the right way. Jokic has 20+ games where he missed the triple double for 1 rebound or 1 assist.
NADALalot
Senior
Posts: 524
And1: 354
Joined: Jan 26, 2021

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1748 » by NADALalot » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:48 am

Veselyfan wrote:
NADALalot wrote:
Veselyfan wrote:I wrote the same thing in another thread. I am shocked that people and "analysts" are behaving as Embiid has a lock on the MVP award.

I mean Jokic has currently the highest PER in nba history, is better than Embiid in all advanced stats and is also almost averaging a 27 PPG triple-double. Oh yeah, I forgot about the Nuggets not winning games narrative. The Nuggets would be 4th in the East, and they are currently only 3 games behind the 76ers with half the season yet to be played.

But how can you be better than Embiid when you aren't even a 2-way player? No amount of PER can change that.
Embiid is elite at both ends, while Jokic is clearly not.
Its like Westbrook averaging a triple-double.....he's not a 2-way player, so he's not considered the best in the NBA.

I didnt say Embiid doesnt deserve the MVP, I am just saying the race is not over related to the media narrative.

Embiid is a clearly better defender, but Jokic for example was in TOP 5 in steals per game almost the whole season, he improved a lot.

You cant compare Westbrook to Jokic in terms of the way of achieving triple doubles. One is stat padding, the other one is playing the right way. Jokic has 20+ games where he missed the triple double for 1 rebound or 1 assist.

I know, I didn't mention MVP, I'm just talking about who the better player is.

If Jokic is better than Embiid at the offensive end (because of passing), its not a huge margin.
Whereas there is a huge margin between Embiid and Jokic at the defensive end.
Steals don't change that either, otherwise Iverson would have been considered a great defender....

I'm not comparing Westbrook to Jokic, I'm saying neither of them are 2-way players, so neither of them are the best player in the NBA.....whereas Embiid is the best player in the NBA right now.
Some will disagree with that, because some felt Curry was the best player in the NBA (despite not being a great defender), but I never did.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,394
And1: 67,145
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1749 » by Dupp » Sat Mar 6, 2021 9:55 am

NADALalot wrote:
Veselyfan wrote:
NADALalot wrote:But how can you be better than Embiid when you aren't even a 2-way player? No amount of PER can change that.
Embiid is elite at both ends, while Jokic is clearly not.
Its like Westbrook averaging a triple-double.....he's not a 2-way player, so he's not considered the best in the NBA.

I didnt say Embiid doesnt deserve the MVP, I am just saying the race is not over related to the media narrative.

Embiid is a clearly better defender, but Jokic for example was in TOP 5 in steals per game almost the whole season, he improved a lot.

You cant compare Westbrook to Jokic in terms of the way of achieving triple doubles. One is stat padding, the other one is playing the right way. Jokic has 20+ games where he missed the triple double for 1 rebound or 1 assist.

I know, I didn't mention MVP, I'm just talking about who the better player is.
If Jokic is better than Embiid at the offensive end (because of passing), its not a huge margin.
Whereas there is a huge margin between Embiid and Jokic at the defensive end.
Steals don't change that either, otherwise Iverson would have been considered a great defender....
I'm not comparing Westbrook to Jokic, I'm saying neither of them are 2-way players, so neither of them are the best player in the NBA.....whereas Embiid is the best player in the NBA right now.




There is actually a huge gap offensively between joker and Joel. Especially if you look past this one season. Embiid has been ass offensively in the playoffs while joker has been dominant.

But whatever way you slice it, regular season, playoffs, peak seaso, joker is a lot better offensively.
BelgradeNugget
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,904
And1: 3,914
Joined: Jun 16, 2018
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1750 » by BelgradeNugget » Sat Mar 6, 2021 10:46 am

NADALalot wrote:
Veselyfan wrote:
NADALalot wrote:But how can you be better than Embiid when you aren't even a 2-way player? No amount of PER can change that.
Embiid is elite at both ends, while Jokic is clearly not.
Its like Westbrook averaging a triple-double.....he's not a 2-way player, so he's not considered the best in the NBA.

I didnt say Embiid doesnt deserve the MVP, I am just saying the race is not over related to the media narrative.

Embiid is a clearly better defender, but Jokic for example was in TOP 5 in steals per game almost the whole season, he improved a lot.

You cant compare Westbrook to Jokic in terms of the way of achieving triple doubles. One is stat padding, the other one is playing the right way. Jokic has 20+ games where he missed the triple double for 1 rebound or 1 assist.

