It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,324
And1: 6,814
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#181 » by life_saver » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:39 pm

teke184 wrote:
SF_Warriors wrote:
Warchant wrote:Well if Wiggins has been underwhelming or a bust what has Love been on the Cavs? At least Wiggins plays


Love made all star games in cleveland and won a chip.. What has wiggins accomplished?


Getting Jimmy Butler to “nope” his way out of Minny.

Butler’s got issues but you can’t knock the drive and effort of him as a former late pick who transformed into a big star. And his criticism of Wiggins and KAT was spot on.

Clubbing Wiggins with KAT when it comes to effort, drive etc is just stupid...if KAT didn't put in effort or didn't have drive, then Wolves would be having a record like 15-16 wins right now instead of 27 wins
teke184
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,344
And1: 1,391
Joined: Jul 02, 2012
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#182 » by teke184 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 4:41 pm

Was KAT showing this life before Butler called the two of them out and lead the B squad to victory in a team scrimmage?

It may be a testament to KAT that he took criticism and stepped up. Unlike Wiggins.
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#183 » by mplsfonz23 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:01 pm

Quentin wrote:
donemilio21 wrote:Could somebody please explain why you would sign your rookie to a max extension after his 3rd year? He will be an RFA. What do you have to lose in waiting and matching the best offer he gets? It is not going to be more than the max extension you already signed.
Not specific to Wiggins or Minny. Just looking for the logic behind it.


Glen Taylor is the owner. He wanted a promise from Wiggins that he would improve before he offered the contract. I think it took Wiggins a month before he ended up signing the contract that was sitting in front of him. What was he doing for that month? Having it converted to audio so he could kinda understand it? Was he in the middle of a Fortnite tournament and couldn't be bothered with it? Maybe he was hibernating?

Regardless, GT is a big dumb dope of an owner and that's all you need to know about why? We Wolves fans ask that all the time.


GT may be a dope, but make no mistake, some team was going to offer him the max.
True Sports
Sophomore
Posts: 200
And1: 105
Joined: May 24, 2018
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#184 » by True Sports » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:02 pm

Based off the standards that were placed on him I would say yes. Everyone thought that he would be the next T-Mac or Kobe. He could still become an All-Star but his peak is at least Joe Johnson
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#185 » by mplsfonz23 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:09 pm

teke184 wrote:Was KAT showing this life before Butler called the two of them out and lead the B squad to victory in a team scrimmage?

It may be a testament to KAT that he took criticism and stepped up. Unlike Wiggins.


Well considering KAT was rookie of the year.....People assumed Butler was lumping KAT in with Wiggins because Butler didn't name names. KAT has been putting up double doubles since his first game. If Towns took a step back it was to open up for Butler after he came in and acted as if it was his team and they need him. Butler did more damage to this team with his diva attitude, and instead of going to whomever he thought was soft, he ran his mouth to the media. Trust me, most Wolves fans are glad he's gone playoff's or not.
User avatar
PlatinumState
Veteran
Posts: 2,767
And1: 3,236
Joined: Jul 26, 2016
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#186 » by PlatinumState » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:11 pm

williamsonfox wrote:Overpaid and wasn't worthy of the #1 pick when Embiid was there. He isn't a bust. Anthony Bennett was a bust. Fultz is a bust if he doesn't play well for the Magic.


Lets not forget Embiid had back and knee injuries in Kansas. Drafting a big man with the first pick knowing that is risky. Thats why he slipped down to #3. Jabari and Wiggs really were the consensus top 2 prospects.
williamsonfox
Freshman
Posts: 76
And1: 33
Joined: Jul 17, 2012
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#187 » by williamsonfox » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:14 pm

PlatinumState wrote:
williamsonfox wrote:Overpaid and wasn't worthy of the #1 pick when Embiid was there. He isn't a bust. Anthony Bennett was a bust. Fultz is a bust if he doesn't play well for the Magic.


Lets not forget Embiid had back and knee injuries in Kansas. Drafting a big man with the first pick knowing that is risky. Thats why he slipped down to #3. Jabari and Wiggs really were the consensus top 2 prospects.


Only mean in hindsight. There weren't too many guys in that draft that are much better than Wiggins... Gordon? Randle? Smart? Lavine? Were those guys worthy of a #1 pick? Embiid was a risk but he showed the most by far in college. Wiggins was the safe pick. I just can't believe the Wolves gave him that max contract extension. No one likes when someone gets paid based on potential alone.
life_saver
General Manager
Posts: 9,324
And1: 6,814
Joined: Nov 08, 2017

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#188 » by life_saver » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:17 pm

teke184 wrote:Was KAT showing this life before Butler called the two of them out and lead the B squad to victory in a team scrimmage?

It may be a testament to KAT that he took criticism and stepped up. Unlike Wiggins.

what are you even saying? It's like people don't even watch players play...KAT was probably the most important player for Wolves last season...he was also 2nd most efficient scorer in league behind Curry last season (ignoring player like DAJ, Gobert who don't really shoot)....how was that not showing life? He also did average 25+ ppg @ 60% TS in his 2nd season & also had an excellent rookie season
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,819
And1: 67,499
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#189 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:24 pm

PlatinumState wrote:Not a bust at all because he can score 15 in his sleep. Overpaid sure.


