Post#34 » by G R E Y » Fri Nov 27, 2020 4:22 am
Oh fun!
Why didn't mean PATFO send sulking #2 who publicly tanked his value for a year to the very destination he wanted? The answer is in your question.
The answer isn't in the LAL "Godfather offer" which despite including Ingram, also included Deng's albatross contract which LAL are still trying to shed. So, LAL would've gotten the best player in the deal AND shed salary? Awesome.
We'll do this one more time: Spurs sought an All Star, a prospect, and a pick. The ONLY team that provided all three was TO. Regardless of what you think of the Ingram / DeRozan comparison as players, Ingram didn't in fact help NOP get any further. DD was an immense vet benefit in the locker room, eased scoring pressure from double- and triple- teamed LMA, and had two of the most efficient seasons of his career with us. Plus, his contract is up in 2021, at which point we will have the second highest cap space. Plus we just re-signed Jakob who is very important for us defensively and a great locker room guy, plus we drafted projected lottery talent Keldon Johnson at 29. Remember that name. Watch what this kid will do.
I have no doubt PATFO had even less desire than usual to deal with the Lakers. But the argument would be far stronger had PATFO turned down exactly what it sought. LAL, despite whatever people may think of BI, simply didn't match what Spurs sought. Simple as that.
I mean this sincerely, but I like the deal more and more the longer we are from it. Not just by addition by drama subtraction, but we are a better team with a higher floor and a higher ceiling because of it. It took some foresight and discipline to hold out for the right deal, which despite the handcuffed circumstances, nevertheless fulfilled a long-standing mandate of good for the present, and good for the future. We're good.



The Spurs Way Ever Onward
#XX