Just speaking personally, the first time I really got a good look at the amount of dimes in LA...
Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Frank Mulely
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,847
- And1: 649
- Joined: Sep 04, 2009
- Location: gone phishing
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Anybody who thinks Dwight will leave LA clearly hasn't partied in LA
Just speaking personally, the first time I really got a good look at the amount of dimes in LA...
Just speaking personally, the first time I really got a good look at the amount of dimes in LA...
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Viper1500
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,924
- And1: 2,801
- Joined: Apr 15, 2009
- Location: Orlando, FL
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
TruSkool wrote:Mitch DONT do it, the lakers are very capable as is
Watching Dwight since ever, he will be even better along side Steve Nash. L.A would be crazy not to do this. Kobe will no longer be the opposing teams main priority, it'll be Nash+Howard. I've been praying for ages to have a legit pg next to Dwight, and if L.A has even a slight chance of retaining him, it should be an easy yes.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Wade2k6
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,104
- And1: 77
- Joined: May 29, 2004
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
This Dwight Howard saga is getting really old. I hope Orlando doesn't trade him and he's forced to play somewhere other than LA and Brooklyn when he becomes a FA.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- whocurrz
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,259
- And1: 1,491
- Joined: Apr 14, 2011
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I would be pissed if I was a Laker fan and they traded Bynum for an unextended Howard, especially if they'd have to give up more. Mostly because Howard's most recent back issues. Bynum is injury prone but at least you know he's going into next season healthy which should be a major factor for a team in win now mode.
Like others have said though, I doubt they make the trade if they don't think he'll resign. Lakers rarely get hustled, unless Stern can overrule.
Like others have said though, I doubt they make the trade if they don't think he'll resign. Lakers rarely get hustled, unless Stern can overrule.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
TheXFactor
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,976
- And1: 31
- Joined: Apr 19, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Viper1500 wrote:TruSkool wrote:Mitch DONT do it, the lakers are very capable as is
Watching Dwight since ever, he will be even better along side Steve Nash. L.A would be crazy not to do this. Kobe will no longer be the opposing teams main priority, it'll be Nash+Howard. I've been praying for ages to have a legit pg next to Dwight, and if L.A has even a slight chance of retaining him, it should be an easy yes.
Agreed. Lakers need more defense than offense, and Howard provides this.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
followwind
- Ballboy
- Posts: 43
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 24, 2009
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
chubby_1_kenobi wrote:Levity wrote:chubby_1_kenobi wrote:I think the FO are fools for taking this gamble if the report is true.
if LA did trade for dwight and he did leave, as so many posters are speculating; well, where do you see him going, realistically? most likely, brooklyn wont be an option by then.
Dallas would be my guess but who knows? When an unrestricted FA like Howard is on the market, crazy stuff are going to be happening with teams trying to clear cap space to sign him. The Lakers should not be a part of that wild goosechase after acquiring someone like Steve Nash. Keep it simple, keep it conservative.
Conservative aint gonna win you anything. This team as it is still gets beat by the Thunders. Adding Dwight, who is a sure 20-10 nightly contributor (unlike Bynum's disappearing act here and there) will only make this team better.
They are already going all in with Nash, and if anything, the Buss family always gamble and they rarely got the short end of the stick.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Lakersmylife
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,262
- And1: 11
- Joined: Feb 15, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
It's tough, but DO IT MITCH!!!! A Dwight/Nash/Pau/Kobe core gets us ahead of OKC.
rockmanslim wrote:I want to have Vince Carter's babies
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- lodom7
- Senior
- Posts: 608
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
the only concern the lakers FO has is Howard's back

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- SheedsWeed
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,931
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 30, 2004
- Location: to all the killas and the hundred dolla billas
- Contact:
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
How is Howard's back anyway? I don't think I've heard anything about it since he had surgery.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- lodom7
- Senior
- Posts: 608
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
SheedsWeed wrote:How is Howard's back anyway? I don't think I've heard anything about it since he had surgery.
apparantly it is the only thing keeping the lakers from pulling the trigger

