bisme37 wrote:Warriors fans should correct me if I'm off base, but I get the strong impression that the Dubs are used to dominating the 3rd quarter to the extend that they build a huge lead and the other team gives up and goes away. They want to sit and watch garbage time in the 4th.
But the Celtics don't go away and they've been as good in the 4th as the Warriors have been in the 3rd. Seems like it's been a shock to the Warriors system and they haven't been mentally or physically prepared for a 48 minute war.
Kinda? We usually take a dive to start the 4th (and Q2). If you ask Kerr, its a damned mystery
If you ask player tracking, its that Jordan Poole cannot create quality offensive opportunities against quality defenses. I got my hopes up in game 2, because after the predictable Q2 failure, we started Q4 with Poole, Wiggins and Dray playing together. Wiggins is important because he helps on perimeter D more than any other player we have, and Dray is important to take the ball out of Poole's hands as a decision maker. We started the 4th Q on a 6-0 run and then the game really devolved into garbage time
But typically, Poole is sent out there with Klay, OPJ, Looney... sometimes Lee, sometimes Iguodala, sometimes Wiggins. And the times he is out there with Dray, they play Dray off ball (which is just baffling tbh). Its something I've hated to see all year, and unfortunately we're still doing it. Pretending Poole is a good enough PG to battle elite defenses is a losing gambit, but Kerr has not seen the need to pivot yet... and even if I wanted to be a Devil's Advocate there, I couldn't, because I cannot explain it in any way that would track logically