I know, I didn't mention MVP, I'm just talking about who the better player is.

If Jokic is better than Embiid at the offensive end (because of passing), its not a huge margin.
Whereas there is a huge margin between Embiid and Jokic at the defensive end.
Steals don't change that either, otherwise Iverson would have been considered a great defender....

I'm not comparing Westbrook to Jokic, I'm saying neither of them are 2-way players, so neither of them are the best player in the NBA.....whereas Embiid is the best player in the NBA right now.
Some will disagree with that, because some felt Curry was the best player in the NBA (despite not being a great defender), but I never did.


Steve Nesh MVP season
18.8/4.2/10.5 on 51.2/43.9/92.1

Norman Powell this season
18.4/3.0/1.7 on 48.8/43.8/89.9

The difference is only in play-making. Is it Big? That is exactly the difference in play-making between Jokic and Embiid.

BTW for all people asking about Jokic's defense just watch Nuggets-Pacers game from yesterday. He was guarding all-star Sabonis.
Few facts:

1. Jokic is among the best in the league in steals and deflections. Iverson was gambling for steals, if he doesn't steal a ball he is out of defense. Jokic is never gambling. Same can be said about blocks, Whitesade/Noel are great blockers, bad defenders because they are chasing stats
2. Jokic is always boxing out, preventing opposing team from getting OREB's
3. Jokic is great post defender (ask Sabas)
4. Always at the right place defensively
5. Allows 0.3 fgm more then Embiid under the rim
https://www.nba.com/stats/players/opponent-shooting/?sort=Less%20Than%205%20ft.%20FGM&dir=1&Season=2020-21&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&PlayerPosition=C
6. Bad shot blocker, bad against lobs. Needs help against p'n'r

Overall very good defender
chaimer
Freshman
Posts: 54
And1: 36
Joined: Sep 22, 2020

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1751 » by chaimer » Sat Mar 6, 2021 11:47 am

IMO this is the very peak of Harden's MVP case hype. Once Durant is back, Harden will get less and less credit for Nets success, even if they finish with the best record in the East or entire NBA. Agree?
Openheimer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,970
And1: 1,100
Joined: Dec 01, 2020

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1752 » by Openheimer » Sat Mar 6, 2021 3:02 pm

chaimer wrote:IMO this is the very peak of Harden's MVP case hype. Once Durant is back, Harden will get less and less credit for Nets success, even if they finish with the best record in the East or entire NBA. Agree?

No because even a blind man can see harden is the engine and possibly the best player even when Durant was there and his absence has made it crystal clear who the main man now on offense is. The Durant absence just reaffirmed how great harden is at carrying teams.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,394
And1: 67,145
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1753 » by Dupp » Sat Mar 6, 2021 5:40 pm

Openheimer wrote:
chaimer wrote:IMO this is the very peak of Harden's MVP case hype. Once Durant is back, Harden will get less and less credit for Nets success, even if they finish with the best record in the East or entire NBA. Agree?

No because even a blind man can see harden is the engine and possibly the best player even when Durant was there and his absence has made it crystal clear who the main man now on offense is. The Durant absence just reaffirmed how great harden is at carrying teams.



He may be right. It’s gonna be very tricky for harden to get the respect he deserves in this race. The early season narrative might even be unshakable for the voters this year.
Openheimer
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,970
And1: 1,100
Joined: Dec 01, 2020

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1754 » by Openheimer » Sat Mar 6, 2021 5:48 pm

Dupp wrote:
Openheimer wrote:
chaimer wrote:IMO this is the very peak of Harden's MVP case hype. Once Durant is back, Harden will get less and less credit for Nets success, even if they finish with the best record in the East or entire NBA. Agree?

No because even a blind man can see harden is the engine and possibly the best player even when Durant was there and his absence has made it crystal clear who the main man now on offense is. The Durant absence just reaffirmed how great harden is at carrying teams.



He may be right. It’s gonna be very tricky for harden to get the respect he deserves in this race. The early season narrative might even be unshakable for the voters this year.


Harden has proven now that he can carry the Nets at an elite level without KD so that won’t be an issue. Plus harden and KD played like what 8 or 9 games together out of hardens 23 game net career and they are 17-6 .
User avatar
Genjuro
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,839
And1: 227
Joined: May 06, 2002
Location: Spain

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1755 » by Genjuro » Sat Mar 6, 2021 7:54 pm

scrabbarista wrote:
Genjuro wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:
An MVP formula I made. It uses WS, VORP, OnCourt, On-Off, and team wins.

