Scalabrine wrote:MelosSoreWrist wrote:Scalabrine wrote:He should re-sign with the Suns but I think the team in biggest need of a player like Chris Paul is the Knicks. We were the 4 seed with Elfrid Payton as our starting point guard and getting 24 mpg. Replace that with CP3 or even an average starting point guard (ahem, Colin Sexton), and I think we're obviously a vastly improved team with a much higher ceiling.
Even with CP3, Knicks max out as a 4 seed. Paul doesnt raise the Knicks above Nets, Bucks and 76ers. Heck even to get back to 4th seed will be hard with the Hawks leveling up, Heat about to retool with a strong core.
After watching the improvements that the Thunder and Suns have made by adding Paul I have no idea how you could think that they don't get any better by replacing Elfrid Payton with Chris Paul. Thats honestly one of the more ridiculous takes I've seen on this board and if you look at my joined date, you'll see I've been around for quite a while.
We have a young and improving core. 3 picks in the Top 32. The most cap space in the league. If you are gonna say that the Hawks are leveling up and the Heat are retooling, well...then so are we!
Chris Paul will make the Knicks better but he wont elevate them above the Nets, Bucks and 76ers. I dont think thats a controversial statement.
Knicks got blown out by the Hawks 4-1 in the playoffs. Hawks had one of the best records in the NBA the second half of the season. Not a controversial thought to think that the Hawks are better than the Knicks.
I would guess the general consensus is that the Knicks overachieved this year. Randle got exposed in the playoffs. For next season, how would you rank Randle, Barrett, Bam and Butler?