omerome wrote:whatisacenter wrote:OrangeBlueSkies wrote:He won’t budge on his ask of SIX first round picks? No problem, let Mitchell ruin your tank and just have yourself a disgruntled superstar. We have all the assets and therefore we, the Knicks, can dictate how this goes down.
Don’t wanna trade us D Mitchell? Hey Brooklyn, how’s Randle, 4 firsts, and D Rose for KD?
We have 8 firsts at our disposal, don’t mess this up, and like I been saying since this regime took over, I’ve got faith in them not messing this up.
Even four firsts is a lot of picks, but if we can do fournier, Reddish, 4 firsts, I’m into it. If not let Danny [and unfortunately, Donovan] rot.
The less we give up in a Mitchell deal the more we have for a follow up deal to pair another star next to RJ:Brunson:Mitchell.
Yes, Randle and 3 or 4 firsts can get you something in this market.
how Knicks' fan thinks their assets look.
how Knicks assets really look.
Har har har.
If these assets weren't so valuable, why is Ainge so adamant about grabbing as many as he can?
Unprotected future Knicks draft picks are definitely a tier 1 asset.