Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

NBAfan3024
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 7,035
Joined: May 25, 2013
Contact:
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#21 » by NBAfan3024 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 5:50 pm

BlzMwt wrote:would have loved to see okc healthy or the clippers play the warriors

point guard matchups would have been incredible

Hopefully we will this year. Depends on match-ups.
Anttb
Ballboy
Posts: 31
And1: 69
Joined: Aug 02, 2013

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#22 » by Anttb » Thu Oct 1, 2015 5:51 pm

he's not saying anything that's untrue. What good pg did Steph have to defend?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AshyLarrysDiaper
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 16,172
And1: 7,846
Joined: Jul 16, 2004
Location: Oakland

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#23 » by AshyLarrysDiaper » Thu Oct 1, 2015 5:53 pm

Glass houses. Lawson has been beyond useless guarding Curry.
Contribute to the "Fire GarPax" billboard here:
https://www.gofundme.com/3v7fc-let-our-voices-be-heard-firegarpax
User avatar
mvpshaq32
Starter
Posts: 2,342
And1: 2,265
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#24 » by mvpshaq32 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 5:54 pm

Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Conley & Holiday were injured, Rockets had no guards, and the Cavs had just Dellavedova basically, otherwise they could have made Curry defend a bit more, but yeah, I think what he's saying is, Curry didn't have anyone who made him defend, thereby tiring him on the offensive end, reducing his efficiency.


That could be it. But even if Warrriors played a team with a dominant PG, their defensive scheme isn't to leave Curry alone on an island with him. Rotations and help will come whether it's Curry or any other of their players.

Lawson is going to tire himself out more trying to go at Curry and the rest of the defense than Curry will expending energy trying to guard Lawson
Image
User avatar
DoubleLintendre
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,336
And1: 8,657
Joined: Jul 15, 2012
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#25 » by DoubleLintendre » Thu Oct 1, 2015 5:59 pm

bondom34 wrote:Lawson was chillin at home.


:lol:

Spat out some coffee dammit.
Mr.Raptorsingh
RealGM
Posts: 35,018
And1: 28,653
Joined: May 17, 2007
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#26 » by Mr.Raptorsingh » Thu Oct 1, 2015 5:59 pm

mvpshaq32 wrote:
Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Conley & Holiday were injured, Rockets had no guards, and the Cavs had just Dellavedova basically, otherwise they could have made Curry defend a bit more, but yeah, I think what he's saying is, Curry didn't have anyone who made him defend, thereby tiring him on the offensive end, reducing his efficiency.


That could be it. But even if Warrriors played a team with a dominant PG, their defensive scheme isn't to leave Curry alone on an island with him. Rotations and help will come whether it's Curry or any other of their players.

Lawson is going to tire himself out more trying to go at Curry and the rest of the defense than Curry will expending energy trying to guard Lawson


Good point, and they have Livingston & Iguodala, who are capable of defending PGs, so Curry doesn't have to necessarily guard the PG to further your point.
User avatar
Scalabrine
RealGM
Posts: 18,324
And1: 8,142
Joined: Jun 02, 2004
Location: NorCal
     

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#27 » by Scalabrine » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:00 pm

khufure wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:He isn't wrong. He's saying Curry didn't have to face an offensive threat during the playoffs. And it's relatively true. He didn't have to work that hard defensively in the playoffs.

Agreed but you don't give someone capable of winning an MVP ... and a likely rival in the playoffs ammunition.


You think he's gonna use this to fuel him? Doesn't seem like that big of a deal. He guarded Eric Gordon, Norris Cole, Tony Allen, Courtney Lee, Jason Terry, Pablo Prigioni, Matt Dellavedova, Iman Shumpert. He defended Jrue Holiday, Mike Conley, and Kyrie Irving for short stretches but they were playing hurt and were obviously not themselves and in Irvings case he only played in what 2 games?

If Curry had to guard a healthy Holiday, Conley, Lawson (or even Bev), Irving it definitely would have made it a little tougher for the Warriors but I still think they would have won...

Its not his fault that guys got hurt, and Kerr is a great coach that was able to hide Curry on some weaker players, and Curry isn't an awful defender to begin with...

Not really seeing what's wrong with what Lawson is saying...
Go Knicks!
OptionZero
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,828
Joined: Sep 02, 2007

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#28 » by OptionZero » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:01 pm

Its hilarious that Lawson's saying that given that Curry lit up the Nuggets when anyone not named Andre Iguodala was guarding him.

I will say two observations:
Curry's defense on Eric Gordon was terrible. He lost track of Gordon (and other shooters when it was his assignment), multiple times, giving up 3's that kept that NOP team in games they had no business being in. This is coming from a GSW fan.

Curry's defense in the Cavs series was excellent. He was put on the stage when CLE ran that Delly-Lebron pick and roll. Of course, Curry has no chance one on one against LBJ, but he did have the defensive responsibility of flashing on James, slowing him enough for Iguodala to get back into position. In that assignment, I thought Curry did very well hedging and running back.

GSW is awesome on defense in part because they have ridiculous depth of awesome and versatile defenders, but also because of the system AND the execution. Anyone that's played ball knows that talking on defense is important, you can't have someone not paying attention, particularly not in the playoffs. Curry does his part, or else GSW couldn't have had such an ungodly year defensively. He's better on the ball than off it, but the whole "sieve on defense" thing doesn't apply to him, and it sure as hell didn't warrant Lawsonn, of all people, talking ****.

