Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, ken6199, Domejandro, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- Lord Eder
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,903
- And1: 16,632
- Joined: May 30, 2004
- Location: Saint-Denis
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
None of the pieces they got replaced what Harden gave them to make them the contender that they were. They got a good haul, for sure, but they took a step back. Should've just paid him.

"Jerome Moiso with 2 rebounds and a steal.... Put him in the hall of fame!"
- Chuck Swirsky
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- 22haytham22
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,041
- And1: 7,265
- Joined: Apr 19, 2011
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
LikeABosh wrote:We'll have to see how Lamb and Shabazz turn out
Actually, nvm. It was a bad trade
Maybe your joking? Shabazz was not drafted by OKC....OKC drafted Steven Adams

TreadMilling Since 1995
Darain wrote:Dude is like 6-10, 6-12 at the most
But he is definitely not 7 foot
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,462
- And1: 1,140
- Joined: Dec 28, 2010
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
If you consider it was an awful move to choose Ibaka over Harden, than yes, it was a failure. But Thunder traded a top 15 player in the league at worst, for sheer and raw potential.
I still believe Jeremy Lamb easily has potential to be a top 10 shooting guard in the league and probably would be a top 3 pick in this year's draft.
Steven Adams looks like he's going to be either Thabeet, or a more explosive-strong-athletic version of Asik with better shotblocking ability(have to learn to secure the defensive rebound, though). You can argue that his upside is still a reach at 12, even more knowing his bust potential, can't argue that he doesn't have top 10 C potential with all that quickness, explosiveness, sheer strenght and athleticism and toughness to be active on defense.
Thunder still has a lot of potential, but just the assets Thunder got with this trade are far from being sure things.
I still believe Jeremy Lamb easily has potential to be a top 10 shooting guard in the league and probably would be a top 3 pick in this year's draft.
Steven Adams looks like he's going to be either Thabeet, or a more explosive-strong-athletic version of Asik with better shotblocking ability(have to learn to secure the defensive rebound, though). You can argue that his upside is still a reach at 12, even more knowing his bust potential, can't argue that he doesn't have top 10 C potential with all that quickness, explosiveness, sheer strenght and athleticism and toughness to be active on defense.
Thunder still has a lot of potential, but just the assets Thunder got with this trade are far from being sure things.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,506
- And1: 530
- Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
It was safe to call that trade a failure after the first week of the season. Honestly that might be the worst move I've witnessed in the time I've watched basketball.
Lakers fan since 99.
PCProductions wrote:NBA has probably the most parity of any pro sport.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,148
- And1: 726
- Joined: Sep 16, 2007
- Location: Greece
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
It was terrible, but obviously not an usalvageable situation for OKC.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- Luigi
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,027
- And1: 3,590
- Joined: Aug 13, 2009
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Fobbie wrote:Luigi wrote:Fobbie wrote:
Still doesn't change the fact that they traded a top 3 sg/15 player in his prime for #12 pick, Lamb, and K-Mart. Unless Lamb or the center they pick up with the 12 pick turns into a solid player, they basically gave away Harden..
I don't think Harden is a top 15 player. He's got a nice 3 pt / drive for free throws game, but he's missing a lot on both ends to be top 15.
I could be misremembering, but wasn't it a financial choice between Harden and Westbrook?
Between Ibaka and Harden. LOL i was being generous saying top 15.. Some think he's top 10. But either way, a 23 year old franchise player for right now seem to be peanut..
Right. Now I remember. Choosing Ibaka was a mistake in retrospect. I can see what OKC was doing. I mean, you have RW and KD on the perimeter, keeping interior defense makes sense for the team composition instead of putting it all on the offensive perimeter. But Ibaka hasn't become more than a shot blocker.
In '03-'04, Jerry Sloan coached the ESPN predicted "worst team of all time" to 42-40.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 29,174
- And1: 3,948
- Joined: Jan 19, 2009
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
I don't think there is any waiting.
I don't see Martin getting them anything in sign and trade since they want to stay under the tax, otherwise they would sign him themselves. Teams under the cap won't offer a TE since they can sign him outright.
Also, they don't have an unlimited window for contention. I think they could have made it back to the Finals this year with Harden, even with the RW injury, but did not.
