Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Bradley Stevens should give Daniel Ainge some of his 'ship bonus if they win it since he constructed nearly the entire roster.
C's won game 1 thanks to Horford and White, both Stevens acquisitions.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Bradley Stevens should give Daniel Ainge some of his 'ship bonus if they win it since he constructed nearly the entire roster.

We were up in the booth with Magic Johnson and he said, 'Look at the Warriors. At the end of the first quarter, everybody's got their hands on their hips.' They looked absolutely exhausted. They took a body blow, and they didn't seem able to handle it. They came out storming in the third quarter but couldn't maintain that efficiency because they didn't appear to have that stamina to keep up with the young thoroughbreds on the Celtics.
liquidswords wrote:So we're just expecting Boston to hit 20 3's a game and have White/Smart/Horford go ballistic all series?
KamikazeK wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Bradley Stevens should give Daniel Ainge some of his 'ship bonus if they win it since he constructed nearly the entire roster.
C's won game 1 thanks to Horford and White, both Stevens acquisitions.

KamikazeK wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Bradley Stevens should give Daniel Ainge some of his 'ship bonus if they win it since he constructed nearly the entire roster.
C's won game 1 thanks to Horford and White, both Stevens acquisitions.

DreamTeam09 wrote:KamikazeK wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Bradley Stevens should give Daniel Ainge some of his 'ship bonus if they win it since he constructed nearly the entire roster.
C's won game 1 thanks to Horford and White, both Stevens acquisitions.
Yeah if anything, this should look a little bad on Ainge. He refused to part with picks to get another guy or to round out the roster. Stevens did that year 1 in position.
soxfan2003 wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:KamikazeK wrote:C's won game 1 thanks to Horford and White, both Stevens acquisitions.
Yeah if anything, this should look a little bad on Ainge. He refused to part with picks to get another guy or to round out the roster. Stevens did that year 1 in position.
Why it really looks bad on Ainge is he gave Kemba Walker with multiple knee surgeries a huge max contract when Marcus Smart was a better PG for winning an actual championship with the rest of this Celtics roster.
What makes it perplexing is Ainge himself knows that your don't need a traditional PG to win championships and he also repeatedly said small PG's often have it much harder in the playoffs. Neither Dennis Johnson or Ainge were traditional PGs. Both combo guards. So many other PG's with really just combo guard skills have won it all.
Even many years before Kemba signing, I always felt PG and not SG was Marcus Smart's best position overall.
If you have Smart as a SG, you really are giving up an advantage you have since chances are the PG will not a very good defender.
I realize this years Celtics team odds were enhanced due to injuries to other teams but at the same time, if so many resources including time were not wasted on IT, Kyrie Irving and Kemba Walker the Celtics in much better shape. In the case of IT, I was for the deal but I never thought the Celtics would build their entire offense around him and play him tons of minutes. That style of team very unlikely to win it all. There was some logic to the Kyrie Irving trade but Kemba Walker made zero sense.

Wolfgang630 wrote:Man if Boston could pull this out and Horford wins MVP would be a great story.

soxfan2003 wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:KamikazeK wrote:C's won game 1 thanks to Horford and White, both Stevens acquisitions.
Yeah if anything, this should look a little bad on Ainge. He refused to part with picks to get another guy or to round out the roster. Stevens did that year 1 in position.
Why it really looks bad on Ainge is he gave Kemba Walker with multiple knee surgeries a huge max contract when Marcus Smart was a better PG for winning an actual championship with the rest of this Celtics roster.
What makes it perplexing is Ainge himself knows that your don't need a traditional PG to win championships and he also repeatedly said small PG's often have it much harder in the playoffs. Neither Dennis Johnson or Ainge were traditional PGs. Both combo guards. So many other PG's with really just combo guard skills have won it all.
Even many years before Kemba signing, I always felt PG and not SG was Marcus Smart's best position overall.
If you have Smart as a SG, you really are giving up an advantage you have since chances are the PG will not a very good defender.
I realize this years Celtics team odds were enhanced due to injuries to other teams but at the same time, if so many resources including time were not wasted on IT, Kyrie Irving and Kemba Walker the Celtics in much better shape. In the case of IT, I was for the deal but I never thought the Celtics would build their entire offense around him and play him tons of minutes. That style of team very unlikely to win it all. There was some logic to the Kyrie Irving trade but Kemba Walker made zero sense.
hugepatsfan wrote:soxfan2003 wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:
Yeah if anything, this should look a little bad on Ainge. He refused to part with picks to get another guy or to round out the roster. Stevens did that year 1 in position.
Why it really looks bad on Ainge is he gave Kemba Walker with multiple knee surgeries a huge max contract when Marcus Smart was a better PG for winning an actual championship with the rest of this Celtics roster.
What makes it perplexing is Ainge himself knows that your don't need a traditional PG to win championships and he also repeatedly said small PG's often have it much harder in the playoffs. Neither Dennis Johnson or Ainge were traditional PGs. Both combo guards. So many other PG's with really just combo guard skills have won it all.
Even many years before Kemba signing, I always felt PG and not SG was Marcus Smart's best position overall.
If you have Smart as a SG, you really are giving up an advantage you have since chances are the PG will not a very good defender.
I realize this years Celtics team odds were enhanced due to injuries to other teams but at the same time, if so many resources including time were not wasted on IT, Kyrie Irving and Kemba Walker the Celtics in much better shape. In the case of IT, I was for the deal but I never thought the Celtics would build their entire offense around him and play him tons of minutes. That style of team very unlikely to win it all. There was some logic to the Kyrie Irving trade but Kemba Walker made zero sense.
A little unfair on Kemba here. He has no injury history or concerns when we signed him. He was a legitimate all star for us and then he had a midseason injury. Kembas time in Boston going down like it did was genuinely bad luck in the same way Haywards was.
Very fair point that they should have went with Smart at PG over a scorer. But Kemba was legit that first year until a random injury derailed his career.
DreamTeam09 wrote:Boston fans, why did Marcus smart seemingly get bench for a large stretch last night. Ino White was hot and ino smart can stagnate things at times. I guess what I'm really asking is, White at his best and Smart at his best, whos the better option in the backcourt next to Brown
DreamTeam09 wrote:Boston fans, why did Marcus smart seemingly get bench for a large stretch last night. Ino White was hot and ino smart can stagnate things at times. I guess what I'm really asking is, White at his best and Smart at his best, whos the better option in the backcourt next to Brown
Higgs Boston wrote:
Kemba had knee issues, he had a surgery before signing with celtics, he was an old midget inefficient scorer and horrible defender that depended on speed, it was a terrible signing with or without injuries.
Cricket23 wrote:Sticking with Boston in 6, even though I think they also win game 2. I see GS taking 3 and 5.
Glad to not see any bitching about the refs for a change.
Very predictable are the takes about unsustainable shooting, and the multiple appropriate counterpoints have already been given. Boston hasn't been shooting 50% from 3 for all of 2022, yet they've been steamrolling teams.
If I were a Warriors fan, I'd be concerned about Green's postgame comments. His notion of 42 minute dominance is silly, but if he thinks that was GS playing dominating basketball then perhaps he doesn't expect them to play much better? GS should be more concerned than they seem to be instead of hoping for the best.
GS could obviously win the next game, but I'm leaning towards Boston pummeling them right from the opening tip. Tatum and Brown weren't emotionally ready for game 1. Brown got there eventually, and they'll all be there for the start of game 2.