But hey, Lawson's a drunk.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,094
And1: 5,453
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#29 » by skywalker33 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:02 pm

Hector_Reyes_8 wrote:As if Lawson's one to talk about defense. :lol:


Surprising he even knows what the word "defense" means.....he continues to pop off, wouldn't be surprised if he's picked up the bottle again.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 51,041
And1: 33,864
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#30 » by og15 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:04 pm

AshyLarrysDiaper wrote:Glass houses. Lawson has been beyond useless guarding Curry.

I think he was trying to imply that Curry would have to work a little more on defense guarding someone like him than he did these past playoffs, but I don't remember Curry having any issues with Lawson on defense, so even if that''s the case, if Lawson isn't doing much defensively, it won't change much in terms of Curry's production.
Nuggets_Talk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,389
And1: 2,298
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#31 » by Nuggets_Talk » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:04 pm

nomansland wrote:Now that he's gone, I hope he keeps running his mouth and saying all the stupid **** he wants.


i know we didnt get anything in return but this is the biggest "addition by subtraction" weve had in a long time. so glad ty and his problems are gone.
User avatar
miltk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 751
Joined: Oct 09, 2008

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#32 » by miltk » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:11 pm

curry was too busy on offense helping gsw win a ring
User avatar
Jonatton Yeah
Veteran
Posts: 2,609
And1: 4,067
Joined: Dec 11, 2012
Location: Sugar Ape

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#33 » by Jonatton Yeah » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:22 pm

Image
That's hilarious and co
BudenFerry
Pro Prospect
Posts: 917
And1: 1,496
Joined: Mar 18, 2015
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#34 » by BudenFerry » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:22 pm

Jadoogar wrote:
BudenFerry wrote:
Milbuck wrote:Players keep to themselves --> soft era, no intense competition, no rivalries, etc.
Player says something even remotely controversial --> headcase, fool, drunk, etc.


So much this.


Not this at all. What has Lawon accomplished to be able to trash talk? Didn't Curry beat the Nuggets when they played in the playoffs couple years ago?



You have to have merits to be able to talk trash now? Are you really going to act like Lawson is some end of bench scrub?

This world and board are far too hyper sensitive.
NW
Analyst
Posts: 3,097
And1: 651
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Warriorsworld
   

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#35 » by NW » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:22 pm

His legs seemed pretty fresh in that Denver series against Lawson a couple years ago. If Houston wants to give Lawson the ball a bunch in order to tire out Curry, and thus have it out of Harden's hands, then by all means - go for it.
nomansland
Head Coach
Posts: 6,996
And1: 5,385
Joined: Mar 02, 2013
   

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#36 » by nomansland » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:26 pm

Nuggets_Talk wrote:
nomansland wrote:Now that he's gone, I hope he keeps running his mouth and saying all the stupid **** he wants.


i know we didnt get anything in return but this is the biggest "addition by subtraction" weve had in a long time. so glad ty and his problems are gone.



Maybe the biggest addition by subtraction since Camby.

Being totally honest about it, I'd still rather have the Ty who wasn't a DUI machine and social media whore. He's a good player but he sure did eff over the Nuggets.
azwfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,513
And1: 3,854
Joined: May 21, 2004
     

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#37 » by azwfan » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:27 pm

Lawson is right.
And... I'll be much happier playing the Rockets with the ball in Lawson's hands vs. Harden's.
LF75 wrote: It was a dumb idea..And yes I'm a dick.
Nuggets_Talk
Head Coach
Posts: 6,389
And1: 2,298
Joined: Oct 19, 2003
Contact:
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#38 » by Nuggets_Talk » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:32 pm

nomansland wrote:
Nuggets_Talk wrote:
nomansland wrote:Now that he's gone, I hope he keeps running his mouth and saying all the stupid **** he wants.


i know we didnt get anything in return but this is the biggest "addition by subtraction" weve had in a long time. so glad ty and his problems are gone.



Maybe the biggest addition by subtraction since Camby.

Being totally honest about it, I'd still rather have the Ty who wasn't a DUI machine and social media whore. He's a good player but he sure did eff over the Nuggets.


that ty is long gone unfortunately.
walk with me
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,739
And1: 4,548
Joined: Dec 01, 2013

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#39 » by walk with me » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:45 pm

I hate

"he's a drunk"
"he was chilling at home"
"this guy is useless"

types of responses... what does that have to do with the FACT that ty lawson pointed out? Steph didn't face a starting PG for the entire playoffs. it oesn't dimish the ring or anything but if everyone is healthy next year things cold look very diferent
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,121
And1: 7,356
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#40 » by prophet_of_rage » Thu Oct 1, 2015 6:56 pm

walk with me wrote:I hate

"he's a drunk"
"he was chilling at home"
"this guy is useless"

types of responses... what does that have to do with the FACT that ty lawson pointed out? Steph didn't face a starting PG for the entire playoffs. it oesn't dimish the ring or anything but if everyone is healthy next year things cold look very diferent


And1 counters.

Return to The General Board