FarBeyondDriven wrote:irregardless, narratives are born brick by brick and he now has earned the foundation of one, that being he's a choker. It doesn't mean it'll stick or become a distant memory after he makes a bunch of big shots in big moments in the future. But it exists and deservedly so. And if he has a few more failures in the clutch without offsetting with some game-winners the label is unfortunately going to stick. This is how it works. Hell, Tatum is still considered a choker by many because he hasn't done enough to shed the label yet.
Narratives are born because people need simplified and emotional explanations of what they are watching - sometimes these are correct, sometimes they stick because one player isn't likable, sometimes they are simply flawed. Flagg had 27-7-4-2-3 on 60TS% with 1TOV, the rest of the team scored 40PTS on 49TS%, if your explanation is that Flagg failed at the big moment, then ... let it be. 
What a choker. 
LakerLegend wrote:Better freshman..Flagg or Durant?
Durant was an all-time great scoring talent, but had many more question marks: his physical combines were bad, skinny 6'10' dude making a long NBA career was a question, he had defensive tools, but wasn't an impactful defender, his playmaking was non-existent. 
Flagg was a better player as a FR in my eyes, as a prospect you can argue both ways, but I'd lean towards Cooper as well. The only thing you can criticize him for after the full season is that he didn't win a championship.