Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
- ProcessDoctor
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,593
- And1: 6,359
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
He shouldn't have left Miami. He shouldn't have left Cleveland the 2nd time.
2025-2026 Philadelphia 76ers:
Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Edgecombe/Grimes/Gordon
George/Oubre/Edwards
Barlow/Watford/Walker
Embiid/Drummond/Bona/Broome
Maxey/McCain/Lowry
Edgecombe/Grimes/Gordon
George/Oubre/Edwards
Barlow/Watford/Walker
Embiid/Drummond/Bona/Broome
Re: LeBron will be eligible for a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on August 4
-
MemphisX
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,825
- And1: 3,741
- Joined: Nov 10, 2011
Re: LeBron will be eligible for a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on August 4
C3H6N6O6 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Signing and trading him would be more in the best interest of the franchise but I doubt that will happen.
Which team would trade for a player like Lebron on effectively a 3 year $140 million contract?
Huh? Like most of the league depending on what they wanted in return. He is not bringing back a lot of assets but he would bring back a decent return. Good prospect and some picks.
Check out my Memphis Grizzlies Youtube Channel --->>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbB6yGykQEUwl9hqWYVp45g
Re: LeBron will be eligible for a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on August 4
-
dhsilv2
- RealGM
- Posts: 50,627
- And1: 27,314
- Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Re: LeBron will be eligible for a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on August 4
C3H6N6O6 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Signing and trading him would be more in the best interest of the franchise but I doubt that will happen.
Which team would trade for a player like Lebron on effectively a 3 year $140 million contract?
The ones that like money?
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
- Dr Aki
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,793
- And1: 32,175
- Joined: Mar 03, 2008
- Location: Sydney, Australia
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
DroseReturnChi wrote:yes but lebron will demand a 4yr supermax which is easy no. hes a bum that will get waived after 40.
the best scenario is sign and trade whether its a 2 or 4 yr. let golden state implode.
Over 38 rule comes into effect.
There's a reason LeBron is signing 2 year extensions, it's because the Lakers can't practically (CBA) offer anything longer because it no longer matters whether they offer a 2 year or a 4 year, it all turns into a rolling yearly max expiring contract (depending on when LeBron wants to retire).
In terms of on-court production, LeBron is still the best player the Lakers have, and with off-court production, he's definitely paying off his own salary and more.

Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
RalphWiggum
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,338
- And1: 8,483
- Joined: Jul 11, 2001
- Location: PARTS UNKNOWN
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Should I dip my face in a deep fryer?
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
JordansBulls
- RealGM
- Posts: 60,467
- And1: 5,349
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: HCA (Homecourt Advantage)
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Im not sure why you would unless he was younger especially if you just finished outside the top 10 in the West. Maybe had he been there 7-8 years or so it would make sense.

"Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships."
- Michael Jordan
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
skones
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,108
- And1: 17,267
- Joined: Jul 20, 2004
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Honestly, can't wait for him to go back to Cleveland and tear apart what they have going from the inside.
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
falcolombardi
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 7,184
- Joined: Apr 13, 2021
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
ProcessDoctor wrote:He shouldn't have left Miami. He shouldn't have left Cleveland the 2nd time.
going back to cleveland was the right move in every aspect
going to lakers was questionable but after kyrie suddendly leaving and with his own injuries in los Ángeles his prospects in cleveland were not much better than los Ángeles tbh
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
falcolombardi
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,587
- And1: 7,184
- Joined: Apr 13, 2021
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
skones wrote:Honestly, can't wait for him to go back to Cleveland and tear apart what they have going from the inside.
tear apart what?
Re: LeBron will be eligible for a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on August 4
-
vxmike
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,659
- And1: 4,568
- Joined: Sep 24, 2014
-
Re: LeBron will be eligible for a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on August 4
C3H6N6O6 wrote:Harry Garris wrote:Signing and trading him would be more in the best interest of the franchise but I doubt that will happen.
Which team would trade for a player like Lebron on effectively a 3 year $140 million contract?
29 other teams.
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
- Plossum
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,147
- And1: 6,112
- Joined: Jan 18, 2014
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Of course they should. He’s still a productive, top 10 player. Not to mention his value extends beyond on court production. It’s a no brainer.
#LockUpChuck
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
Ballerhogger
- RealGM
- Posts: 47,741
- And1: 17,306
- Joined: Jul 06, 2014
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
They have no choice
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
phanman
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,530
- And1: 9,190
- Joined: Mar 18, 2016
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
JN61 wrote:phanman wrote:They'll do it and they'll be happy with it.
The Lakers without Bron are irrelevant and they've already unloaded all their future draft stock for Davis
They are already irrelevant with him.
You must live in a bubble with no access to any basketball news/websites. Lakers and Bron coverage/conversation is everywhere regardless of how much they sucked this season.
Like others stated, he more than makes up the cost of his salary with all the massive off court financial benefit he has for the team and city with his inclusion.
Despite what happened this season, you aren't going to get a better start at building a competitive team in LA than a Bron/AD Duo. Without their picks they can't really tank and face it both guys trade value are at the lowest in their career with age and health being the biggest factor.
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
JN61
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,746
- And1: 9,259
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
phanman wrote:JN61 wrote:phanman wrote:They'll do it and they'll be happy with it.
The Lakers without Bron are irrelevant and they've already unloaded all their future draft stock for Davis
They are already irrelevant with him.
You must live in a bubble with no access to any basketball news/websites. Lakers and Bron coverage/conversation is everywhere regardless of how much they sucked this season.
Like others stated, he more than makes up the cost of his salary with all the massive off court financial benefit he has for the team and city with his inclusion.
Despite what happened this season, you aren't going to get a better start at building a competitive team in LA than a Bron/AD Duo. Without their picks they can't really tank and face it both guys trade value are at the lowest in their career with age and health being the biggest factor.
Will definitely get a better start by trading LeBron.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
- Lalouie
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,394
- And1: 12,472
- Joined: May 12, 2017
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
get on the red phone to miami and ask riley what they should do
the question is, of course, why should the lakers expect lebron to fix this??? he's already getting the lifeboat for one ready
also with the end of the superteam, with the past decade's stars getting old, and with parity and youth taking over, THERE IS NO BETTER TIME to jettison lebron and start over. the worst teams in the nba still have 20wins and extract their pound of flesh here and there
and there's no way any sane team should draft bronny. on that issue alone,,,,lebron is gone
cash in on lebron, the lakers are still a destination
the question is, of course, why should the lakers expect lebron to fix this??? he's already getting the lifeboat for one ready
also with the end of the superteam, with the past decade's stars getting old, and with parity and youth taking over, THERE IS NO BETTER TIME to jettison lebron and start over. the worst teams in the nba still have 20wins and extract their pound of flesh here and there
and there's no way any sane team should draft bronny. on that issue alone,,,,lebron is gone
cash in on lebron, the lakers are still a destination
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
picko
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,592
- And1: 3,700
- Joined: May 17, 2018
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
If he really wants to play with his son then he can't sign a max extension - it would make him impossible to trade.
From the Lakers perspective, LeBron generates more money then he'll ever earn but it's incredibly risky offering old players max contracts as the Lakers themselves discovered with Kobe.
From the Lakers perspective, LeBron generates more money then he'll ever earn but it's incredibly risky offering old players max contracts as the Lakers themselves discovered with Kobe.
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
- Lalouie
- RealGM
- Posts: 23,394
- And1: 12,472
- Joined: May 12, 2017
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
picko wrote:If he really wants to play with his son then he can't sign a max extension - it would make him impossible to trade.
From the Lakers perspective, LeBron generates more money then he'll ever earn but it's incredibly risky offering old players max contracts as the Lakers themselves discovered with Kobe.
if their guiding light is making $$$$$$$$ in the couple of years lebron is there instead of rebuilding,,,then lal is truly hopeless. just one mistake on top of another
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
Jfh20
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,454
- And1: 1,775
- Joined: Dec 12, 2019
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
He will not remain in LA, i could see a scenario where if the heat dont win the title they will trade everyone except bam for him....they will dub it the reunion or some bs.. miami will do anything for there 4th title, and im sure bron will do anything for his 5th. lowry/bron/bam will be a nice little core of strong youth/vet power. Bam is perfect too because hes a great defender..
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
-
Monky15
- Starter
- Posts: 2,244
- And1: 728
- Joined: Mar 13, 2012
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Any team looking to add him will need to be weary, you would want to have someone who can keep him in line cos he isn't the best player on a contender anymore but he will act like it. Add him to an up and coming team and watch him become toxic in the locker room blaiming everyone but himself. He's basically a bigger Westbrook waiting to happen, thankfully his size will prevent him from going full Westbrook.
Lakers sold their future to win a ring with him, he's a mercenary and doesn't deserve any loyalty.
Lakers sold their future to win a ring with him, he's a mercenary and doesn't deserve any loyalty.
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
- Beethoven
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,720
- And1: 4,674
- Joined: May 03, 2012
- Location: Utopian Dystopia
-
Re: Should the Lakers offer LeBron a 2 year, $97.1 million extension on Aug 4?
Lebron will be back in the purple and gold for the rest of his career.
Kobe Bryant forever
GO LAKERS

I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.
GO LAKERS
I've heard it through the grapevine..NBA gods have already designated Los Angeles LAKERS as NBA Champions in near future. The destiny is real. TRUST ME.