Their final offer was about $5m less than what Harden got which translates to only $1.5m or so per year. Yes, it was pushing the salary limits, but a. you have to pay to win and b. he still would have been trade-able this coming year before his extension kicked in.
Plus.. I think I did the numbers and they did not have to be a tax team. Their bench would have been mostly minimum guys and they would have had to amnesty Perkins, but it was doable.
I don't see Martin getting them anything in sign and trade since they want to stay under the tax, otherwise they would sign him themselves. Teams under the cap won't offer a TE since they can sign him outright.
Also, they don't have an unlimited window for contention. I think they could have made it back to the Finals this year with Harden, even with the RW injury, but did not.
Their final offer was about $5m less than what Harden got which translates to only $1.5m or so per year. Yes, it was pushing the salary limits, but a. you have to pay to win and b. he still would have been trade-able this coming year before his extension kicked in.
Plus.. I think I did the numbers and they did not have to be a tax team. Their bench would have been mostly minimum guys and they would have had to amnesty Perkins, but it was doable.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- Joao Saraiva
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,341
- And1: 6,141
- Joined: Feb 09, 2011
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Yes it is a failure.
OKC were not patient and ended up trading Harden who can be a top player in the league for many years. Either you get another top player or the trade is a failure.
I don't think any of those guys can be a top 5 player in the league. About Harden, I don't know. At least top 7 he can be. So it was a big failure.
OKC were not patient and ended up trading Harden who can be a top player in the league for many years. Either you get another top player or the trade is a failure.
I don't think any of those guys can be a top 5 player in the league. About Harden, I don't know. At least top 7 he can be. So it was a big failure.
“These guys have been criticized the last few years for not getting to where we’re going, but I’ve always said that the most important thing in sports is to keep trying. Let this be an example of what it means to say it’s never over.” - Jerry Sloan
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- Neutral 123
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,500
- And1: 2,881
- Joined: Nov 12, 2009
- Location: Pandora
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
Apollo64 wrote:It was terrible, but obviously not an usalvageable situation for OKC.
Sadly, I don't see them saving it. Durant and Westbrook will probably leave too now. what a shame, and it seems it had more to do with management arrogance than anything else.
.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,507
- And1: 1,009
- Joined: Jun 24, 2009
- Location: Las Vegas
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
I wonder what fallacy has to say about this thread.
Yes it was a bad trade. Will Lamb and Adams pan out? It's possible. Will it ease the pain of losing harden? Most likely not.
Yes it was a bad trade. Will Lamb and Adams pan out? It's possible. Will it ease the pain of losing harden? Most likely not.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,680
- And1: 642
- Joined: Jan 26, 2010
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
a bad trade from the start and it's only gotten worse
and all because they didn't want pay him an extra 5 mil over 4 or 5 years
basically nothing
and all because they didn't want pay him an extra 5 mil over 4 or 5 years
basically nothing
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- jamesnamida
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,146
- And1: 2,048
- Joined: Mar 05, 2011
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
I still think people are overrating harden, without his freethrows his ts is terrible.
He shot like .438%fg and .363 from 3s which is below average for guards at the 3 pointer
Monta Ellis at his worst chuckage mode with the warriors that year he was surrounded by 3 starting dleaguers was a .450 fg % his ts was lower bc he is a bad 3 point shooter, and didn't get to the line as much.
Of course harden has a way better team, so they sneak into the playoffs, and he is legit.
I'd wait a year or two and if the rockets can't get any free agents, people will sour on harden, like many others that come before.
He's better than Ellis of course, but I know that this first year was the honeymoon.
Unless they get Dwight.
He shot like .438%fg and .363 from 3s which is below average for guards at the 3 pointer
Monta Ellis at his worst chuckage mode with the warriors that year he was surrounded by 3 starting dleaguers was a .450 fg % his ts was lower bc he is a bad 3 point shooter, and didn't get to the line as much.
Of course harden has a way better team, so they sneak into the playoffs, and he is legit.
I'd wait a year or two and if the rockets can't get any free agents, people will sour on harden, like many others that come before.
He's better than Ellis of course, but I know that this first year was the honeymoon.
