Lavine signs 4/$80M offer sheet with Kings (UPDATE: Chicago Matches)

RussellandFlow · Post #21 » by **RussellandFlow** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:07 am

Vlade Vlade Vlade :lol:

. Garpax your move.

Dan Z · Post #22 » by **Dan Z** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:07 am

Djh7475 wrote:Do Bulls fans want to match?

No. At least not me.

ForeverTFC · Post #23 » by **ForeverTFC** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:07 am

Ascrilas wrote:Yessssss please play him as much as possible next season we need this pick to be high

He doesn't make them worse. He just doesn't make them $78m better.

Spens1 · Post #24 » by **Spens1** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:07 am

rip bulls, that's a lose-lose situation if i've ever seen one for them.

What are the Kings thinking here though, he's injury prone for 1, 2 you have 2 starting S.G's already, like you need another one. Chicago should aim for an S&T and get Buddy Hield or something (cause Sacramento does not need 3 S.G's).

Post #25 » by **Cactus Jack** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:07 am

Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Shams said it was 4yr/80m

NY 567 · Post #26 » by **NY 567** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:08 am

Yikes. Leave it to the Kings to offer an inefficient chucker who plays no defense that kind of money long term in an offseason where the contracts being handed out have been relatively tame.

NBAFan93 · Post #27 » by **NBAFan93** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:09 am

Wonder what Chicago is going to do.

Is LaVine really that bad? Not sure he’s worth $20M a year, but he’s got promise.

zshawn10 · Post #28 » by **zshawn10** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:09 am

Read on Twitter

dukes_wild · Post #29 » by **dukes_wild** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:09 am

Wow that's so bad, Kings wtf

PaKwAn · Post #30 » by **PaKwAn** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:09 am

They better pray the bulls match that....

Pinkyring · Post #31 » by **Pinkyring** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:10 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Shams said it was 4yr/80m

Thats a 500k guy a year difference, thats pretty meaningless, its still 20m too much

Rubio9Guy · Post #32 » by **Rubio9Guy** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:10 am

Without the injury he gets that contract easily. His third year was just as good as Bookers.

With the injury... not sure

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J727A using RealGM mobile app

DETermination · Post #33 » by **DETermination** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:10 am

Warriorfan · Post #34 » by **Warriorfan** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:10 am

Depends how much guarenteed and TO but it seems like false hustle trying to look busy.
They have Hield and Bogdonovich already.

Pinkyring · Post #35 » by **Pinkyring** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:11 am

Why wouldn't sac go for the other injuried guy in parker, at least he plays a position of need and has a higher ceiling

Silver Man · Post #36 » by **Silver Man** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:11 am

Spens1 wrote:rip bulls, that's a lose-lose situation if i've ever seen one for them.

What are the Kings thinking here though, he's injury prone for 1, 2 you have 2 starting S.G's already, like you need another one. Chicago should aim for an S&T and get Buddy Hield or something (cause Sacramento does not need 3 S.G's).

We don’t think. We just go. There hasn’t been any thought since Vivek came and even more since Vlade made the decisions.

Traderwest · Post #37 » by **Traderwest** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:11 am

4 years 80 million offer sheet

48 hours to match

Post #38 » by **zimpy27** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:11 am

Warriorfan wrote:Depends how much guarenteed and TO but it seems like false hustle trying to look busy.
They have Hield and Bogdonovich already.

It's fully guaranteed, no options

NY 567 · Post #39 » by **NY 567** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:12 am

Pinkyring wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
Magic_Johnny12 wrote:Shams said it was 4yr/80m

Thats a 500k guy a year difference, thats pretty meaningless, its still 20m too much

It's 50 million too much.

Spens1 · Post #40 » by **Spens1** » Sat Jul 7, 2018 12:12 am

Silver Man wrote:
Spens1 wrote:rip bulls, that's a lose-lose situation if i've ever seen one for them.

What are the Kings thinking here though, he's injury prone for 1, 2 you have 2 starting S.G's already, like you need another one. Chicago should aim for an S&T and get Buddy Hield or something (cause Sacramento does not need 3 S.G's).

We don’t think. We just go. There hasn’t been any thought since Vivek came and even more since Vlade made the decisions.

i know, you guys would have been better off getting Jabari (not great but still, at least its a S.F) or going out and spending that money on Capella.