How is that any different than Andrea Bargnani? Bargnani was a laughable bust, yet even he had a better first 5 years than Wiggins. Give me the first 5 years of Kwame Brown or Bargnani over the first 5 yeas of Wiggins.

The only thing Wiggins has is PPG, that is it. But here is the thing, there are a ton of players that you can give 16 shots and they can get you 17 points. Hell Quin Cook can get you 17 points on 16 shots. Wiggins is just lucky he has been on a horrible team which continually gave him a green light to chuck up as many shots as he wants.

Again since the turn of the century, either than Bennett and Fultz, can you name me a worse #1 overall pick than Wiggins?
NY 567
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,237
And1: 7,438
Joined: Dec 18, 2016

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#190 » by NY 567 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:34 pm

Hard to say he's not, I mean look how much he's regressed from his third year. How does that even happen?
User avatar
bushybrah_
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,641
And1: 1,475
Joined: Jul 28, 2013
Location: ATL
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#191 » by bushybrah_ » Fri Feb 15, 2019 5:51 pm

Definitely a bust. I remember Raptors fans wanted him so badly in 2014. He was getting comparisons to LeBron. I was watching college basketball just for him... what has he done so far ?
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,596
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#192 » by Quentin » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:01 pm

mplsfonz23 wrote:
Quentin wrote:
donemilio21 wrote:Could somebody please explain why you would sign your rookie to a max extension after his 3rd year? He will be an RFA. What do you have to lose in waiting and matching the best offer he gets? It is not going to be more than the max extension you already signed.
Not specific to Wiggins or Minny. Just looking for the logic behind it.


Glen Taylor is the owner. He wanted a promise from Wiggins that he would improve before he offered the contract. I think it took Wiggins a month before he ended up signing the contract that was sitting in front of him. What was he doing for that month? Having it converted to audio so he could kinda understand it? Was he in the middle of a Fortnite tournament and couldn't be bothered with it? Maybe he was hibernating?

Regardless, GT is a big dumb dope of an owner and that's all you need to know about why? We Wolves fans ask that all the time.


GT may be a dope, but make no mistake, some team was going to offer him the max.


I love it when people talk like they know what would have happened. Nostradamus alert! No, he wouldn't have. I know this for a fact! :lol:
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#193 » by mplsfonz23 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:11 pm

upriser7 wrote:
teke184 wrote:Was KAT showing this life before Butler called the two of them out and lead the B squad to victory in a team scrimmage?

It may be a testament to KAT that he took criticism and stepped up. Unlike Wiggins.

what are you even saying? It's like people don't even watch players play...KAT was probably the most important player for Wolves last season...he was also 2nd most efficient scorer in league behind Curry last season (ignoring player like DAJ, Gobert who don't really shoot)....how was that not showing life? He also did average 25+ ppg @ 60% TS in his 2nd season & also had an excellent rookie season


Exactly.
mplsfonz23
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,944
And1: 1,310
Joined: Jun 13, 2017
   

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#194 » by mplsfonz23 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:12 pm

Quentin wrote:
mplsfonz23 wrote:
Quentin wrote:
Glen Taylor is the owner. He wanted a promise from Wiggins that he would improve before he offered the contract. I think it took Wiggins a month before he ended up signing the contract that was sitting in front of him. What was he doing for that month? Having it converted to audio so he could kinda understand it? Was he in the middle of a Fortnite tournament and couldn't be bothered with it? Maybe he was hibernating?

Regardless, GT is a big dumb dope of an owner and that's all you need to know about why? We Wolves fans ask that all the time.


GT may be a dope, but make no mistake, some team was going to offer him the max.


I love it when people talk like they know what would have happened. Nostradamus alert! No, he wouldn't have. I know this for a fact! :lol:

They do it all the time. Nice try trolling.
leolozon
General Manager
Posts: 8,309
And1: 7,995
Joined: Nov 08, 2009

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#195 » by leolozon » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:13 pm

Duke4life831 wrote:
PlatinumState wrote:Not a bust at all because he can score 15 in his sleep. Overpaid sure.


How is that any different than Andrea Bargnani? Bargnani was a laughable bust, yet even he had a better first 5 years than Wiggins. Give me the first 5 years of Kwame Brown or Bargnani over the first 5 yeas of Wiggins.

The only thing Wiggins has is PPG, that is it. But here is the thing, there are a ton of players that you can give 16 shots and they can get you 17 points. Hell Quin Cook can get you 17 points on 16 shots. Wiggins is just lucky he has been on a horrible team which continually gave him a green light to chuck up as many shots as he wants.

Again since the turn of the century, either than Bennett and Fultz, can you name me a worse #1 overall pick than Wiggins?


I went to look at Bargnani and it's actually close. Wiggins was better for his first 3 years and then Bargnani was better for his 4th and 5th year. Bargnani seems to actually have some progress in his 3rd and 4th year.