It matches 10 of the last 12 winners. It has Curry over Westbrook (2nd) in 2017 and James over Rose (7th) in 2011. I have results back to '96-'97, which is the first year for which we have OnCourt and On-Off.


Could you post the rest of the winners according to your formula going back to the 96-97 season?


It doesn't match as well before the last twelve years. I think that's because voters used to be way more narrative-driven, and they've become more based in actual fact as "advanced" stats have filtered into the mainstream.

Here is '97 through '08:

Malone, Malone, Malone, O'Neal, O'Neal, Duncan, Garnett, Garnett, Nowitzki, James, Nowitzki, Paul ----

The closest race is 1997, when Malone had a 27.16 and Jordan was a 26.94.

2020 (Antetokounmpo/Harden), 2019 (Antetokounmpo/Harden), 2015 (Curry, Paul), 2006 (James/Nowitzki), and 2003 (Garnett/Nowitzki) were also decided by less than 1.00 points. Plus, 2001 had O'Neal defeating Nowitzki by just 1.02 points.

Notice how much Nowitzki shows up. I think he's one of the most underrated players in NBA history. Maybe it's because he's a quiet, big, white German. I don't know. Jokic seems to be getting similarly overlooked this season.

Overall, the formula matches the winners in 1997, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2018, 2019, and 2020.

The only two players to score over 30.0 are 2009 LeBron James (33.35) and 2016 Stephen Curry (31.08).

I've never used MVP Awards in my all-time lists. The combination of it being based purely on the subjective opinions of writers with the fact that it's a "winner takes all" scenario just makes it too unreliable, imho. I have used Top 5 MVP finishes in the past, and the most recent iteration of my all-time list used Top 3 finishes. I think widening the net like that solves a couple of the problems inherent in just looking at who won.


Very interesting stuff. Thanks a lot.
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1756 » by Ballerhogger » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:58 pm

Dupp wrote:
Openheimer wrote:
chaimer wrote:IMO this is the very peak of Harden's MVP case hype. Once Durant is back, Harden will get less and less credit for Nets success, even if they finish with the best record in the East or entire NBA. Agree?

No because even a blind man can see harden is the engine and possibly the best player even when Durant was there and his absence has made it crystal clear who the main man now on offense is. The Durant absence just reaffirmed how great harden is at carrying teams.

He may be right. It’s gonna be very tricky for harden to get the respect he deserves in this race. The early season narrative might even be unshakable for the voters this year.

Agreed the rockets weren’t doing decent when he was playing there . He could been balling and still been unhappy but he wasn’t
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1757 » by Ballerhogger » Sat Mar 6, 2021 8:59 pm

If KD misses more than 25 games harden has real shot. I’ll give him that
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,394
And1: 67,145
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1758 » by Dupp » Sat Mar 6, 2021 9:08 pm

Ballerhogger wrote:If KD misses more than 25 games harden has real shot. I’ll give him that



He’s already missed 14 games so it’s not that unlikely he misses 25
Ballerhogger
RealGM
Posts: 47,741
And1: 17,306
Joined: Jul 06, 2014
       

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1759 » by Ballerhogger » Sat Mar 6, 2021 9:12 pm

Dupp wrote:
Ballerhogger wrote:If KD misses more than 25 games harden has real shot. I’ll give him that



He’s already missed 14 games so it’s not that unlikely he misses 25

Dang that’s a lot but yea that’s fair that’s good chunk of the season
User avatar
Sark
RealGM
Posts: 19,274
And1: 16,051
Joined: Sep 21, 2010
Location: Merry Pills
 

Re: NBA MVP Discussion 20/21 

Post#1760 » by Sark » Sat Mar 6, 2021 10:06 pm

RB34 wrote:
scrabbarista wrote:Jokic became the second center with 50 triple doubles, but he did it like 200 games faster than the first, Wilt Chamberlain.

When asked about it, Joker said, "It's an honor to be in that group. Wait... is it a group? There's only two of us." :lol:


Wow that’s an insane little stat.

200 games faster than Wilt? borderline unbelievable with the crazy stat lines Wilt put up..



If they tracked blocks and steals, Wilt probably had 50 triple doubles in 1962 alone.

Return to The General Board