Unless they get Dwight.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- LikeABosh
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,069
- And1: 8,816
- Joined: Jun 15, 2011
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
22haytham22 wrote:LikeABosh wrote:We'll have to see how Lamb and Shabazz turn out
Actually, nvm. It was a bad trade
Maybe your joking? Shabazz was not drafted by OKC....OKC drafted Steven Adams
Joking. OKC should have drafted Shabazz and if they did, Lamb/Shabazz might not have sounded that bad at the time of the trade. Of course Harden really exploded last season so the trade will always look bad for OKC
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- ClayDavis
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,720
- And1: 104
- Joined: Jan 23, 2012
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
jamesnamida wrote:I still think people are overrating harden, without his freethrows his ts is terrible.
He shot like .438%fg and .363 from 3s which is below average for guards at the 3 pointer
Monta Ellis at his worst chuckage mode with the warriors that year he was surrounded by 3 starting dleaguers was a .450 fg % his ts was lower bc he is a bad 3 point shooter, and didn't get to the line as much.
Of course harden has a way better team, so they sneak into the playoffs, and he is legit.
I'd wait a year or two and if the rockets can't get any free agents, people will sour on harden, like many others that come before.
He's better than Ellis of course, but I know that this first year was the honeymoon.
Unless they get Dwight.
thats true, his game is built on flopping but he gets calls. they havent stopped.
in the playoffs is where he is in trouble. this years playoffs showed refs stop with that crap.

Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,437
- And1: 1,191
- Joined: Dec 29, 2012
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
only way to reverse the bad deal now is if Adams becomes HOF center and thunder win several rings.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- Effigy
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,490
- And1: 13,720
- Joined: Nov 27, 2001
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
keloms wrote:Now that it looks like Kevin Martin isn't being renewed, the pick from the Raptors ended up being #12, and Lamb having lowered expectations, do you consider it a failure?
Why wouldn't Martin be renewed? I can't see him getting a big deal elsewhere. But regardless, yes this trade was horrendous for OKC.
Without this trade, I think they would have won a title. Maybe even this year.
Now I really don't think they will ever win one with this group.
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- TruSkool
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,706
- And1: 253
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
OKC seems like a team that doesnt like to pay its players. theyre trying to win championships on rookie contracts, and once the contract expires, they want more good rookies. Although they are a well run franchise, ultimately chemistry matters
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- bwgood77
- Global Mod
- Posts: 97,778
- And1: 60,811
- Joined: Feb 06, 2009
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
-
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
I wouldn't say it was a good trade, but for all we know OKC wins the finals this year if Westbrook doesn't get injured.
Lamb and Adams could also be studs in two years on rookie contracts.
The fact is, with the new CBA, if you are going to have three max guys, you are going to have to go into the tax and will only be able to surround them with minimum type players, and you can probably only afford the tax if you are in a big market.
Lamb and Adams could also be studs in two years on rookie contracts.
The fact is, with the new CBA, if you are going to have three max guys, you are going to have to go into the tax and will only be able to surround them with minimum type players, and you can probably only afford the tax if you are in a big market.
When asked how Fascism starts, Bertrand Russell once said:
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
"First, they fascinate the fools. Then, they muzzle the intelligent."
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- Smash3
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,783
- And1: 9,982
- Joined: Apr 17, 2009
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
The question is when was it not?
8
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
- hayden
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,651
- And1: 548
- Joined: Sep 28, 2006
Re: Harden trade: Safe to call a failure now?
jamesnamida wrote:I still think people are overrating harden, without his freethrows his ts is terrible.
He shot like .438%fg and .363 from 3s which is below average for guards at the 3 pointer
Monta Ellis at his worst chuckage mode with the warriors that year he was surrounded by 3 starting dleaguers was a .450 fg % his ts was lower bc he is a bad 3 point shooter, and didn't get to the line as much.
Of course harden has a way better team, so they sneak into the playoffs, and he is legit.
I'd wait a year or two and if the rockets can't get any free agents, people will sour on harden, like many others that come before.
He's better than Ellis of course, but I know that this first year was the honeymoon.
Unless they get Dwight.
someone in the other Rocket's thread just called them borderline D-leaguers. haha
i like how you mention ts% and disregard his ft shooting when ft% is a third of that stat. and you mention monta ellis who just finished a season shooting .416 on 17.5 attempts. i would say that is monta at his "worst chuckage mode."
LarsV8 wrote:[Jeremy Lin] just isn't very good.