Harcore Fenton Mun wrote:SkyBill40 wrote:Harcore Fenton Mun wrote:You put somebody 40lbs less, it's not going to be a fight. It's going to be a beat down.
Look how Demare Carroll did on Lebron. He got lit up at 215.
Actually, that's not always true. Looks at Rodman as a prime example of just how flawed your position on this happens to be. He regularly guarded and out rebounded players significantly larger than him in both mass and height, all with guile, skill, and intelligence. You're vastly overvaluing physical attributes and shorting intangibles. That's perfectly fine to do, but it's pretty narrow and regularly proven to be contradictory.
Yeah, but you're splitting hairs here.
9 out of 10 times im taking the guy with 40lb advantage. He just has to lean on him to win.
I'm not splitting hairs. I'm being honest about all the facets of a professional basketball player and not focusing on one aspect over another. One can choose to see either narrowly or objectively and you're focusing more on the former than the latter. Why? Just because someone is big doesn't mean they're good. I mean look at Ryan Hollins on ESPN: Dude's a legit 7 feet tall... and played on 9 teams in 10 seasons. With that height, he should've done more than what he managed. Or Eddy Curry? Or Kwame Brown? Or any host of other players who washed out despite having decent physical attributes? Why didn't they? Because they lacked in other areas and couldn't make up for it with intangibles.
Stop over valuing physical size as the end all metric. There's far more to it than that.











