Scalabrine wrote:I don't think it should be a Braun vs KCP thing, it should be a Braun vs. Braun AND KCP thing.
You brought some good points here. Here is how I look at it as a fan.
Championship duo was KCP/Brown. KCP as starting 3nD, can't create, plays good of off Jokic/starters, Brown as combo guard form the bench who can create some for himself and the others, and plays good D.
Last year's duo was KCP/Braun. Here is a problem because Braun is simmilar player to KCP - can't create, plays good of off Jokic/starters.
This years duo is Braun/Strawther. Braun is already as good as KCP with starters and while Strawther is worst on D from the group he is the best on O as far as creating shots from himself and others and scoring. So they hoped Braun/Strawther duo after this season, before playoffs, could be as good as KCP/Brown and better than KCP/Braun. When I say better it is not in vacuum but in their roles.
Scalabrine wrote:This wasn't a Bruce Brown situation, where the Nuggets legally couldn't pay him the money he signed for. Even if they couldn't afford it in the long run, they should have signed him and then flipped him in December for some more rotation players. No one is arguing that Braun isn't a good player. People are arguing that the Nuggets only have 5-6 NBA level rotation players.
They could have done KCP for Gary Harris and Bitadze.
I would have killed for Gary Harris and Bitadze,

but I think the reason they didn't resign KCP was exectly the reason why they didn't do any sign and trade options. The reason they didn't resigned him for the money he got from Orlando was to avoid 2nd apron. If they decided to go into 2nd apron they would have kept him. If not there is no logic in going into 2nd apron with other players as good or worst then him.
And if I'm not mistaken teams in 2nd apron can't do sign and trade
I think that was their line of thinking.