naabzor wrote:I would go as far as to say that he is a puppet and this still Lebron team.
Lebron was the clear 3rd option behind AD and Hachimura. This is the opposite of Lebron ball.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
naabzor wrote:I would go as far as to say that he is a puppet and this still Lebron team.
Mamba Mentality wrote:It's early but there was A LOT to like...
1. No more iso ball from LeBron where the other four guys just stand around, we're running actual sets. Some beautiful ATO plays as well and timely use of timeouts to prevent any shifts in momentum.
2. Big takeaway on defense is that we are no longer playing drop coverage. We put bodies on shooters and forced the Wolves to finish in the paint against our size. Also liked that he mixed up the defensive coverages and we didn't trot out three guard lineups. Not necessarily sold on Hayes, but the two big look was also interesting to see.
3. I'm encouraged that we won a game with abysmal shooting. Good thing is we have a guy who is an expert in that area and can alleviate some of those problems by drawing up cleaner looks for our shooters.
4. Overall it's just refreshing to see a guy who is engaged from start to finish. Whether it was coaching guys up or being in the officials' ears, he was present, as opposed to his predecessor who quite literally just stood around with hands in his pocket because he was clueless.
Kobeskillz wrote:I was impressed but he also followed Ham.
If i followed Ham id look brilliant too!
Liam_Gallagher wrote:I see a different fire with this team. They were active on defense. They crashed the boards. They were tough.
Kent wrote:Liam_Gallagher wrote:I see a different fire with this team. They were active on defense. They crashed the boards. They were tough.
This.
I can't remember seeing the LeBron-led Lakers playing with such an energy. And that energy led to playing together, for each other, and with aggression and focus.
Whether it's good enough for COY remains to be seen but, from the looks of it, the team is bought in.
Ballerhogger wrote:He made the right adjustments and run the offense through AD
CodeBreaker wrote:ORLMagicGirl15 wrote:I like JJ, I just don’t want him to be blamed or fired if they don't win the championship this year. He’s a first time coach, not sure if he needed that stress with added pressure.
he knew what he's getting into
SweaterBae wrote:It's the perfect trade when nobody is happy.
Liam_Gallagher wrote:It might be too early, but it was impressive. Don't forget Luke Walton and the the 2016-17 Lakers opened their season with a win and even started the season 10-10 after expecting to be a bottom feeder (they ended up near the bottom after).
I see a different fire with this team. They were active on defense. They crashed the boards. They were tough. They also shot 5-30 from three and still won by a good amount. If they shoot league average they win by 30.