BlzMwt wrote:would have loved to see okc healthy or the clippers play the warriors
point guard matchups would have been incredible
Hopefully we will this year. Depends on match-ups.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
BlzMwt wrote:would have loved to see okc healthy or the clippers play the warriors
point guard matchups would have been incredible

Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Conley & Holiday were injured, Rockets had no guards, and the Cavs had just Dellavedova basically, otherwise they could have made Curry defend a bit more, but yeah, I think what he's saying is, Curry didn't have anyone who made him defend, thereby tiring him on the offensive end, reducing his efficiency.

bondom34 wrote:Lawson was chillin at home.
mvpshaq32 wrote:Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Conley & Holiday were injured, Rockets had no guards, and the Cavs had just Dellavedova basically, otherwise they could have made Curry defend a bit more, but yeah, I think what he's saying is, Curry didn't have anyone who made him defend, thereby tiring him on the offensive end, reducing his efficiency.
That could be it. But even if Warrriors played a team with a dominant PG, their defensive scheme isn't to leave Curry alone on an island with him. Rotations and help will come whether it's Curry or any other of their players.
Lawson is going to tire himself out more trying to go at Curry and the rest of the defense than Curry will expending energy trying to guard Lawson
khufure wrote:prophet_of_rage wrote:He isn't wrong. He's saying Curry didn't have to face an offensive threat during the playoffs. And it's relatively true. He didn't have to work that hard defensively in the playoffs.
Agreed but you don't give someone capable of winning an MVP ... and a likely rival in the playoffs ammunition.
Hector_Reyes_8 wrote:As if Lawson's one to talk about defense.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Glass houses. Lawson has been beyond useless guarding Curry.
nomansland wrote:Now that he's gone, I hope he keeps running his mouth and saying all the stupid **** he wants.
Jadoogar wrote:BudenFerry wrote:Milbuck wrote:Players keep to themselves --> soft era, no intense competition, no rivalries, etc.
Player says something even remotely controversial --> headcase, fool, drunk, etc.
So much this.
Not this at all. What has Lawon accomplished to be able to trash talk? Didn't Curry beat the Nuggets when they played in the playoffs couple years ago?
Nuggets_Talk wrote:nomansland wrote:Now that he's gone, I hope he keeps running his mouth and saying all the stupid **** he wants.
i know we didnt get anything in return but this is the biggest "addition by subtraction" weve had in a long time. so glad ty and his problems are gone.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
nomansland wrote:Nuggets_Talk wrote:nomansland wrote:Now that he's gone, I hope he keeps running his mouth and saying all the stupid **** he wants.
i know we didnt get anything in return but this is the biggest "addition by subtraction" weve had in a long time. so glad ty and his problems are gone.
Maybe the biggest addition by subtraction since Camby.
Being totally honest about it, I'd still rather have the Ty who wasn't a DUI machine and social media whore. He's a good player but he sure did eff over the Nuggets.
walk with me wrote:I hate
"he's a drunk"
"he was chilling at home"
"this guy is useless"
types of responses... what does that have to do with the FACT that ty lawson pointed out? Steph didn't face a starting PG for the entire playoffs. it oesn't dimish the ring or anything but if everyone is healthy next year things cold look very diferent