I think Wiggins is lucky to be this athletic and be on a team that allow him to shoot 17 times a game, if not he would be out of the league. He wasn't even good when he was given his extension, but all you heard was : "Well, he's athletic, he'll become a good player. He's still young." I guess athleticism isn't everything.
taikibansei
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,966
And1: 11,285
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#196 » by taikibansei » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:16 pm

Quentin wrote:
mplsfonz23 wrote:
Quentin wrote:
Glen Taylor is the owner. He wanted a promise from Wiggins that he would improve before he offered the contract. I think it took Wiggins a month before he ended up signing the contract that was sitting in front of him. What was he doing for that month? Having it converted to audio so he could kinda understand it? Was he in the middle of a Fortnite tournament and couldn't be bothered with it? Maybe he was hibernating?

Regardless, GT is a big dumb dope of an owner and that's all you need to know about why? We Wolves fans ask that all the time.


GT may be a dope, but make no mistake, some team was going to offer him the max.


I love it when people talk like they know what would have happened. Nostradamus alert! No, he wouldn't have. I know this for a fact! :lol:


Yeah, Wiggins was the first player to ever sign what is called a "maximum rookie contract extension"--a new provision put in place, with new adjustments, to help teams lock-in their young talents. In other words, Wiggins got the five-year max under terms which only the Twolves could have offered. So basically the Twolves bid against themselves...well done there GT!

I have posted the stats numerous times--Wiggins has ranked between 150-350 in just about every advanced stat category since his rookie year, and has never had a season with a positive BPM or VORP over his career. He has done this as the first option, the second option and the third option under various coaches and while playing with point guards of varying styles and skill-levels. Wiggins' sole good quality is health--the guy has missed only about 15 games over his entire career. Other than that, he is what he is: a bad player who hurts the team more often than he helps.

I remain curious to know if Wiggins is the only max salary player in NBA history to have never had a season with a positive BPM or VORP over his career.
RIP magnumt--you're literally why I'm still here on these boards.
RIP The Hater--keep up the good fight in the great beyond.
Duke4life831
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 36,819
And1: 67,499
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#197 » by Duke4life831 » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:17 pm

leolozon wrote:
Duke4life831 wrote:
PlatinumState wrote:Not a bust at all because he can score 15 in his sleep. Overpaid sure.


How is that any different than Andrea Bargnani? Bargnani was a laughable bust, yet even he had a better first 5 years than Wiggins. Give me the first 5 years of Kwame Brown or Bargnani over the first 5 yeas of Wiggins.

The only thing Wiggins has is PPG, that is it. But here is the thing, there are a ton of players that you can give 16 shots and they can get you 17 points. Hell Quin Cook can get you 17 points on 16 shots. Wiggins is just lucky he has been on a horrible team which continually gave him a green light to chuck up as many shots as he wants.

Again since the turn of the century, either than Bennett and Fultz, can you name me a worse #1 overall pick than Wiggins?


I went to look at Bargnani and it's actually close. Wiggins was better for his first 3 years and then Bargnani was better for his 4th and 5th year. Bargnani seems to actually have some progress in his 3rd and 4th year.

I think Wiggins his lucky to be this athletic, if not he would be out of the league. He wasn't even good when he was given his extension, but all you heard was : "Well, he's athletic, he'll become a good player. He's still young." I guess athleticism isn't everything.


Ya that is why I wouldnt be shocked if he will struggle to be a rotation player after this big contract is up. He will be 28 when this contract is up, by then teams wont still be using the potential tag with him anymore. He got paid solely off of his athleticism and draft position. I get it, they were hoping he would progress, just never happened.
User avatar
PlatinumState
Veteran
Posts: 2,767
And1: 3,236
Joined: Jul 26, 2016
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#198 » by PlatinumState » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:25 pm

I've been noticing a trend of players playing hard and showing potential until they get that second contract at 23........then they got nothing to play for anymore. They can pretty much run on cruise control until 28 then resign a few one year deals and call it a day and retire at 31..........not a bad life honestly. Most players wont get a championship so they figure why train hard and work on my game when I can just coast and get 100-200 m and retire at 30?
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,596
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#199 » by Quentin » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:27 pm

mplsfonz23 wrote:
Quentin wrote:
mplsfonz23 wrote:
GT may be a dope, but make no mistake, some team was going to offer him the max.


I love it when people talk like they know what would have happened. Nostradamus alert! No, he wouldn't have. I know this for a fact! :lol:

They do it all the time. Nice try trolling.


Trolling? :lol: That's what someone says when they know they're wrong and have nothing else to prove it. Thanks!
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,219
And1: 2,782
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: It's been 5 yrs. Can we now say Andrew Wiggins is a Bust? 

Post#200 » by pcbothwel » Fri Feb 15, 2019 6:40 pm

heatwillbeback wrote:I wouldn’t say bust because he is a serviceable starter.

But he has underperformed to expectations.


Why are people perpetuating this myth? Wiggins IS NOT serviceable and is a DEEP bench player at best.
Look at what Kwame, Bargnani, Tyrus Thomas, etc. did from 20-25... In what ways are these players "Bust", but Wiggins isnt?

Return to The General Board


cron