Klomp wrote:thinktank wrote:Bob8 wrote:
Yes, I made a mistake, it's Naz.
Hayes is total non factor in Lakers, he's on minimum contract. Gobert is 4x best defensive player, getting 44 mio. Expectations are not the same. 2 points and 6 rebounds in 24 minutes for 44 mio player is pretty bad.
I wonder what kind of a team would have Wolves had, if they didn't give that much for Gobert? Probably far the best in the West.
Just one of the mistakes you made. Let’s get you to realize some others.
Game 1:
Wolves win by exactly 22 points.
Gobert plays 24 minutes, exactly half the game.
Gobert is +14, 63% of the teams’ margin of victory.
And this is getting played off the floor to you?![]()
![]()
How can you look yourself in the mirror in the morning with a straight face? You’re living in a dream-world!
In no way, shape, or form is that getting played off the court. None whatsoever.
Lakers lose by 22.
Hayes plays 8 minutes, 15% of the game.
Hayes is -11, exactly half the teams’ margin of loss.
THAT, is what getting played off the floor looks like.
Sounds like Lakers need a 44 million dollar center right about now!
This part of the discussion is just a laughably bad look for the Lakers fan base.
The Lakers made an adjustment to go from Hayes to their small-ball lineup, great. But did you not account for the fact that the opponent is allowed to counter with its own substitutions as well?
The brilliant thing about Minnesota's roster construction, is the roster is not filled with inflated egos of self-proclaimed kings and Slovenian mobsters. The Timberwolves don't take a smaller role in one game as an attack on their character, but instead as an adjustment needed to win the basketball game. Last I checked, that's what is most important in each playoff series: Who gets to 4 wins first.
It's not the first time Gobert has played just 24 minutes in a game and it won't be the last. The flaw in the Lakers strategy is that they probably thought that if it wasn't Gobert out there, it would be Garza. After all, that's essentially LA's roster conundrum with Len. But on the contrary, Minnesota also has its own small-ball lineup that has been humming along and is quite deadly in its own right, as the Lakers have now witnessed firsthand.
Do you think post like yours isn't bad look for the Wolves fan base?
I didn't see any Lakers fans talking bad about your fan base or about Wolves players. Is talking about inflated egos, self proclaimed kings and Slovenian mobsters really necessary? How you see Ant? Modest hard working man maybe?
Btw. Slovenian mobster has killed you last year.


