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
MannyRam99
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,321
- And1: 33
- Joined: Apr 28, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Frank Mulely wrote:MannyRam99 wrote:good.
Dwight will extend next summer, I'm sure of it. Just get the deal done.
When Westbrook blows by Nash we will need Howard in the paint to meet him.
I've been saying this. If they can trade Bynum straight up for Howard, Lakers have to do it.
Dwight ain't leaving a Lakers team with Kobe / Pau / Nash to play with Deron and Joe Johnson. c'mon son. Also, socal is just too fun for a 20-something superstar. He is NOT leaving if they trade for him, I don't care what anybody says, even him. He'll change his mind and sign a long term deal without a shadow of a doubt.
Exactly.
Lakers are not about being conservative when trying to compete, I wanna be the CLEAR CUT best team in the west. As of right now, OKC can still beat us somewhat handily, we need defense.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- RHBullsFan
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,544
- And1: 52
- Joined: Mar 03, 2005
- Location: Tampa, FL
- Contact:
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I think his back ailment got considerably better the moment Stan was fired.
A Nash/Howard connection would be unstoppable, and one we've dreamed about for the last few years in Orlando.
A Nash/Howard connection would be unstoppable, and one we've dreamed about for the last few years in Orlando.
Old School Magic Fan since 1990
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
Shaheen
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,767
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 01, 2010
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.
Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.
Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.
Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.
Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- whocurrz
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,259
- And1: 1,491
- Joined: Apr 14, 2011
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
I thought the back thing was just a tactic so he didn't have to play for SVG, but then he decided to have surgery and weren't there reports that Howard is expected to miss the beginning of the season. Rushing him back would be terrible which is why they'd need an extension. Even then that's a bit risky as back injuries and ailments can have a major effect on one's career.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
TayP
- Junior
- Posts: 447
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 05, 2012
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Do they not know that the Nets could still find away to get him? All the Nets have to do is fine a taker for Lopez+filler+3million cash if Lakers don't want him to another team and sign Dwight. Dwill starting salary is $17.1 million with a 7.5% increase couldn't Howard lower his 1st year salary and get a higher increase over time? If Nets can't do that then Dallas could sign him. They have `18-20 million of cap space depending on if the cap is 58 or 61 million. If they amnesty Hayward that's is another 9 million off the cap. They could sign Dwight and still have 12 million left.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Zedders
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,741
- And1: 613
- Joined: Apr 27, 2012
-
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.
Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.
Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.
Someone is scared.
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jazza2319
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,387
- And1: 128
- Joined: Feb 06, 2011
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Us Laker fans have to be realistic for a second, Drew being healthy this past season was a rarity. Not saying he cant do it going forward, but i'd rather take a risk on IronDwight coming off back surgery than Drew's knees
Dwight and Pau are instantly the best 4-5 duo in the league and if we can grab either Grant Hill or Dorell Wright and re-sign Ebanks, i like our defense going into next season
Dwight and Pau are instantly the best 4-5 duo in the league and if we can grab either Grant Hill or Dorell Wright and re-sign Ebanks, i like our defense going into next season

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Jazza2319
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,387
- And1: 128
- Joined: Feb 06, 2011
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Shaheen wrote:Yeah just like Houston didn't require the extension and GSW didn't require the extension. Call me when a team actually gives up its main assets for Dwight without an extension.
Cause till then these rumors just sound stupid. Bynum AND Dwight both have to agree to extensions for these deals to work.
Also, for people who say Dwight can't leave. He can easily go to Dallas and Dallas has enough cap space to sign CP3 or another big FA.
CP3 isn't going to Dallas, he's staying right in Clipperland. Dwight's only option is Dallas which doesn't look too appealing right now

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
-
KrazySixersD
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,779
- And1: 1,008
- Joined: Jul 16, 2008
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
Flipdog69xxx wrote:Cares wrote:Hell no...sign that extension bitch!
whose in your avi bro?
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
- Typhoon20
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,991
- And1: 4
- Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard
People people people. We're talking about DWIGHT here.
No way is he gonna resign with LA this guy doesn't care about winning a ring the only thing he wants is Brooklyn. He wants to be THE GUY on that team playing for that city.
No way is he gonna resign with LA this guy doesn't care about winning a ring the only thing he wants is Brooklyn. He wants to be THE GUY on that team playing for that city.










